[Intel-xe] [PATCH 4/5] rm/xe: Allow num_batch_buffer == 0 in exec IOCTL
Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Mon Dec 4 13:25:55 UTC 2023
On 11/16/23 20:40, Matthew Brost wrote:
> The idea being out-syncs can signal indicating all previous operations
> on the exec queue are complete. An example use case of this would be
> support for implementing vkQueueWaitForIdle easily.
>
> v2: Don't add last_fence for VM's that do not support dma fences
> v3: Use a flags field instead of severval bools in sync parse (Thomas)
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h | 5 +++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h | 6 +++++-
> 5 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> index 7d4d22c81a42..4989bc6038af 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,8 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, q->width != args->num_batch_buffer))
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, args->num_batch_buffer &&
> + q->width != args->num_batch_buffer))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_BANNED)) {
> @@ -183,12 +184,14 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> err = xe_sync_entry_parse(xe, xef, &syncs[num_syncs++],
> &syncs_user[i], SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_EXEC |
> (xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm) ?
> - SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE : 0));
> + SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE : 0) |
> + (!args->num_batch_buffer ?
> + SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_DISALLOW_USER_FENCE : 0));
Q: Why do we disallow user fences in this situation?
> if (err)
> goto err_syncs;
> }
>
> - if (xe_exec_queue_is_parallel(q)) {
> + if (args->num_batch_buffer && xe_exec_queue_is_parallel(q)) {
> err = __copy_from_user(addresses, addresses_user, sizeof(u64) *
> q->width);
> if (err) {
> @@ -235,6 +238,18 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> goto err_exec;
> }
>
> + if (!args->num_batch_buffer) {
> + if (!xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm)) {
> + struct dma_fence *fence =
> + xe_exec_queue_last_fence_get(q, vm);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < num_syncs; i++)
> + xe_sync_entry_signal(&syncs[i], NULL, fence);
> + }
> +
> + goto err_exec;
> + }
> +
> if (xe_exec_queue_is_lr(q) && xe_exec_queue_ring_full(q)) {
> err = -EWOULDBLOCK;
> goto err_exec;
> @@ -328,6 +343,8 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
>
> if (xe_exec_queue_is_lr(q))
> q->ring_ops->emit_job(job);
> + if (!xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm))
> + xe_exec_queue_last_fence_set(q, vm, &job->drm.s_fence->finished);
> xe_sched_job_push(job);
> xe_vm_reactivate_rebind(vm);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> index 4fd44a9203e4..35710b66e5de 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue.c
> @@ -924,7 +924,10 @@ int xe_exec_queue_set_property_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> static void xe_exec_queue_last_fence_lockdep_assert(struct xe_exec_queue *q,
> struct xe_vm *vm)
> {
> - lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);
> + if (q->flags & EXEC_QUEUE_FLAG_VM)
> + lockdep_assert_held_write(&vm->lock);
> + else
> + xe_vm_assert_held(vm);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> index 5ba47a5cfdbd..52f0927d0d9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec_queue_types.h
> @@ -56,8 +56,9 @@ struct xe_exec_queue {
> struct xe_hw_fence_irq *fence_irq;
>
> /**
> - * @last_fence: last fence on engine, protected by vm->lock in write
> - * mode if bind engine
> + * @last_fence: last fence on exec queue, protected by vm->lock in write
> + * mode if bind exec queue, protected by dma resv lock if non-bind exec
> + * queue
> */
> struct dma_fence *last_fence;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> index 016d0a2ea5bc..cfe8724ee954 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,7 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> int err;
> bool exec = flags & SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_EXEC;
> bool lr_mode = flags & SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE;
> + bool disallow_user_fence = flags & SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_DISALLOW_USER_FENCE;
> bool signal;
>
> if (copy_from_user(&sync_in, sync_user, sizeof(*sync_user)))
> @@ -173,6 +174,9 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> break;
>
> case DRM_XE_SYNC_USER_FENCE:
> + if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, disallow_user_fence))
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(xe, !signal))
> return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h
> index 30958ddc4cdc..45f4371e94b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.h
> @@ -12,10 +12,14 @@ struct xe_device;
> struct xe_file;
> struct xe_sched_job;
>
> +#define SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_EXEC BIT(0)
> +#define SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_LR_MODE BIT(1)
> +#define SYNC_PARSE_FLAG_DISALLOW_USER_FENCE BIT(2)
> +
> int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> struct xe_sync_entry *sync,
> struct drm_xe_sync __user *sync_user,
> - bool exec, bool compute_mode);
> + unsigned int flags);
Should this have been in the previous patch?
Thomas
> int xe_sync_entry_wait(struct xe_sync_entry *sync);
> int xe_sync_entry_add_deps(struct xe_sync_entry *sync,
> struct xe_sched_job *job);
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list