[Intel-xe] [CI 02/16] drm/gpuvm: don't always WARN in drm_gpuvm_check_overflow()
Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Tue Dec 5 15:18:58 UTC 2023
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com>
Don't always WARN in drm_gpuvm_check_overflow() and separate it into a
drm_gpuvm_check_overflow() and a dedicated
drm_gpuvm_warn_check_overflow() variant.
This avoids printing warnings due to invalid userspace requests.
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon at collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Danilo Krummrich <dakr at redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231108001259.15123-3-dakr@redhat.com
(cherry picked from commit d1adea27d0c8a08031b075f1bf4c5ce6f135ad7c)
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
index b378554b81ac..1cbeb4169f9c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gpuvm.c
@@ -614,12 +614,18 @@ static int __drm_gpuva_insert(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
static void __drm_gpuva_remove(struct drm_gpuva *va);
static bool
-drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range)
+drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(u64 addr, u64 range)
{
u64 end;
- return drm_WARN(gpuvm->drm, check_add_overflow(addr, range, &end),
- "GPUVA address limited to %zu bytes.\n", sizeof(end));
+ return check_add_overflow(addr, range, &end);
+}
+
+static bool
+drm_gpuvm_warn_check_overflow(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, u64 addr, u64 range)
+{
+ return drm_WARN(gpuvm->drm, drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(addr, range),
+ "GPUVA address limited to %zu bytes.\n", sizeof(addr));
}
static bool
@@ -647,7 +653,7 @@ static bool
drm_gpuvm_range_valid(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm,
u64 addr, u64 range)
{
- return !drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(gpuvm, addr, range) &&
+ return !drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(addr, range) &&
drm_gpuvm_in_mm_range(gpuvm, addr, range) &&
!drm_gpuvm_in_kernel_node(gpuvm, addr, range);
}
@@ -682,7 +688,7 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
gpuvm->ops = ops;
gpuvm->drm = drm;
- drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(gpuvm, start_offset, range);
+ drm_gpuvm_warn_check_overflow(gpuvm, start_offset, range);
gpuvm->mm_start = start_offset;
gpuvm->mm_range = range;
@@ -691,8 +697,8 @@ drm_gpuvm_init(struct drm_gpuvm *gpuvm, const char *name,
gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node.va.addr = reserve_offset;
gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node.va.range = reserve_range;
- if (likely(!drm_gpuvm_check_overflow(gpuvm, reserve_offset,
- reserve_range)))
+ if (likely(!drm_gpuvm_warn_check_overflow(gpuvm, reserve_offset,
+ reserve_range)))
__drm_gpuva_insert(gpuvm, &gpuvm->kernel_alloc_node);
}
}
--
2.42.0
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list