<!DOCTYPE html><html><head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> </head> <body> Am 17.10.24 um 18:43 schrieb Rodrigo Vivi: <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:ZxE-x6osh_jFHl5X@intel.com"> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:59:10AM +0200, Christian König wrote: </pre> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <blockquote type="cite"> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap=""> Purpose of this implementation is to provide drivers a generic way to recover with the help of userspace intervention. Different drivers may have different ideas of a "wedged device" depending on their hardware implementation, and hence the vendor agnostic nature of the event. It is up to the drivers to decide when they see the need for recovery and how they want to recover from the available methods. Current implementation defines three recovery methods, out of which, drivers can choose to support any one or multiple of them. Preferred recovery method will be sent in the uevent environment as WEDGED=<method>. Userspace consumers (sysadmin) can define udev rules to parse this event and take respective action to recover the device. =============== ================================== Recovery method Consumer expectations =============== ================================== rebind unbind + rebind driver bus-reset unbind + reset bus device + rebind reboot reboot system =============== ================================== </pre> </blockquote> </blockquote> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap=""> Well that sounds like userspace would need to be involved in recovery. That in turn is a complete no-go since we at least need to signal all dma_fences to unblock the kernel. In other words things like bus reset needs to happen inside the kernel and *not* in userspace. What we can do is to signal to userspace: Hey a bus reset of device X happened, maybe restart container, daemon, whatever service which was using this device. </pre> </blockquote> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap=""> Well, when we declare device 'wedged' it is because we don't want to take any drastic measures inside the kernel and want to leave it in a protected and unusable state. In a way that users wouldn't lose display for instance, or at least the device is in a debugable state.</pre> </blockquote> Uff, that needs to be very very well documented or otherwise the whole approach is an absolutely clear NAK from my side as DMA-buf maintainer. <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:ZxE-x6osh_jFHl5X@intel.com"> <pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap=""> Then, the instructions here is to tell what could possibly be attempted from userspace to get the device to an usable state. The 'wedge' mode (the one emiting this uevent) needs to be responsible for signaling all the fences and everything needed for a clean unbind and whatever next step might be indicated to userspace. That should already be part of any wedged mode, regardless the uevent to inform the userspace here.</pre> </blockquote> You need to approach that from a different side. With the current patch set you are ignoring documented mandatory driver behavior as far as I can see. So first of all describe in the documentation what the wedged mode is and what requirements a driver has to fulfill to enter it: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://docs.kernel.org/gpu/drm-uapi.html#device-reset">https://docs.kernel.org/gpu/drm-uapi.html#device-reset</a> Especially document that all system memory accesses of the device needs to be blocked by (for example) disabling DMA accesses in the PCI config space. When it is guaranteed that the device can't access any system memory any more the device driver should signal all pending fences of this device. And only after all of that is done the driver can send an uevent to inform userspace that it can debug the hanged state. As far as I can see this makes the enum how to recover the device superfluous because you will most likely always need a bus reset to get out of this again. Regards, Christian. </body> </html>