<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 29/04/2016 09:49, Chris Wilson wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:20160429084935.GD30680@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com" type="cite"> <pre wrap="">On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 09:36:37AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap=""> On 28/04/16 17:24, Chris Wilson wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre wrap="">With the introduction of a distinct engine->id vs the hardware id, we need to fix up the value we use for selecting the target engine when signaling a semaphore. Note that these values can be merged with engine->guc_id. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> So I broke something more with the decoupling, did not realize. I suppose it was still worth it. This at least wasn't being used. </pre> </blockquote> <pre wrap=""> A consolation prize: wean the guc over to a common hw_id :) -Chris </pre> </blockquote> As in, use the GuC's concept of the engine ID for other purposes too? .Dave. </body> </html>