[PATCH v3] drm/i915/gvt: add a spin_lock to protect the current_workload
Chuanxiao Dong
chuanxiao.dong at intel.com
Thu Feb 16 08:43:27 UTC 2017
There is a corner case which can cause kernel panic after a GPU reset.
The reason for this kernel panic is that, sometimes there is still a
context switch comes from HW to notify SW for a failed workload. But
as it is a failed workload, GVT has already freed this workload and
the current_workload in scheduler is NULL. Accessing NULL caused kernel
panic. So this issue is caused by unsynchronized between the workload
free and unexpected notification handling.
To protect the current_workload, add a spin_lock. So it can provide a
chance for SW to synchronize with each other to avoid such kind of
conflict.
v2: update the commit message;
add EINPROGRESS check for workload->status
v3: make the status check gracefully
Signed-off-by: Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
index d6b6d0e..64557b9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c
@@ -136,8 +136,30 @@ static int shadow_context_status_change(struct notifier_block *nb,
(struct drm_i915_gem_request *)data;
struct intel_gvt_workload_scheduler *scheduler =
&vgpu->gvt->scheduler;
- struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload =
- scheduler->current_workload[req->engine->id];
+ struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&scheduler->cur_workload_lock, flags);
+ workload = scheduler->current_workload[req->engine->id];
+ /* Sometimes a failed workload still has this notification
+ * from HW side.
+ * So at this point, the failed workload may
+ * already been freed. In this case, do nothing. Even the
+ * failed workload is not freed yet, still do nothing.
+ *
+ * Another case, when we goes here, this workload is actually
+ * a new workload already and we cannot do the context schedule
+ * out based on the last failed one.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(!workload ||
+ ((workload->status && (workload->status != -EINPROGRESS)) ||
+ vgpu->resetting) ||
+ (action == INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_OUT &&
+ !atomic_read(&workload->shadow_ctx_active)))) {
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&scheduler->cur_workload_lock, flags);
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&scheduler->cur_workload_lock, flags);
switch (action) {
case INTEL_CONTEXT_SCHEDULE_IN:
@@ -353,6 +375,7 @@ static void complete_current_workload(struct intel_gvt *gvt, int ring_id)
struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload;
struct intel_vgpu *vgpu;
int event;
+ unsigned long flags;
mutex_lock(&gvt->lock);
@@ -373,7 +396,9 @@ static void complete_current_workload(struct intel_gvt *gvt, int ring_id)
gvt_dbg_sched("ring id %d complete workload %p status %d\n",
ring_id, workload, workload->status);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&scheduler->cur_workload_lock, flags);
scheduler->current_workload[ring_id] = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&scheduler->cur_workload_lock, flags);
list_del_init(&workload->list);
workload->complete(workload);
@@ -514,6 +539,7 @@ int intel_gvt_init_workload_scheduler(struct intel_gvt *gvt)
gvt_dbg_core("init workload scheduler\n");
+ spin_lock_init(&scheduler->cur_workload_lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&scheduler->workload_complete_wq);
for (i = 0; i < I915_NUM_ENGINES; i++) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.h
index 2833dfa..b446ea9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.h
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ struct intel_gvt_workload_scheduler {
struct intel_vgpu *current_vgpu;
struct intel_vgpu *next_vgpu;
struct intel_vgpu_workload *current_workload[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
+ /* For current_workload handling sync */
+ spinlock_t cur_workload_lock;
bool need_reschedule;
wait_queue_head_t workload_complete_wq;
--
2.7.4
More information about the intel-gvt-dev
mailing list