[Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/xe/pmu: Enable PMU interface

Aravind Iddamsetty aravind.iddamsetty at linux.intel.com
Thu Aug 31 10:29:11 UTC 2023


On 31/08/23 10:18, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:

Hi Ashutosh,

> On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 22:15:44 -0700, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
> Hi Aravind,
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..41dd422812ff
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pmu.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,679 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
>> +#include <drm/drm_managed.h>
>> +#include <drm/xe_drm.h>
>> +
>> +#include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
>> +#include "xe_device.h"
>> +#include "xe_gt_clock.h"
>> +#include "xe_mmio.h"
>> +
>> +static cpumask_t xe_pmu_cpumask;
>> +static unsigned int xe_pmu_target_cpu = -1;
>> +
>> +static unsigned int config_gt_id(const u64 config)
>> +{
>> +	return config >> __XE_PMU_GT_SHIFT;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u64 config_counter(const u64 config)
>> +{
>> +	return config & ~(~0ULL << __XE_PMU_GT_SHIFT);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int engine_busyness_sample_type(u64 config)
>> +{
>> +	int type = 0;
> Why initialize? The switch statement should have a default with a BUG/WARN_ON
> below? Also see the comment below.
>
>> +
>> +	switch (config) {
>> +	case XE_PMU_RENDER_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +		type = __XE_SAMPLE_RENDER_GROUP_BUSY;
>> +		break;
>> +	case XE_PMU_COPY_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +		type = __XE_SAMPLE_COPY_GROUP_BUSY;
>> +		break;
>> +	case XE_PMU_MEDIA_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +		type = __XE_SAMPLE_MEDIA_GROUP_BUSY;
>> +		break;
>> +	case XE_PMU_ANY_ENGINE_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +		type = __XE_SAMPLE_ANY_ENGINE_GROUP_BUSY;
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return type;
>> +}
> I am thinking this function is not really needed. We can just do:
>
> 	int sample_type = config - 1;
>
> or
>
> 	int sample_type = config_counter(config) - 1;

It might not always be true in future, the configs can start from any range.

>
> in engine_group_busyness_read? See comment at __xe_pmu_event_read below.
>
>> +
>> +static void xe_pmu_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_device *xe =
>> +		container_of(event->pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu.base);
>> +
>> +	drm_WARN_ON(&xe->drm, event->parent);
>> +
>> +	drm_dev_put(&xe->drm);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u64 __engine_group_busyness_read(struct xe_gt *gt, int sample_type)
>> +{
>> +	u64 val = 0;
>> +
>> +	switch (sample_type) {
>> +	case __XE_SAMPLE_RENDER_GROUP_BUSY:
>> +		val = xe_mmio_read32(gt, XE_OAG_RENDER_BUSY_FREE);
>> +		break;
>> +	case __XE_SAMPLE_COPY_GROUP_BUSY:
>> +		val = xe_mmio_read32(gt, XE_OAG_BLT_BUSY_FREE);
>> +		break;
>> +	case __XE_SAMPLE_MEDIA_GROUP_BUSY:
>> +		val = xe_mmio_read32(gt, XE_OAG_ANY_MEDIA_FF_BUSY_FREE);
>> +		break;
>> +	case __XE_SAMPLE_ANY_ENGINE_GROUP_BUSY:
>> +		val = xe_mmio_read32(gt, XE_OAG_RC0_ANY_ENGINE_BUSY_FREE);
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		drm_warn(&gt->tile->xe->drm, "unknown pmu event\n");
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return xe_gt_clock_cycles_to_ns(gt, val * 16);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u64 engine_group_busyness_read(struct xe_gt *gt, u64 config)
>> +{
>> +	int sample_type = engine_busyness_sample_type(config);
> If config is event->attr.config, this can just be 'config_counter(config) - 1'.
> See comment at __xe_pmu_event_read below.
>
>> +	const unsigned int gt_id = gt->info.id;
>> +	struct xe_device *xe = gt->tile->xe;
>> +	struct xe_pmu *pmu = &xe->pmu;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	bool device_awake;
>> +	u64 val;
>> +
>> +	device_awake = xe_device_mem_access_get_if_ongoing(xe);
>> +	if (device_awake) {
>> +		XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT));
>> +		val = __engine_group_busyness_read(gt, sample_type);
>> +		XE_WARN_ON(xe_force_wake_put(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT));
>> +		xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	if (device_awake)
>> +		pmu->sample[gt_id][sample_type] = val;
>> +	else
>> +		val = pmu->sample[gt_id][sample_type];
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void engine_group_busyness_store(struct xe_gt *gt)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_pmu *pmu = &gt->tile->xe->pmu;
>> +	unsigned int gt_id = gt->info.id;
>> +	unsigned long flags;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock_irqsave(&pmu->lock, flags);
>> +
>> +	for (i = __XE_SAMPLE_RENDER_GROUP_BUSY; i <= __XE_SAMPLE_ANY_ENGINE_GROUP_BUSY; i++) {
>> +		pmu->sample[gt_id][i] = __engine_group_busyness_read(gt, i);
> This is not quite right. At the minimum we need to take forcewake
> here. Also since this is called in both suspend and runtime_suspend code
> paths we might also need to the take the runtime_pm reference.

The pm reference and forcewake are already taken in suspend paths hence didn't
add here again as this is called only from those paths.

check xe_gt_suspend.

>
> I think the simplest might be to just construct 'config'
> (event->attr.config) here and call engine_group_busyness_read? Something
> like:
>
> 	for (i = __XE_SAMPLE_RENDER_GROUP_BUSY; i <= __XE_SAMPLE_ANY_ENGINE_GROUP_BUSY; i++) {
> 		config = ; // Construct config using gt_id and i
> 		engine_group_busyness_read(gt, i);
> 	}
>
> This will automatically save the read values in pmu->sample[][] if the
> device is awake. Thoughts?

I think this is best kept separate from usual read paths(which are atomic) didn't want to club them.
Also because forcewakes and pm reference are taken separately in suspend path.

>
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pmu->lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +config_status(struct xe_device *xe, u64 config)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned int max_gt_id = xe->info.gt_count > 1 ? 1 : 0;
> What is this for? See below.

reminiscent of my previous code, will clean it up.

>
>> +	unsigned int gt_id = config_gt_id(config);
>> +	struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, gt_id);
>> +
>> +	if (gt_id > max_gt_id)
> Maybe this can just be:
>
> 	if (gt_id >= XE_PMU_MAX_GT)
>
>> +		return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> +	switch (config_counter(config)) {
>> +	case XE_PMU_INTERRUPTS(0):
>> +		if (gt_id)
>> +			return -ENOENT;
>> +		break;
>> +	case XE_PMU_RENDER_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +	case XE_PMU_COPY_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +	case XE_PMU_ANY_ENGINE_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +		if (gt->info.type == XE_GT_TYPE_MEDIA)
>> +			return -ENOENT;
>> +		break;
>> +	case XE_PMU_MEDIA_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +		if (!(gt->info.engine_mask & (BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VCS0) | BIT(XE_HW_ENGINE_VECS0))))
>> +			return -ENOENT;
>> +		break;
>> +	default:
>> +		return -ENOENT;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_device *xe =
>> +		container_of(event->pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu.base);
>> +	struct xe_pmu *pmu = &xe->pmu;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	if (pmu->closed)
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +	if (event->attr.type != event->pmu->type)
>> +		return -ENOENT;
>> +
>> +	/* unsupported modes and filters */
>> +	if (event->attr.sample_period) /* no sampling */
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if (has_branch_stack(event))
>> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> +
>> +	if (event->cpu < 0)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/* only allow running on one cpu at a time */
>> +	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(event->cpu, &xe_pmu_cpumask))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	ret = config_status(xe, event->attr.config);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		return ret;
>> +
>> +	if (!event->parent) {
>> +		drm_dev_get(&xe->drm);
>> +		event->destroy = xe_pmu_event_destroy;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u64 __xe_pmu_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_device *xe =
>> +		container_of(event->pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu.base);
>> +	const unsigned int gt_id = config_gt_id(event->attr.config);
>> +	const u64 config = config_counter(event->attr.config);
> Probably nit but this config being different from event->attr.config is
> confusing. Let's use 'event->attr.config' throughout as argument to
> functions and use config_counter() to get rid of gt_id. So get rid of this
> config variable.
>
>> +	struct xe_gt *gt = xe_device_get_gt(xe, gt_id);
>> +	struct xe_pmu *pmu = &xe->pmu;
>> +	u64 val = 0;
>> +
>> +	switch (config) {
> switch (config_counter(event->attr.config))
>
>> +	case XE_PMU_INTERRUPTS(0):
>> +		val = READ_ONCE(pmu->irq_count);
>> +		break;
>> +	case XE_PMU_RENDER_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +	case XE_PMU_COPY_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +	case XE_PMU_ANY_ENGINE_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +	case XE_PMU_MEDIA_GROUP_BUSY(0):
>> +		val = engine_group_busyness_read(gt, config);
> engine_group_busyness_read(gt, event->attr.config);

hmmm ok.

>
> Also, need a default case.
>
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return val;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void xe_pmu_event_read(struct perf_event *event)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_device *xe =
>> +		container_of(event->pmu, typeof(*xe), pmu.base);
>> +	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
>> +	struct xe_pmu *pmu = &xe->pmu;
>> +	u64 prev, new;
>> +
>> +	if (pmu->closed) {
>> +		event->hw.state = PERF_HES_STOPPED;
>> +		return;
>> +	}
>> +again:
>> +	prev = local64_read(&hwc->prev_count);
>> +	new = __xe_pmu_event_read(event);
>> +
>> +	if (local64_cmpxchg(&hwc->prev_count, prev, new) != prev)
>> +		goto again;
>> +
>> +	local64_add(new - prev, &event->count);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void xe_pmu_enable(struct perf_event *event)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Store the current counter value so we can report the correct delta
>> +	 * for all listeners. Even when the event was already enabled and has
>> +	 * an existing non-zero value.
>> +	 */
>> +	local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, __xe_pmu_event_read(event));
> Right now nothing is being enabled here (unlike i915) so the function name
> xe_pmu_enable looks weird. Not sure, maybe leave as is for when things get
> added in the future?
>
>> +static int xe_pmu_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_pmu *pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, typeof(*pmu), cpuhp.node);
>> +
>> +	BUG_ON(!pmu->base.event_init);
>> +
>> +	/* Select the first online CPU as a designated reader. */
>> +	if (cpumask_empty(&xe_pmu_cpumask))
>> +		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &xe_pmu_cpumask);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int xe_pmu_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu, struct hlist_node *node)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_pmu *pmu = hlist_entry_safe(node, typeof(*pmu), cpuhp.node);
>> +	unsigned int target = xe_pmu_target_cpu;
>> +
>> +	BUG_ON(!pmu->base.event_init);
> nit but wondering if we should remove these two BUG_ON's (and save a couple
> of checkpatch warnings even though the BUG_ON's are in i915) and just do
> something like:
>
> 	  if (!pmu->base.event_init)
> 		return 0;
>
> The reason for the BUG_ON's seems to be that these functions can be called
> after module_init but before probe.
>
> xe_pmu_cpu_online() doesn't depend on pmu at all so looks like the BUG_ON
> can just be dropped?

the  xe_pmu_cpu_online/offline are not invoked when they are registered with
cpuhp_setup_state_multi, but rather when cpuhp_state_add_instance() is called
which is done post the PMU is initialized hence the check for BUG_ON.

Thanks,
Aravind.

>
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-xe/attachments/20230831/ad835446/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list