[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Fix lockdep warning in xe_force_wake calls

[Aravind Iddamsetty]

Use spin_lock_irqsave, spin_unlock_irqrestore

Fix for below:
[13994.811263] ========================================================
[13994.811295] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
[13994.811326] 6.6.0-rc3-xe #2 Tainted: G     U
[13994.811358] --------------------------------------------------------
[13994.811388] swapper/0/0 just changed the state of lock:
[13994.811416] ffff895c7e044db8 (&cpuctx_lock){-...}-{2:2}, at:
__perf_event_read+0xb7/0x3a0
[13994.811494] but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-unsafe lock in the
past:
[13994.811528]  (&fw->lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
[13994.811544]

               and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between
them.

[13994.811606]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[13994.811636]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

[13994.811667]        CPU0                    CPU1
[13994.811691]        ----                    ----
[13994.811715]   lock(&fw->lock);
[13994.811744]                                local_irq_disable();
[13994.811773]                                lock(&cpuctx_lock);
[13994.811810]                                lock(&fw->lock);
[13994.811846]   <Interrupt>
[13994.811865]     lock(&cpuctx_lock);
[13994.811895]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

v2: Use spin_lock in atomic context and spin_lock_irq in a non atomic
context (Matthew Brost)

v3: just use spin_lock_irqsave/restore

Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>

Signed-off-by: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty at linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
index 32d6c4dd2807..9bbe8a5040da 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_force_wake.c
@@ -145,9 +145,10 @@ int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
 	struct xe_gt *gt = fw_to_gt(fw);
 	struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
 	enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, woken = 0;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret, ret2 = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&fw->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
 	for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
 		if (!domain->ref++) {
 			woken |= BIT(domain->id);
@@ -162,7 +163,7 @@ int xe_force_wake_get(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
 				   domain->id, ret);
 	}
 	fw->awake_domains |= woken;
-	spin_unlock(&fw->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
 
 	return ret2;
 }
@@ -174,9 +175,10 @@ int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
 	struct xe_gt *gt = fw_to_gt(fw);
 	struct xe_force_wake_domain *domain;
 	enum xe_force_wake_domains tmp, sleep = 0;
+	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret, ret2 = 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&fw->lock);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&fw->lock, flags);
 	for_each_fw_domain_masked(domain, domains, fw, tmp) {
 		if (!--domain->ref) {
 			sleep |= BIT(domain->id);
@@ -191,7 +193,7 @@ int xe_force_wake_put(struct xe_force_wake *fw,
 				   domain->id, ret);
 	}
 	fw->awake_domains &= ~sleep;
-	spin_unlock(&fw->lock);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fw->lock, flags);
 
 	return ret2;
 }
-- 
2.25.1