[Intel-xe] [v2 1/2] drm/xe: Add a new memory directory under tile

Upadhyay, Tejas tejas.upadhyay at intel.com
Thu Dec 7 05:12:42 UTC 2023



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> Sundaresan, Sujaritha
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 5:44 PM
> To: Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>; intel-
> xe at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Vivi, Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-xe] [v2 1/2] drm/xe: Add a new memory directory under
> tile
> 
> 
> On 12/6/2023 5:38 PM, Sundaresan, Sujaritha wrote:
> >
> > On 12/6/2023 5:23 PM, Gupta, Anshuman wrote:
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Intel-xe <intel-xe-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> >>> Sujaritha Sundaresan
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 10:18 AM
> >>> To: intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
> >>> Cc: Sundaresan, Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>; Vivi,
> >>> Rodrigo <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> >>> Subject: [Intel-xe] [v2 1/2] drm/xe: Add a new memory directory
> >>> under tile
> >>>
> >>> Add a new memory directory under /device/tile<n> and move
> >>> physical_vram_size attribute to the new directory.
> >>>
> >>> New hierarchy:
> >>>
> >>> /device/tile<n>/memory/physical_vram_size_bytes
> >>>
> >>> v2: Fix heading typo (Riana)
> >>>      Fix cleanup error on unload/reload cycle
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >>>   1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
> >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
> >>> index 16376607c68f..e8ce4d9270e6 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
> >>> @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ static ssize_t
> >>>   physical_vram_size_bytes_show(struct device *kdev, struct
> >>> device_attribute *attr,
> >>>                     char *buf)
> >>>   {
> >>> -    struct xe_tile *tile = kobj_to_tile(&kdev->kobj);
> >>> +    struct kobject *kobj = &kdev->kobj;
> >>> +    struct xe_tile *tile = kobj_to_tile(kobj->parent);
> >>>
> >>>       return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n",
> >>> tile->mem.vram.actual_physical_size);
> >>>   }
> >>> @@ -38,7 +39,7 @@ static void tile_sysfs_fini(struct drm_device
> >>> *drm, void
> >>> *arg)  {
> >>>       struct xe_tile *tile = arg;
> >>>
> >>> -    kobject_put(tile->sysfs);
> >>> +    kobject_del(tile->sysfs);
> >> Why kobekct_del instead of kobject_put?
> >> Thanks,
> >> Anshuman Gupta.
> >
> > Hi Anshuman,
> >
> > Basically when sanity checking, after reload we see that we are not
> > doing a proper cleanup.
> >
> > kobject_put will only decrement the ref count and possibly free the
> > kobject.
> >
> > But that is not happening in this case. There is a duplicate remaining
> > of the tile directory.
> >
> > This required a clean unregister of the parent from sysfs hence the
> > use of kobject_del.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Suja
> 
> As a continuation of the above response;
> 
> I can probably add a kobject_put call as well to ensure that we are cleaning
> up the memory side of
> 
> things as well. Will add.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Suja
> 
> >
> >>>   }
> >>>
> >>>   void xe_tile_sysfs_init(struct xe_tile *tile) @@ -46,6 +47,7 @@
> >>> void xe_tile_sysfs_init(struct xe_tile *tile)
> >>>       struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
> >>>       struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
> >>>       struct kobj_tile *kt;
> >>> +    struct kobject *kobj;
> >>>       int err;
> >>>
> >>>       kt = kzalloc(sizeof(*kt), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -64,8 +66,15 @@ void
> >>> xe_tile_sysfs_init(struct xe_tile *tile)
> >>>
> >>>       tile->sysfs = &kt->base;
> >>>
> >>> +    kobj = kobject_create_and_add("memory", tile->sysfs);
> >>> +    if (!kobj) {
> >>> +        kobject_put(kobj);

Do you mean to put kobject_put(tile->sysfs) instead of kobject_put(kobj) ? as there was no Kobj created by the time you reached here!

Tejas

> >>> +        drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s failed, err: %d\n", __func__, -
> >>> ENOMEM);
> >>> +        return;
> >>> +    }
> >>> +
> >>>       if (IS_DGFX(xe) && xe->info.platform != XE_DG1 &&
> >>> -        sysfs_create_file(tile->sysfs, physical_memsize_attr))
> >>> +        sysfs_create_file(kobj, physical_memsize_attr))
> >>>           drm_warn(&xe->drm,
> >>>                "Sysfs creation to read addr_range per tile
> >>> failed\n");
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> 2.25.1


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list