[PATCH 15/19] drm/i915: Simplify cdclk_disable_noatomic()
Govindapillai, Vinod
vinod.govindapillai at intel.com
Tue Mar 4 15:22:52 UTC 2025
On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 17:04 +0200, Govindapillai, Vinod wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 23:19 +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Instead of hand rolling the cdclk state disabling for a
> > pipe in noatomic() let's just recompute the whole thing
> > from scratch. Less code we have to remember to keep in sync.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 7 +------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > index 62caee4a8b64..2a8749a0213e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
> > @@ -3364,13 +3364,8 @@ void intel_cdclk_update_hw_state(struct intel_display *display)
> > void intel_cdclk_crtc_disable_noatomic(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> > {
> > struct intel_display *display = to_intel_display(crtc);
> > - struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state =
> > - to_intel_cdclk_state(display->cdclk.obj.state);
> > - enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
> >
> > - cdclk_state->min_cdclk[pipe] = 0;
> > - cdclk_state->min_voltage_level[pipe] = 0;
> > - cdclk_state->active_pipes &= ~BIT(pipe);
> > + intel_cdclk_update_hw_state(display);
> > }
> >
>
> Okay! Now I see that passing active_pipes to intel_cdclk_update_hw_state() as I commented in one
> of
> the earlier patch wont work!
>
> But isnt this bit efficient, as we will be calling, intel_cdclk_crtc_disable_noatomic() (and
> intel_cdclk_update_hw_state()) for_each_intel_crtc_in_pipe_mask(), we end up executing
> intel_cdclk_update_hw_state() redundantly?
>
> Instead should we extract intel_cdclk_update_crtc_hw_state() from intel_cdclk_update_hw_state()
> and use that here?
>
> BR
> Vinod
Forgot to RB, with the above comments' relevancy checked out,
Reviewed-by: Vinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai at intel.com>
>
>
> > static int intel_compute_max_dotclk(struct intel_display *display)
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list