[PATCH v5] drm/i915/dmc: Create debugfs entry for dc6 counter

Naladala, Ramanaidu Ramanaidu.naladala at intel.com
Wed Mar 12 18:14:20 UTC 2025


Hi Imre/Thasleem,

On 3/12/2025 8:38 PM, Imre Deak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 08:13:10PM +0530, Mohammed Thasleem wrote:
>> Starting from MTL we don't have a platform agnostic way to validate
>> DC6 state due to dc6 counter has been removed to validate DC state.
>>
>> The goal is to validate that the display HW can reach the DC6 power
>> state. There is no HW DC6 residency counter (and there wasn't such
>> a counter earlier either), so an alternative way is required. According
>> to the HW team the display driver has programmed everything correctly in
>> order to allow the DC6 power state if the DC5 power state is reached
>> (indicated by the HW DC5 residency counter incrementing) and DC6 is
>> enabled by the driver.
>>
>> Driver could take a snapshot of the DC5 residency counter right
>> after it enables DC6 (dc5_residency_start) and increment the SW
>> DC6 residency counter right before it disables DC6 or when user space
>> reads the DC6 counter. So the driver would update the counter at these
>> two points in the following way:
>> dc6_residency_counter += dc5_current_count - dc5_start_count
>>
>> v2: Update the discription. (Imre)
>>      Read dc5 count during dc6 enable and disable then and update
>>      dc6 residency counter. (Imre)
>>      Remove variable from dmc structure. (Jani)
>>      Updated the subject title.
>> v3: Add i915_power_domains lock to updated dc6 count in debugfs. (Imre)
>>      Use flags to check dc6 enable/disable states. (Imre)
>>      Move the display version check and counter read/update to
>>      a helper. (Imre)
>>      Resize the variable length. (Rodrigo)
>>      Use old dc6 debugfs entry for every platform. (Rodrigo)
>> v4: Remove superfluous whitespace. (Jani)
>>      Read DMC registers in intel_dmc.c (Jani)
>>      Rename dc6_en_dis to dc6_enabled and change its type to bool. (Jani)
>>      Rename update_dc6_count and move it to intel_dmc.c (Jani)
>>      Rename dc6_en_dis to start_tracking. (Imre)
>>      Have lock for dc6 state read aswelll. (Imre)
>>      Keep the existing way print 'DC5 -> DC6 count' along with
>>      new 'DC6 Allowed Count' print. (Imre)
>>      Add counters in intel_dmc struct. (Imre)
>>      Have interface to return dc6 allowed count. (Imre)
>>      Rename dc6_count to dc6_allowed_count. (Rodrigo)
>> v5: Rename counters and move in to dc6_allowed structure. (Imre)
>>      Order declaration lines in decreasing line length. (Imre)
>>      Update start_tacking logic. (Imre)
>>      Move get couner inside lock and DISPLAY_VER code to helper. (Imre)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mohammed Thasleem <mohammed.thasleem at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   .../i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c   | 11 +++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c      | 54 +++++++++++++++++--
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h      |  1 +
>>   3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
>> index 8ec87ffd87d2..574352439573 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power_well.c
>> @@ -752,8 +752,9 @@ void gen9_sanitize_dc_state(struct intel_display *display)
>>   void gen9_set_dc_state(struct intel_display *display, u32 state)
>>   {
>>   	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &display->power.domains;
>> -	u32 val;
>> +	bool dc6_was_enabled, enable_dc6;
>>   	u32 mask;
>> +	u32 val;
>>   
>>   	if (!HAS_DISPLAY(display))
>>   		return;
>> @@ -772,11 +773,19 @@ void gen9_set_dc_state(struct intel_display *display, u32 state)
>>   		drm_err(display->drm, "DC state mismatch (0x%x -> 0x%x)\n",
>>   			power_domains->dc_state, val & mask);
>>   
>> +	enable_dc6 = state & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6;
>> +	dc6_was_enabled = val & DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6;
>> +	if (!dc6_was_enabled && enable_dc6)
>> +		intel_dmc_update_dc6_allowed_count(display, true);
>> +
>>   	val &= ~mask;
>>   	val |= state;
>>   
>>   	gen9_write_dc_state(display, val);
>>   
>> +	if (!enable_dc6 && dc6_was_enabled)
>> +		intel_dmc_update_dc6_allowed_count(display, false);
>> +
>>   	power_domains->dc_state = val & mask;
>>   }
>>   
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>> index fa6944e55d95..95abeec0586a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>>   #include "i915_drv.h"
>>   #include "i915_reg.h"
>>   #include "intel_de.h"
>> +#include "intel_display_power_well.h"
>>   #include "intel_dmc.h"
>>   #include "intel_dmc_regs.h"
>>   #include "intel_step.h"
>> @@ -57,6 +58,10 @@ struct intel_dmc {
>>   	const char *fw_path;
>>   	u32 max_fw_size; /* bytes */
>>   	u32 version;
>> +	struct {
>> +		u32 dc5_start;
>> +		u32 count;
>> +	} dc6_allowed;
>>   	struct dmc_fw_info {
>>   		u32 mmio_count;
>>   		i915_reg_t mmioaddr[20];
>> @@ -1232,6 +1237,43 @@ void intel_dmc_snapshot_print(const struct intel_dmc_snapshot *snapshot, struct
>>   			   DMC_VERSION_MINOR(snapshot->version));
>>   }
>>   
>> +void intel_dmc_update_dc6_allowed_count(struct intel_display *display,
>> +					bool start_tracking)
>> +{
>> +	struct intel_dmc *dmc = display_to_dmc(display);
>> +	u32 dc5_cur_count;
>> +
>> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(dmc->display) < 14)
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	dc5_cur_count = intel_de_read(dmc->display, DG1_DMC_DEBUG_DC5_COUNT);
>> +
>> +	if (!start_tracking)
>> +		dmc->dc6_allowed.count += dc5_cur_count - dmc->dc6_allowed.dc5_start;
>> +
>> +	dmc->dc6_allowed.dc5_start = dc5_cur_count;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u32 intel_dmc_get_dc6_allowed_count(struct intel_display *display, u32 *count)
> The return type isn't compatible with the -ENODEV returned value. I'd
> just return a bool, since the reason for an error is always the same.
>
>> +{
>> +	struct i915_power_domains *power_domains = &display->power.domains;
>> +	struct intel_dmc *dmc = display_to_dmc(display);
>> +
>> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(display) < 14)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
>> +	bool dc6_enabled = DC_STATE_EN_UPTO_DC6 &
>> +			   intel_de_read(display, DC_STATE_EN);

The dc6_enabled flag indicates only the DC state limit. If all 
conditions are met, the DMC can entry/exits DC6.

However, if the DC6 conditions are not met, the DMC can perform 
entry/exits up to DC5. Entry/exits from

DC5 to DC3 can also change the DG1_DMC_DEBUG_DC5_COUNT counter values. 
It is better to add a pc10 check

along with the dc6_enabled flag.


Correct me if my understanding is wrong.

>> +	if (dc6_enabled)
>> +		intel_dmc_update_dc6_allowed_count(display, false);
>> +
>> +	*count = dmc->dc6_allowed.count;
>> +	mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static int intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>>   {
>>   	struct intel_display *display = m->private;
>> @@ -1239,6 +1281,7 @@ static int intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>>   	struct intel_dmc *dmc = display_to_dmc(display);
>>   	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>>   	i915_reg_t dc5_reg, dc6_reg = INVALID_MMIO_REG;
>> +	u32 dc6_allowed_count;
>>   
>>   	if (!HAS_DMC(display))
>>   		return -ENODEV;
>> @@ -1287,9 +1330,14 @@ static int intel_dmc_debugfs_status_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
>>   	}
>>   
>>   	seq_printf(m, "DC3 -> DC5 count: %d\n", intel_de_read(display, dc5_reg));
>> -	if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(dc6_reg))
>> -		seq_printf(m, "DC5 -> DC6 count: %d\n",
>> -			   intel_de_read(display, dc6_reg));
>> +
>> +	if (intel_dmc_get_dc6_allowed_count(display, &dc6_allowed_count) == 0) {
>> +		seq_printf(m, "DC6 Allowed Count : %d\n", dc6_allowed_count);
> "DC5 -> DC6 allowed count: %d\n" would align better with the other
> entries printed.
>
>> +	} else {
>> +		if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(dc6_reg)) {
> The above else/if could be combined to 'else if (i915_mmio_reg_valid(...))'
> and the {} could be dropped from around both resultant if branches.
>
> With the above fixed the patch looks ok to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
>
>> +			seq_printf(m, "DC5 -> DC6 count: %d\n",
>> +				   intel_de_read(display, dc6_reg)); }
>> +	}
>>   
>>   	seq_printf(m, "program base: 0x%08x\n",
>>   		   intel_de_read(display, DMC_PROGRAM(dmc->dmc_info[DMC_FW_MAIN].start_mmioaddr, 0)));
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
>> index 44cecef98e73..c78426eb4cd5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ void intel_dmc_debugfs_register(struct intel_display *display);
>>   
>>   struct intel_dmc_snapshot *intel_dmc_snapshot_capture(struct intel_display *display);
>>   void intel_dmc_snapshot_print(const struct intel_dmc_snapshot *snapshot, struct drm_printer *p);
>> +void intel_dmc_update_dc6_allowed_count(struct intel_display *display, bool start_tracking);
>>   
>>   void assert_dmc_loaded(struct intel_display *display);
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>>


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list