<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Exchange Server">
<!-- converted from text --><style><!-- .EmailQuote { margin-left: 1pt; padding-left: 4pt; border-left: #800000 2px solid; } --></style>
</head>
<body>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<style type="text/css" style="">
<!--
p
{margin-top:0;
margin-bottom:0}
-->
</style>
<div dir="ltr">
<div id="x_divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<p><span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">>> @@ -5829,6 +6068,10 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state)</span><br style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">>> return ret;</span><br style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">>> }</span><br style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">>> </span><br style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">>> + ret = intel_compute_sagv_mask(state);</span><br style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">>> + if (ret)</span><br style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">>> + return ret;</span><br style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">
<br style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">
<span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">> This seems too early. We haven't even computed the ddb yet.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px"><br>
</span></p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">I was thinking about our discussion last week and actually I think there are simply two ways how</span></p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px">to do it.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont; font-size:13.3333px"><br>
</span></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">1) What I do here is: calculate minimum amount required to fit SAGV wm levels into ddb and </span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">based on that do the ddb allocation accordingly. I.e it is not to early because actually we have</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">already wm levels for sagv and non-sagv calculated - we already can check if it can fit into L0</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">and then act accordingly. </span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">However one thing to consider here: as you said besides the minimal requirements for each plane</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">(with or without sagv) there is an extra space being allocated in proportion to plane data rate,</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">however here we are actually hitting the prioritization issue - i.e we need to decide whether </span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">it is more important to have SAGV or to have more extra space allocated to different planes</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">proportionally to their needs.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">So in this first approach we always first determine if we fit into minimum SAGV reqs, turn it </span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">on if we do and then rest of extra space is allocated among the planes in proportion to data rate.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">So that way we would be more often power efficient but but planes get less extra ddb space.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px"><br>
</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">2) In your approach we should calculate ddb first, allocate extra space proportionally to plane</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">data rate needs and only then check if all planes got enough space for L0 SAGV wm after that.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">Then we actually don't even need skl_plane_wm_level accessor, because we first would be allocating</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">using normal wm levels + extra ddb and only then check if all planes fit into SAGV requirement -</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">because that extra space is not actually distributed evenly but in proportion to data rate of each</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">plane, which means that some planes might lack space for SAGV theoretically, because some might be</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">getting more or less depending on the data_rate/total_data_rate ratio.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px"><br>
</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">My position is such that I'm really not like "my approach should always win" here, but more searching for</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">solution which is more correct from product point of view.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px"><br>
</span></font></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">Also could be that it doesn't really matter which approach we do take now,,</span></font><span style="font-size:13.3333px; color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont"> </span><span style="font-size:13.3333px; color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont">but
matter more like</span></p>
<p><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">that how fast we deliver. B</span></font><span style="font-size:13.3333px; color:rgb(33,33,33); font-family:wf_segoe-ui_normal,"Segoe UI","Segoe WP",Tahoma,Arial,sans-serif,serif,EmojiFont">ecause
the actual outcome difference between two</span><font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px"></p>
<p style="font-family:Calibri,Helvetica,sans-serif,EmojiFont,"Apple Color Emoji","Segoe UI Emoji",NotoColorEmoji,"Segoe UI Symbol","Android Emoji",EmojiSymbols; font-size:16px">
<font color="#212121" face="wf_segoe-ui_normal, Segoe UI, Segoe WP, Tahoma, Arial, sans-serif, serif, EmojiFont"><span style="font-size:13.3333px">might be minor, while time overhead for changing the approach could be major.</span></font></p>
</span></font>
<p></p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div id="x_Signature">
<div style="font-family:Tahoma; font-size:13px"><font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt">Best Regards,<br>
<br>
Lisovskiy Stanislav <br>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="x_divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, March 11, 2020 6:31:30 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Lisovskiy, Stanislav<br>
<b>Cc:</b> intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Ausmus, James; Saarinen, Jani; Roper, Matthew D<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [PATCH v19 4/8] drm/i915: Refactor intel_can_enable_sagv</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
<font size="2"><span style="font-size:10pt;">
<div class="PlainText">On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:12:00PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:<br>
> Currently intel_can_enable_sagv function contains<br>
> a mix of workarounds for different platforms<br>
> some of them are not valid for gens >= 11 already,<br>
> so lets split it into separate functions.<br>
> <br>
> v2:<br>
> - Rework watermark calculation algorithm to<br>
> attempt to calculate Level 0 watermark<br>
> with added sagv block time latency and<br>
> check if it fits in DBuf in order to<br>
> determine if SAGV can be enabled already<br>
> at this stage, just as BSpec 49325 states.<br>
> if that fails rollback to usual Level 0<br>
> latency and disable SAGV.<br>
> - Remove unneeded tabs(James Ausmus)<br>
> <br>
> v3: Rebased the patch<br>
> <br>
> v4: - Added back interlaced check for Gen12 and<br>
> added separate function for TGL SAGV check<br>
> (thanks to James Ausmus for spotting)<br>
> - Removed unneeded gen check<br>
> - Extracted Gen12 SAGV decision making code<br>
> to a separate function from skl_compute_wm<br>
> <br>
> v5: - Added SAGV global state to dev_priv, because<br>
> we need to track all pipes, not only those<br>
> in atomic state. Each pipe has now correspondent<br>
> bit mask reflecting, whether it can tolerate<br>
> SAGV or not(thanks to Ville Syrjala for suggestions).<br>
> - Now using active flag instead of enable in crc<br>
> usage check.<br>
> <br>
> v6: - Fixed rebase conflicts<br>
> <br>
> v7: - kms_cursor_legacy seems to get broken because of multiple memcpy<br>
> calls when copying level 0 water marks for enabled SAGV, to<br>
> fix this now simply using that field right away, without copying,<br>
> for that introduced a new wm_level accessor which decides which<br>
> wm_level to return based on SAGV state.<br>
> <br>
> v8: - Protect crtc_sagv_mask same way as we do for other global state<br>
> changes: i.e check if changes are needed, then grab all crtc locks<br>
> to serialize the changes(Ville Syrjälä)<br>
> - Add crtc_sagv_mask caching in order to avoid needless recalculations<br>
> (Matthew Roper)<br>
> - Put back Gen12 SAGV switch in order to get it enabled in separate<br>
> patch(Matthew Roper)<br>
> - Rename *_set_sagv_mask to *_compute_sagv_mask(Matthew Roper)<br>
> - Check if there are no active pipes in intel_can_enable_sagv<br>
> instead of platform specific functions(Matthew Roper), same<br>
> for intel_has_sagv check.<br>
> <br>
> v9 - Switched to u8 for crtc_sagv_mask(Ville Syrjälä)<br>
> - crtc_sagv_mask now is pipe_sagv_mask(Ville Syrjälä)<br>
> - Extracted sagv checking logic from skl/icl/tgl_compute_sagv_mask<br>
> - Extracted skl_plane_wm_level function and passing latency to<br>
> separate patches(Ville Syrjälä)<br>
> - Removed part of unneeded copy-paste from tgl_check_pipe_fits_sagv_wm<br>
> (Ville Syrjälä)<br>
> - Now using simple assignment for sagv_wm0 as it contains only<br>
> pod types and no pointers(Ville Syrjälä)<br>
> - Fixed intel_can_enable_sagv not to do double duty, now it only<br>
> check SAGV bits by ANDing those between local and global state.<br>
> The SAGV masks are now computed after watermarks are available,<br>
> in order to be able to figure out if ddb ranges are fitting nicely.<br>
> (Ville Syrjälä)<br>
> - Now having uv_sagv_wm0 and sagv_wm0, otherwise we have wrong logic<br>
> when using skl_plane_wm_level accessor, as we had previously for<br>
> Gen11+ color plane and regular wm levels, so probably both<br>
> has to be recalculated with additional SAGV block time for Level 0.<br>
> <br>
> v10: - Starting to use new global state for storing pipe_sagv_mask<br>
> <br>
> v11: - Fixed rebase conflict with recent drm-tip<br>
> - Check if we really need to recalculate SAGV mask, otherwise<br>
> bail out without making any changes.<br>
> - Use cached SAGV result, instead of recalculating it everytime,<br>
> if bw_state hasn't changed.<br>
> <br>
> v12: - Removed WARN from intel_can_enable_sagv, in some of the commits<br>
> if we don't recalculated watermarks, bw_state is not recalculated,<br>
> thus leading to SAGV state not recalculated by the commit state,<br>
> which is still calling intel_can_enable_sagv function. Fix that<br>
> by just analyzing the current global bw_state object - because<br>
> we simply have no other objects related to that.<br>
> <br>
> v13: - Rebased, fixed warnings regarding long lines<br>
> - Changed function call sites from intel_atomic_bw* to<br>
> intel_wb_* as was suggested.(Jani Nikula)<br>
> - Taken ddb_state_changed and bw_state_changed into use.<br>
> <br>
> v14: - total_affected_planes is no longer needed to check for ddb changes,<br>
> just as active_pipe_changes.<br>
> <br>
> v15: - Fixed stupid mistake with uninitialized crtc in<br>
> skl_compute_sagv_mask.<br>
> <br>
> v16: - Convert pipe_sagv_mask to pipe_sagv_reject and now using inverted<br>
> flag to indicate SAGV readiness for the pipe(Ville Syrjälä)<br>
> - Added return value to intel_compute_sagv_mask which call<br>
> intel_atomic_serialize_global_state in order to properly<br>
> propagate EDEADLCK to drm.<br>
> - Based on the discussion with Ville, removed active_pipe_changes<br>
> check and also there seems to be no need for checking ddb_state_changes<br>
> as well. Instead we just iterate through crtcs in state - having<br>
> crtc in a state already guarantees that it is at least read-locked<br>
> Having additional flag to check if there actually were some plane<br>
> wm/ddb changes would be probably added later as an optimization.<br>
> - We can't get parent atomic state from crtc_state at commit stage<br>
> (nice drm feature), also propagating state through function call<br>
> chain seems to be overkill and not possible(cursor legacy updates)<br>
> Querying for bw_state object from global state is not possible as<br>
> it might get swapped with other global state.<br>
> So... just sticked can_sagv boolean into wm crtc state.<br>
> <br>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com><br>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@intel.com><br>
> Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus@intel.com><br>
> ---<br>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h | 18 +<br>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 23 +-<br>
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h | 3 +<br>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 314 ++++++++++++++++--<br>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h | 1 +<br>
> 5 files changed, 318 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)<br>
> <br>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h<br>
> index b5f61463922f..4083adf4b432 100644<br>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h<br>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h<br>
> @@ -18,6 +18,24 @@ struct intel_crtc_state;<br>
> struct intel_bw_state {<br>
> struct intel_global_state base;<br>
> <br>
> + /*<br>
> + * Contains a bit mask, used to determine, whether correspondent<br>
> + * pipe allows SAGV or not.<br>
> + */<br>
> + u8 pipe_sagv_reject;<br>
> +<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * Used to determine if we already had calculated<br>
> + * SAGV mask for this state once.<br>
> + */<br>
> + bool sagv_calculated;<br>
<br>
Why would we even attempt to calculate it many times?<br>
<br>
> +<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * Contains final SAGV decision based on current mask,<br>
> + * to prevent doing the same job over and over again.<br>
> + */<br>
> + bool can_sagv;<br>
<br>
This is redundant since it's just sagv_reject==0.<br>
<br>
> +<br>
> unsigned int data_rate[I915_MAX_PIPES];<br>
> u8 num_active_planes[I915_MAX_PIPES];<br>
> };<br>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c<br>
> index 8f23c4d51c33..9e0058a78ea6 100644<br>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c<br>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c<br>
> @@ -14010,7 +14010,10 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,<br>
> /* Watermarks */<br>
> for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {<br>
> if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],<br>
> - &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))<br>
> + &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||<br>
> + (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],<br>
> + &sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0) &&<br>
> + (level == 0)))<br>
<br>
Pointless parens. Also we should do the check as<br>
'level == 0 && wm_equals(sagv)' to skip the pointless comparison when<br>
level != 0.<br>
<br>
I guess we can't read out sagv state due to the silly pcode interface?<br>
<br>
> continue;<br>
> <br>
> drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,<br>
> @@ -14065,7 +14068,10 @@ static void verify_wm_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,<br>
> /* Watermarks */<br>
> for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {<br>
> if (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],<br>
> - &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]))<br>
> + &sw_plane_wm->wm[level]) ||<br>
> + (skl_wm_level_equals(&hw_plane_wm->wm[level],<br>
> + &sw_plane_wm->sagv_wm0) &&<br>
> + (level == 0)))<br>
> continue;<br>
> <br>
> drm_err(&dev_priv->drm,<br>
> @@ -15544,8 +15550,10 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> * SKL workaround: bspec recommends we disable the SAGV when we<br>
> * have more then one pipe enabled<br>
> */<br>
> - if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state))<br>
> - intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);<br>
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {<br>
> + if (!intel_can_enable_sagv(state))<br>
> + intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv);<br>
> + }<br>
> <br>
> intel_modeset_verify_disabled(dev_priv, state);<br>
> }<br>
> @@ -15645,8 +15653,10 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> if (state->modeset)<br>
> intel_verify_planes(state);<br>
> <br>
> - if (state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))<br>
> - intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);<br>
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11) {<br>
> + if (state->modeset && intel_can_enable_sagv(state))<br>
> + intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv);<br>
> + }<br>
> <br>
> drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(&state->base);<br>
> <br>
> @@ -15798,7 +15808,6 @@ static int intel_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,<br>
> <br>
> if (state->global_state_changed) {<br>
> assert_global_state_locked(dev_priv);<br>
> -<br>
> dev_priv->active_pipes = state->active_pipes;<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h<br>
> index 5e00e611f077..da0308b87dad 100644<br>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h<br>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h<br>
> @@ -669,11 +669,14 @@ struct skl_plane_wm {<br>
> struct skl_wm_level wm[8];<br>
> struct skl_wm_level uv_wm[8];<br>
> struct skl_wm_level trans_wm;<br>
> + struct skl_wm_level sagv_wm0;<br>
> + struct skl_wm_level uv_sagv_wm0;<br>
> bool is_planar;<br>
> };<br>
> <br>
> struct skl_pipe_wm {<br>
> struct skl_plane_wm planes[I915_MAX_PLANES];<br>
> + bool can_sagv;<br>
> };<br>
> <br>
> enum vlv_wm_level {<br>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c<br>
> index c72fa59a8302..f598b55f4abc 100644<br>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c<br>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c<br>
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@<br>
> #include "i915_fixed.h"<br>
> #include "i915_irq.h"<br>
> #include "i915_trace.h"<br>
> +#include "display/intel_bw.h"<br>
> #include "intel_pm.h"<br>
> #include "intel_sideband.h"<br>
> #include "../../../platform/x86/intel_ips.h"<br>
> @@ -3634,7 +3635,7 @@ static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)<br>
> return IS_GEN9_BC(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv);<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> -static bool<br>
> +bool<br>
> intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)<br>
> {<br>
> /* HACK! */<br>
> @@ -3757,39 +3758,25 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)<br>
> return 0;<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> -bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> +static bool skl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)<br>
<br>
This extraction looks to be trivially done as a separate patch.<br>
<br>
> {<br>
> - struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;<br>
> + struct drm_device *dev = crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev;<br>
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);<br>
> + struct intel_atomic_state *state = to_intel_atomic_state(crtc_state->uapi.state);<br>
> struct intel_crtc *crtc;<br>
> struct intel_plane *plane;<br>
> - struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;<br>
> - enum pipe pipe;<br>
> int level, latency;<br>
> <br>
> - if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))<br>
> - return false;<br>
> -<br>
> - /*<br>
> - * If there are no active CRTCs, no additional checks need be performed<br>
> - */<br>
> - if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) == 0)<br>
> - return true;<br>
> + crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->uapi.crtc);<br>
> <br>
> - /*<br>
> - * SKL+ workaround: bspec recommends we disable SAGV when we have<br>
> - * more then one pipe enabled<br>
> - */<br>
> - if (hweight8(state->active_pipes) > 1)<br>
> + if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) <= 9) && (hweight8(state->active_pipes) > 1))<br>
> return false;<br>
> <br>
> - /* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active CRTC... */<br>
> - pipe = ffs(state->active_pipes) - 1;<br>
> - crtc = intel_get_crtc_for_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);<br>
> - crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->base.state);<br>
> -<br>
> - if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE)<br>
> + if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) {<br>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV for interlaced mode on pipe %c\n",<br>
> + pipe_name(crtc->pipe));<br>
> return false;<br>
> + }<br>
> <br>
> for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) {<br>
> struct skl_plane_wm *wm =<br>
> @@ -3816,13 +3803,145 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> * incur memory latencies higher than sagv_block_time_us we<br>
> * can't enable SAGV.<br>
> */<br>
> - if (latency < dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us)<br>
> + if (latency < dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us) {<br>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Latency %d < sagv block time %d, no SAGV for pipe %c\n",<br>
> + latency, dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us, pipe_name(crtc->pipe));<br>
> return false;<br>
> + }<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> return true;<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> +static bool<br>
> +tgl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state);<br>
> +<br>
> +static bool intel_calculate_sagv_result(struct intel_bw_state *bw_state)<br>
> +{<br>
> + return bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject == 0;<br>
> +}<br>
> +<br>
> +static int intel_compute_sagv_mask(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> +{<br>
> + int ret;<br>
> + struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;<br>
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);<br>
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc;<br>
> + struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;<br>
> + struct intel_bw_state *new_bw_state = NULL;<br>
> + struct intel_bw_state *old_bw_state = NULL;<br>
> + int i;<br>
> +<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * If SAGV is not supported we just can't do anything<br>
> + * not even set or reject SAGV points - just bail out.<br>
> + * Thus avoid needless calculations.<br>
> + */<br>
> + if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))<br>
> + return 0;<br>
> +<br>
> + for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,<br>
> + new_crtc_state, i) {<br>
> + bool pipe_sagv_enable;<br>
> +<br>
> + new_bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);<br>
> + old_bw_state = intel_bw_get_old_state(state);<br>
> +<br>
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(new_bw_state) || IS_ERR_OR_NULL(old_bw_state)) {a<br>
> + WARN(1, "Could not get bw_state\n");<br>
> + return -EINVAL;<br>
<br>
What is this?<br>
<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + new_bw_state->sagv_calculated = false;<br>
> +<br>
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)<br>
> + pipe_sagv_enable = tgl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(new_crtc_state);<br>
> + else<br>
> + pipe_sagv_enable = skl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(new_crtc_state);<br>
> +<br>
> + if (pipe_sagv_enable)<br>
> + new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject &= ~BIT(crtc->pipe);<br>
> + else<br>
> + new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject |= BIT(crtc->pipe);<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + if (!new_bw_state || !old_bw_state)<br>
> + return 0;<br>
> +<br>
> + new_bw_state->can_sagv = intel_calculate_sagv_result(new_bw_state);<br>
> + new_bw_state->sagv_calculated = true;<br>
> +<br>
> + for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,<br>
> + new_crtc_state, i) {<br>
> + struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &new_crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;<br>
> +<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * Due to drm limitation at commit state, when<br>
> + * changes are written the whole atomic state is<br>
> + * zeroed away => which prevents from using it,<br>
> + * so just sticking it into pipe wm state for<br>
> + * keeping it simple - anyway this is related to wm.<br>
> + * Proper way in ideal universe would be of course not<br>
> + * to lose parent atomic state object from child crtc_state,<br>
> + * and stick to OOP programming principles, which had been<br>
> + * scientifically proven to work.<br>
> + */<br>
> + pipe_wm->can_sagv = new_bw_state->can_sagv;<br>
<br>
I would probably name that wm->can_sagv as wm->use_sagv_wm so it's clear<br>
what it does.<br>
<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * For SAGV we need to account all the pipes,<br>
> + * not only the ones which are in state currently.<br>
> + * Grab all locks if we detect that we are actually<br>
> + * going to do something.<br>
> + */<br>
> + if (new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject != old_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject) {<br>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("State %p: old sagv mask 0x%x, new sagv mask 0x%x\n",<br>
> + state,<br>
> + old_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject,<br>
> + new_bw_state->pipe_sagv_reject);<br>
> +<br>
> + ret = intel_atomic_serialize_global_state(&new_bw_state->base);<br>
> + if (ret) {<br>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Could not serialize global state\n");<br>
> + return ret;<br>
> + }<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + return 0;<br>
> +}<br>
> +<br>
> +/*<br>
> + * This function to be used before swap state<br>
> + */<br>
> +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> +{<br>
> + struct drm_device *dev = state->base.dev;<br>
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);<br>
> + struct intel_bw_state *bw_state;<br>
> +<br>
> + if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv)) {<br>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No SAGV support detected\n");<br>
> + return false;<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);<br>
> +<br>
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(bw_state)) {<br>
<br>
It can't be NULL. And if you get an error you must propagate it upwards.<br>
<br>
> + WARN(1, "Could not get bw_state\n");<br>
> + return false;<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> + if (bw_state->sagv_calculated)<br>
> + goto out;<br>
> +<br>
> + bw_state->can_sagv = intel_calculate_sagv_result(bw_state);<br>
> + bw_state->sagv_calculated = true;<br>
> +<br>
> +out:<br>
> + return bw_state->can_sagv;<br>
> +}<br>
> +<br>
> /*<br>
> * Calculate initial DBuf slice offset, based on slice size<br>
> * and mask(i.e if slice size is 1024 and second slice is enabled<br>
> @@ -4042,6 +4161,7 @@ skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,<br>
> u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level];<br>
> <br>
> skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, level, latency, &wp, &wm, &wm);<br>
> +<br>
<br>
Spurious whitespace.<br>
<br>
> if (wm.min_ddb_alloc == U16_MAX)<br>
> break;<br>
> <br>
> @@ -4556,9 +4676,83 @@ skl_plane_wm_level(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,<br>
> const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =<br>
> &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];<br>
> <br>
> + if (!level) {<br>
> + const struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm = &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal;<br>
<br>
Why is this here when &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal is already being used<br>
higher up?<br>
<br>
> +<br>
> + if (pipe_wm->can_sagv)<br>
> + return color_plane == 0 ? &wm->sagv_wm0 : &wm->uv_sagv_wm0;<br>
> + }<br>
> +<br>
> return color_plane == 0 ? &wm->wm[level] : &wm->uv_wm[level];<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> +static bool<br>
> +tgl_can_enable_sagv_on_pipe(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)<br>
> +{<br>
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = crtc_state->uapi.crtc;<br>
<br>
Pls don't use the annoying drm_ types.<br>
<br>
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->dev);<br>
> + struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc);<br>
> + struct skl_ddb_entry *alloc = &crtc_state->wm.skl.ddb;<br>
> + u16 alloc_size;<br>
> + u64 total_data_rate;<br>
> + enum plane_id plane_id;<br>
> + int num_active;<br>
> + u64 plane_data_rate[I915_MAX_PLANES] = {};<br>
> + u32 blocks;<br>
> +<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * If pipe is not active it can't affect SAGV rejection<br>
> + * Checking it here is needed to leave only cases when<br>
> + * alloc_size is 0 for any other reasons, except inactive<br>
> + * pipe. As inactive pipe is fine, however having no ddb<br>
> + * space available is already problematic - so need to<br>
> + * to separate those.<br>
> + */<br>
<br>
Can't figure out what this comment is trying to say or why it's here.<br>
<br>
> + if (!crtc_state->hw.active)<br>
> + return true;<br>
> +<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * No need to check gen here, we call this only for gen12<br>
> + */<br>
> + total_data_rate =<br>
> + icl_get_total_relative_data_rate(crtc_state,<br>
> + plane_data_rate);<br>
> +<br>
> + skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(dev_priv, crtc_state,<br>
> + total_data_rate,<br>
> + alloc, &num_active);<br>
> + alloc_size = skl_ddb_entry_size(alloc);<br>
<br>
Don't we already have this in the crtc state?<br>
<br>
> + if (alloc_size == 0)<br>
> + return false;<br>
<br>
I don't think that can happen.<br>
<br>
> +<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * Do check if we can fit L0 + sagv_block_time and<br>
> + * disable SAGV if we can't.<br>
> + */<br>
> + blocks = 0;<br>
> + for_each_plane_id_on_crtc(intel_crtc, plane_id) {<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * The only place, where we can't use skl_plane_wm_level<br>
> + * accessor, because if actually calls intel_can_enable_sagv<br>
> + * which depends on that function.<br>
> + */<br>
> + const struct skl_plane_wm *wm =<br>
> + &crtc_state->wm.skl.optimal.planes[plane_id];<br>
> +<br>
> + blocks += wm->sagv_wm0.min_ddb_alloc;<br>
> + blocks += wm->uv_sagv_wm0.min_ddb_alloc;<br>
> +<br>
> + if (blocks > alloc_size) {<br>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Not enough ddb blocks(%d<%d) for SAGV on pipe %c\n",<br>
> + alloc_size, blocks, pipe_name(intel_crtc->pipe));<br>
> + return false;<br>
> + }<br>
> + }<br>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%d total blocks required for SAGV, ddb entry size %d\n",<br>
> + blocks, alloc_size);<br>
> + return true;<br>
> +}<br>
> +<br>
> static int<br>
> skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)<br>
> {<br>
> @@ -5140,11 +5334,19 @@ static void skl_compute_plane_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,<br>
> static void<br>
> skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,<br>
> const struct skl_wm_params *wm_params,<br>
> - struct skl_wm_level *levels)<br>
> + struct skl_plane_wm *plane_wm,<br>
> + bool yuv)<br>
> {<br>
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc_state->uapi.crtc->dev);<br>
> int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv);<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * Check which kind of plane is it and based on that calculate<br>
> + * correspondent WM levels.<br>
> + */<br>
> + struct skl_wm_level *levels = yuv ? plane_wm->uv_wm : plane_wm->wm;<br>
> struct skl_wm_level *result_prev = &levels[0];<br>
> + struct skl_wm_level *sagv_wm = yuv ?<br>
> + &plane_wm->uv_sagv_wm0 : &plane_wm->sagv_wm0;<br>
> <br>
> for (level = 0; level <= max_level; level++) {<br>
> struct skl_wm_level *result = &levels[level];<br>
> @@ -5155,6 +5357,27 @@ skl_compute_wm_levels(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,<br>
> <br>
> result_prev = result;<br>
> }<br>
> + /*<br>
> + * For Gen12 if it is an L0 we need to also<br>
> + * consider sagv_block_time when calculating<br>
> + * L0 watermark - we will need that when making<br>
> + * a decision whether enable SAGV or not.<br>
> + * For older gens we agreed to copy L0 value for<br>
> + * compatibility.<br>
> + */<br>
> + if ((INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 12)) {<br>
> + u32 latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[0];<br>
> +<br>
> + latency += dev_priv->sagv_block_time_us;<br>
> + skl_compute_plane_wm(crtc_state, 0, latency,<br>
> + wm_params, &levels[0],<br>
> + sagv_wm);<br>
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%d L0 blocks required for SAGV vs %d for non-SAGV\n",<br>
> + sagv_wm->min_ddb_alloc, levels[0].min_ddb_alloc);<br>
> + } else {<br>
> + /* Since all members are POD */<br>
> + *sagv_wm = levels[0];<br>
> + }<br>
<br>
I was thinking more along the lines of<br>
<br>
skl_compute_wm_levels();<br>
skl_compute_transition_wm();<br>
+ skl_compute_sagv_wm();<br>
<br>
<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> static void skl_compute_transition_wm(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,<br>
> @@ -5237,7 +5460,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_single(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,<br>
> if (ret)<br>
> return ret;<br>
> <br>
> - skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm->wm);<br>
> + skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm, false);<br>
> skl_compute_transition_wm(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm);<br>
> <br>
> return 0;<br>
> @@ -5259,7 +5482,7 @@ static int skl_build_plane_wm_uv(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,<br>
> if (ret)<br>
> return ret;<br>
> <br>
> - skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm->uv_wm);<br>
> + skl_compute_wm_levels(crtc_state, &wm_params, wm, true);<br>
> <br>
> return 0;<br>
> }<br>
> @@ -5598,9 +5821,25 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(&dev_priv->drm, crtc, plane) {<br>
> enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id;<br>
> const struct skl_plane_wm *old_wm, *new_wm;<br>
> + const struct skl_wm_level *old_wm_level, *new_wm_level;<br>
> + u16 old_plane_res_l, new_plane_res_l;<br>
> + u8 old_plane_res_b, new_plane_res_b;<br>
> + u16 old_min_ddb_alloc, new_min_ddb_alloc;<br>
> + int color_plane = 0;<br>
> <br>
> old_wm = &old_pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];<br>
> new_wm = &new_pipe_wm->planes[plane_id];<br>
> + old_wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(old_crtc_state, plane_id, 0, color_plane);<br>
> + new_wm_level = skl_plane_wm_level(new_crtc_state, plane_id, 0, color_plane);<br>
> +<br>
> + old_plane_res_l = old_wm_level->plane_res_l;<br>
> + old_plane_res_b = old_wm_level->plane_res_b;<br>
> +<br>
> + new_plane_res_l = new_wm_level->plane_res_l;<br>
> + new_plane_res_b = new_wm_level->plane_res_b;<br>
> +<br>
> + old_min_ddb_alloc = old_wm_level->min_ddb_alloc;<br>
> + new_min_ddb_alloc = new_wm_level->min_ddb_alloc;<br>
> <br>
> if (skl_plane_wm_equals(dev_priv, old_wm, new_wm))<br>
> continue;<br>
> @@ -5624,7 +5863,7 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> "[PLANE:%d:%s] lines %c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d"<br>
> " -> %c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d,%c%3d\n",<br>
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,<br>
> - enast(old_wm->wm[0].ignore_lines), old_wm->wm[0].plane_res_l,<br>
> + enast(old_wm->wm[0].ignore_lines), old_plane_res_l,<br>
> enast(old_wm->wm[1].ignore_lines), old_wm->wm[1].plane_res_l,<br>
> enast(old_wm->wm[2].ignore_lines), old_wm->wm[2].plane_res_l,<br>
> enast(old_wm->wm[3].ignore_lines), old_wm->wm[3].plane_res_l,<br>
> @@ -5634,7 +5873,7 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> enast(old_wm->wm[7].ignore_lines), old_wm->wm[7].plane_res_l,<br>
> enast(old_wm->trans_wm.ignore_lines), old_wm->trans_wm.plane_res_l,<br>
> <br>
> - enast(new_wm->wm[0].ignore_lines), new_wm->wm[0].plane_res_l,<br>
> + enast(new_wm->wm[0].ignore_lines), new_plane_res_l,<br>
> enast(new_wm->wm[1].ignore_lines), new_wm->wm[1].plane_res_l,<br>
> enast(new_wm->wm[2].ignore_lines), new_wm->wm[2].plane_res_l,<br>
> enast(new_wm->wm[3].ignore_lines), new_wm->wm[3].plane_res_l,<br>
> @@ -5648,12 +5887,12 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> "[PLANE:%d:%s] blocks %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d"<br>
> " -> %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d\n",<br>
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,<br>
> - old_wm->wm[0].plane_res_b, old_wm->wm[1].plane_res_b,<br>
> + old_plane_res_b, old_wm->wm[1].plane_res_b,<br>
> old_wm->wm[2].plane_res_b, old_wm->wm[3].plane_res_b,<br>
> old_wm->wm[4].plane_res_b, old_wm->wm[5].plane_res_b,<br>
> old_wm->wm[6].plane_res_b, old_wm->wm[7].plane_res_b,<br>
> old_wm->trans_wm.plane_res_b,<br>
> - new_wm->wm[0].plane_res_b, new_wm->wm[1].plane_res_b,<br>
> + new_plane_res_b, new_wm->wm[1].plane_res_b,<br>
> new_wm->wm[2].plane_res_b, new_wm->wm[3].plane_res_b,<br>
> new_wm->wm[4].plane_res_b, new_wm->wm[5].plane_res_b,<br>
> new_wm->wm[6].plane_res_b, new_wm->wm[7].plane_res_b,<br>
> @@ -5663,12 +5902,12 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> "[PLANE:%d:%s] min_ddb %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d"<br>
> " -> %4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d,%4d\n",<br>
> plane->base.base.id, plane->base.name,<br>
> - old_wm->wm[0].min_ddb_alloc, old_wm->wm[1].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> + old_min_ddb_alloc, old_wm->wm[1].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> old_wm->wm[2].min_ddb_alloc, old_wm->wm[3].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> old_wm->wm[4].min_ddb_alloc, old_wm->wm[5].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> old_wm->wm[6].min_ddb_alloc, old_wm->wm[7].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> old_wm->trans_wm.min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> - new_wm->wm[0].min_ddb_alloc, new_wm->wm[1].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> + new_min_ddb_alloc, new_wm->wm[1].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> new_wm->wm[2].min_ddb_alloc, new_wm->wm[3].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> new_wm->wm[4].min_ddb_alloc, new_wm->wm[5].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
> new_wm->wm[6].min_ddb_alloc, new_wm->wm[7].min_ddb_alloc,<br>
<br>
Here too I think the sagv wm should be treated more or less like the<br>
transition wm (ie. just printed as an extra).<br>
<br>
> @@ -5829,6 +6068,10 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct intel_atomic_state *state)<br>
> return ret;<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> + ret = intel_compute_sagv_mask(state);<br>
> + if (ret)<br>
> + return ret;<br>
<br>
This seems too early. We haven't even computed the ddb yet.<br>
<br>
> +<br>
> ret = skl_compute_ddb(state);<br>
> if (ret)<br>
> return ret;<br>
> @@ -5960,6 +6203,9 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,<br>
> val = I915_READ(CUR_WM(pipe, level));<br>
> <br>
> skl_wm_level_from_reg_val(val, &wm->wm[level]);<br>
> + if (level == 0)<br>
> + memcpy(&wm->sagv_wm0, &wm->wm[level],<br>
> + sizeof(struct skl_wm_level));<br>
> }<br>
> <br>
> if (plane_id != PLANE_CURSOR)<br>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h<br>
> index d60a85421c5a..65743a4cbcf6 100644<br>
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h<br>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.h<br>
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ void skl_pipe_wm_get_hw_state(struct intel_crtc *crtc,<br>
> void g4x_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);<br>
> void vlv_wm_sanitize(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);<br>
> bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct intel_atomic_state *state);<br>
> +bool intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);<br>
> int intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);<br>
> int intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);<br>
> bool skl_wm_level_equals(const struct skl_wm_level *l1,<br>
> -- <br>
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Ville Syrjälä<br>
Intel<br>
</div>
</span></font>
</body>
</html>