[Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/42] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out of the main _max_lane_count() func

[Kandpal, Suraj]

> >> Subject: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/42] drm/i915/tc: move legacy code out
> >> of the main _max_lane_count() func
> >>
> >> From: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho at intel.com>
> >>
> >> This makes the code a bit more symmetric and readable, especially
> >> when we start adding more display version-specific alternatives.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho at intel.com>
> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230721111121.369227-4-
> >> luciano.coelho at intel.com
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c | 32
> >> +++++++++++++++----------
> >>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> >> index de848b329f4b..43b8eeba26f8 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
> >> @@ -311,23 +311,12 @@ static int
> >> mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(struct
> >> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> >>  	}
> >>  }
> >>
> >> -int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port
> >> *dig_port)
> >> +static int intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(struct
> >> +intel_digital_port
> >> +*dig_port)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> >> -	struct intel_tc_port *tc = to_tc_port(dig_port);
> >> -	enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, dig_port->base.port);
> >>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> >> -	u32 lane_mask;
> >> -
> >> -	if (!intel_phy_is_tc(i915, phy) || tc->mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
> >> -		return 4;
> >> +	u32 lane_mask = 0;
> >>
> >> -	assert_tc_cold_blocked(tc);
> >> -
> >> -	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
> >> -		return mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
> >> -
> >> -	lane_mask = 0;
> >>  	with_intel_display_power(i915, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE,
> >> wakeref)
> >>  		lane_mask = intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(dig_port);
> >>
> >> @@ -348,6 +337,23 @@ int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct
> >> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
> >>  	}
> >>  }
> >
> >Rather than having two functions:
> >mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count()
> >& intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count() that both call:
> >with_intel_display_power(i915, POWER_DOMAIN_DISPLAY_CORE, wakeref)
> >                lane_mask = intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(dig_port);
> >to get the lane mask the us directly pass the lane_mask to the above
> >two functions and make the call for getting the lane_mask common i.e
> >lets call it in intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count().
> 
> Maybe, but I will let this to be decided between you and Luca. Pasting from
> the cover letter:
> 
>          3. Patches 7 through 10 can also be ignored: they are not
>             applied yet, but being reviewed in other patch series by its
>             author[2].
> 
>          [2] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/120980/
> 
> The only reason I added them here is that since this series will take some time
> to be applied, I figured it would be better not to create unnecessary conflicts. I
> expect these patches to merge soon so I will just drop them in the next
> revision of this series.
> 
> thanks
> Lucas De Marchi
> 

Ohk got it.

Regards,
Suraj Kandpal
> >
> >Regards,
> >Suraj Kandpal
> >>
> >> +int intel_tc_port_fia_max_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port
> >> +*dig_port) {
> >> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port->base.base.dev);
> >> +	struct intel_tc_port *tc = to_tc_port(dig_port);
> >> +	enum phy phy = intel_port_to_phy(i915, dig_port->base.port);
> >> +
> >> +	if (!intel_phy_is_tc(i915, phy) || tc->mode != TC_PORT_DP_ALT)
> >> +		return 4;
> >> +
> >> +	assert_tc_cold_blocked(tc);
> >> +
> >> +	if (DISPLAY_VER(i915) >= 14)
> >> +		return mtl_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
> >> +
> >> +	return intel_tc_port_get_max_lane_count(dig_port);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >>  void intel_tc_port_set_fia_lane_count(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port,
> >>  				      int required_lanes)
> >>  {
> >> --
> >> 2.40.1
> >