[PATCH 2/6] i915/gvt/kvm: a NULL ->mm does not mean a thread is a kthread
Christoph Hellwig
hch at lst.de
Mon Apr 13 13:27:30 UTC 2020
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 11:08:46PM -0400, Yan Zhao wrote:
> hi
> we were removing this code. see
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200313031109.7989-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com/
This didn't make 5.7-rc1.
> The implementation of vfio_dma_rw() has been in vfio next tree.
> https://github.com/awilliam/linux-vfio/commit/8d46c0cca5f4dc0538173d62cd36b1119b5105bc
This made 5.7-rc1, so I'll update the series to take it into account.
T
> in vfio_dma_rw(), we still use
> bool kthread = current->mm == NULL.
> because if current->mm != NULL and current->flags & PF_KTHREAD, instead
> of calling use_mm(), we first check if (current->mm == mm) and allow copy_to_user() if it's true.
>
> Do you think it's all right?
I can't think of another way for a kernel thread to have a mm indeed.
More information about the intel-gvt-dev
mailing list