[PATCH 5/6] drm/i915/gvt: Refine error handling path in dispatch_workload

Zhenyu Wang zhenyuw at linux.intel.com
Wed Aug 9 03:19:01 UTC 2017


On 2017.08.08 23:31:04 +0800, fred gao wrote:
> When an error occurs in dispatch_workload, this patch is to do the
> proper cleanup and rollback to the original states before the workload
> is abandoned.
> 
> v2:
> - split the mixed several error paths for better review. (Zhenyu)
> 
> Signed-off-by: fred gao <fred.gao at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
> index 273a275..db49a61 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
> @@ -188,16 +188,17 @@ static int copy_workload_to_ring_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
>  {
>  	struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = workload->vgpu;
>  	int ring_id = workload->ring_id;
> -	struct i915_gem_context *shadow_ctx = vgpu->shadow_ctx;
>  	void *shadow_ring_buffer_va;
>  	u32 *cs;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	/* allocate shadow ring buffer */
>  	cs = intel_ring_begin(workload->req, workload->rb_len / sizeof(u32));
>  	if (IS_ERR(cs)) {
>  		gvt_vgpu_err("fail to alloc size =%ld shadow  ring buffer\n",
>  			workload->rb_len);
> -		return PTR_ERR(cs);
> +		ret = PTR_ERR(cs);
> +		goto out;
>  	}

Not need this change and original return is good enough.

>  
>  	shadow_ring_buffer_va = workload->shadow_ring_buffer_va;
> @@ -211,10 +212,10 @@ static int copy_workload_to_ring_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
>  	cs += workload->rb_len / sizeof(u32);
>  	intel_ring_advance(workload->req, cs);
>  
> -	return 0;
> +out:
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -
>  /**
>   * intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_workload - audit the workload by scanning and
>   * shadow it as well, include ringbuffer,wa_ctx and ctx.
> @@ -243,13 +244,13 @@ int intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
>  
>  	ret = intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_ringbuffer(workload);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto out;
> +		goto err_scan;
>  
>  	if ((workload->ring_id == RCS) &&
>  	    (workload->wa_ctx.indirect_ctx.size != 0)) {
>  		ret = intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_wa_ctx(&workload->wa_ctx);
>  		if (ret)
> -			goto out;
> +			goto err_scan;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* pin shadow context by gvt even the shadow context will be pinned
> @@ -268,28 +269,61 @@ int intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
>  
>  	ret = populate_shadow_context(workload);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto err_shadow;
> +		goto err_unpin;
>  
>  	rq = i915_gem_request_alloc(dev_priv->engine[ring_id], shadow_ctx);
>  	if (IS_ERR(rq)) {
>  		gvt_vgpu_err("fail to allocate gem request\n");
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(rq);
> -		goto err_shadow;
> +		goto err_unpin;
>  	}
>  
>  	gvt_dbg_sched("ring id %d get i915 gem request %p\n", ring_id, rq);
>  
>  	workload->req = i915_gem_request_get(rq);
> -	copy_workload_to_ring_buffer(workload);
> +	ret = copy_workload_to_ring_buffer(workload);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err_copy;

This handle should be added in previous patch in this series that adds "copy_workload_to_ring_buffer"
instead of extra patch to fix that.

>  
>  	workload->shadowed = true;
> +	return 0;
>  
> +err_copy:
> +	i915_add_request(workload->req);
> +	workload->req = NULL;
> +err_unpin:
> +	engine->context_unpin(engine, shadow_ctx);
>  err_shadow:
>  	intel_gvt_release_shadow_wa_ctx(&workload->wa_ctx);
> -out:
> +err_scan:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_gvt_release_shadow_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
> +{
> +	int ring_id = workload->ring_id;
> +	struct intel_vgpu *vgpu = workload->vgpu;
> +	struct i915_gem_context *shadow_ctx = vgpu->shadow_ctx;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = vgpu->gvt->dev_priv;
> +	struct intel_engine_cs *engine = dev_priv->engine[ring_id];
> +
> +	/* error happened in workload->prepare, so shaodwed */
> +	if (!workload->shadowed)
> +		return;
> +
> +	/* free the dynamical ring buffer every time to save the memory */
> +	if (vgpu->dynamic_ring_buffer_va[ring_id]) {
> +		free_pages((unsigned long)vgpu->dynamic_ring_buffer_va[ring_id],
> +				get_order(workload->rb_len));
> +		 vgpu->dynamic_ring_buffer_va[workload->ring_id] = NULL;
> +	}

What's this? Have you tested this series?

> +
> +	i915_add_request(workload->req);
> +	workload->req = NULL;
> +	engine->context_unpin(engine, shadow_ctx);
> +	intel_gvt_release_shadow_wa_ctx(&workload->wa_ctx);
> +}
> +
>  static int dispatch_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
>  {
>  	int ring_id = workload->ring_id;
> @@ -303,15 +337,18 @@ static int dispatch_workload(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload)
>  
>  	ret = intel_gvt_scan_and_shadow_workload(workload);
>  	if (ret)
> -		goto out;
> +		goto err_scan;
>  
>  	if (workload->prepare) {
>  		ret = workload->prepare(workload);
>  		if (ret)
> -			goto out;
> +			goto err_shadow;
>  	}
>  
> -out:
> +err_shadow:
> +	if (ret)
> +		intel_gvt_release_shadow_workload(workload);
> +err_scan:
>  	if (ret)
>  		workload->status = ret;
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> intel-gvt-dev mailing list
> intel-gvt-dev at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gvt-dev

-- 
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.

$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 195 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gvt-dev/attachments/20170809/87246862/attachment.sig>


More information about the intel-gvt-dev mailing list