[Intel-xe] [PATCH 36/42] drm/i915/lnl: Add support for CDCLK initialization sequence
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Tue Aug 29 22:21:56 UTC 2023
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 04:54:57PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 10:07:34AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> From: Ravi Kumar Vodapalli <ravi.kumar.vodapalli at intel.com>
>>
>> Add CDCLK initialization sequence changes and CDCLK set frequency
>> sequence for LNL platform.
>>
>> CDCLK frequency change sequence is different for LNL compared to MTL
>> when a change in mdclk/cdclk ratio is observed. Below are changes to be
>> made:
>>
>> 1. In MBUS_CTL register translation Throttle Min value.
>> 2. In DBUF_CTL_S* register Min Tracker State Service value.
>
>The previous patch just did these same changes, but made the changes to
>the existing functions. It looks like we wound up with two patches
>doing the same thing?
The change here is because now during the squash phase there is
extra programming steps touching DBUF_CTL_S and MBUS_CTL. It doesn't
seem good we have this in 2 different places though. Ravi / Stan, any
comment here?
Lucas De Marchi
>
>>
>> BSpec: 68846, 68864
>> Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Vodapalli <ravi.kumar.vodapalli at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 2 +
>> 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
>> index aa1000db3cb9..4d8b960389ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_cdclk.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>> #include "intel_pcode.h"
>> #include "intel_psr.h"
>> #include "skl_watermark.h"
>> +#include "skl_watermark_regs.h"
>> #include "vlv_sideband.h"
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -1727,7 +1728,12 @@ static void adlp_cdclk_pll_crawl(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int vco)
>>
>> static u32 bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe)
>> {
>> - if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
>> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20) {
>> + if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
>> + return LNL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
>> + else
>> + return LNL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe);
>
>I don't think this change is correct; see note farther down on the
>register definitions.
>
>> + } else if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12) {
>> if (pipe == INVALID_PIPE)
>> return TGL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE;
>> else
>> @@ -1837,6 +1843,47 @@ static int get_mdclk_cdclk_ratio(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> return 1;
>> }
>>
>> +static void lnl_prog_mbus_dbuf_ctrl(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config)
>> +{
>> + int min_throttle_val;
>> + int min_tracker_state;
>> + enum dbuf_slice slice;
>> + int mdclk_cdclk_div_ratio;
>> + int mbus_join = intel_de_read(i915, MBUS_CTL) & MBUS_JOIN;
>> +
>> + mdclk_cdclk_div_ratio = get_mdclk_cdclk_ratio(i915, cdclk_config);
>> +
>> + min_throttle_val = MBUS_TRANS_THROTTLE_MIN_SELECT(mdclk_cdclk_div_ratio);
>> +
>> + intel_de_rmw(i915, MBUS_CTL, MBUS_TRANS_THROTTLE_MIN_MASK, min_throttle_val);
>> +
>> + if (mbus_join)
>> + mdclk_cdclk_div_ratio = (mdclk_cdclk_div_ratio << 1) + 1;
>> +
>> + min_tracker_state = DBUF_MIN_TRACKER_STATE_SERVICE(mdclk_cdclk_div_ratio);
>> +
>> + for_each_dbuf_slice(i915, slice)
>> + intel_de_rmw(i915, DBUF_CTL_S(slice),
>> + DBUF_MIN_TRACKER_STATE_SERVICE_MASK,
>> + min_tracker_state);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void lnl_cdclk_squash_program(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> + const struct intel_cdclk_config *cdclk_config,
>> + u16 waveform)
>> +{
>> + if (cdclk_config->cdclk < i915->display.cdclk.hw.cdclk)
>> + /* Program mbus_ctrl and dbuf_ctrl registers as Pre hook */
>> + lnl_prog_mbus_dbuf_ctrl(i915, cdclk_config);
>> +
>> + dg2_cdclk_squash_program(i915, waveform);
>> +
>> + if (cdclk_config->cdclk > i915->display.cdclk.hw.cdclk)
>> + /* Program mbus_ctrl and dbuf_ctrl registers as Post hook */
>> + lnl_prog_mbus_dbuf_ctrl(i915, cdclk_config);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int cdclk_squash_divider(u16 waveform)
>> {
>> return hweight16(waveform ?: 0xffff);
>> @@ -1938,8 +1985,13 @@ static void _bxt_set_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>> else
>> clock = cdclk;
>>
>> - if (HAS_CDCLK_SQUASH(dev_priv))
>> - dg2_cdclk_squash_program(dev_priv, waveform);
>> + if (HAS_CDCLK_SQUASH(dev_priv)) {
>> + if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 20)
>> + lnl_cdclk_squash_program(dev_priv, cdclk_config,
>> + waveform);
>> + else
>> + dg2_cdclk_squash_program(dev_priv, waveform);
>> + }
>>
>> val = bxt_cdclk_cd2x_div_sel(dev_priv, clock, vco) |
>> bxt_cdclk_cd2x_pipe(dev_priv, pipe);
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index d5850761a75a..c9639f0f4f49 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -5944,6 +5944,8 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>> #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe) << 20)
>> #define CDCLK_DIVMUX_CD_OVERRIDE (1 << 19)
>> #define BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(3)
>> +#define LNL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) ((pipe) << 19)
>
>This doesn't match what I see on bspec 69090:
>
>Bits 21:19
> 000 => Pipe A
> 010 => Pipe B
> 100 => Pipe C
> 110 => Pipe D
>
>So the pipe ID (0-3) should actually be shifted by 20 since bit 19 is
>always 0 (except for the "none" case). I think
>
>
>Matt
>
>> +#define LNL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE (7 << 19)
>> #define ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) (_PICK(pipe, 0, 2, 6) << 19)
>> #define ICL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE_NONE (7 << 19)
>> #define TGL_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe) BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_PIPE(pipe)
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>
>
>--
>Matt Roper
>Graphics Software Engineer
>Linux GPU Platform Enablement
>Intel Corporation
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list