[Intel-xe] [v2 2/2] drm/xe: Add vram frequency sysfs attributes
Sundaresan, Sujaritha
sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com
Thu Dec 7 06:45:00 UTC 2023
On 12/7/2023 11:32 AM, Riana Tauro wrote:
> Hi Suja
>
> On 12/6/2023 10:17 AM, Sujaritha Sundaresan wrote:
>> Add vram frequency sysfs attributes under the below hierarchy;
>>
>> /device/tile<n>/memory/freq
>> |-rp0_freq
>> |-rpn_freq
>>
>> v2: Drop "vram" from attribute names (Rodrigo)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h | 8 ++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
>> index 5935cfe30204..edde5335bdb1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pcode_api.h
>> @@ -42,6 +42,14 @@
>> #define POWER_SETUP_I1_SHIFT 6 /* 10.6 fixed point
>> format */
>> #define POWER_SETUP_I1_DATA_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 0)
>> +#define XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG 0x6e /* xehp, pvc */
> Can we change it to PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG ? there's no usage of
> prefix in other places
Sure couldn't hurt to generalize it I guess.
>> +/* XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG sub-commands (param1) */
>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_P0 0x0
>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_PN 0x1
>> +/* PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_* - mailbox domain IDs */
>> +/* XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG param2 */
>> +#define PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_HBM 0x2
>> +
>> struct pcode_err_decode {
>> int errno;
>> const char *str;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
>> index e8ce4d9270e6..38d334833594 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
>> @@ -7,9 +7,14 @@
>> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>> #include <drm/drm_managed.h>
>> +#include "xe_gt_types.h"
>> +#include "xe_pcode.h"
>> +#include "xe_pcode_api.h"
>> #include "xe_tile.h"
>> #include "xe_tile_sysfs.h"
>> +#define GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER 50
> Could you add documentation to this file as there are multiple sysfs
> added.
>
Sure will add.
>> +
>> static void xe_tile_sysfs_kobj_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>> {
>> kfree(kobj);
>> @@ -35,6 +40,65 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(physical_vram_size_bytes);
>> static const struct attribute *physical_memsize_attr =
>> &dev_attr_physical_vram_size_bytes.attr;
>> +static ssize_t rp0_freq_show(struct device *kdev, struct
>> device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> +{
>> + struct kobject *kobj = &kdev->kobj;
>> + struct xe_tile *tile = kobj_to_tile(kobj->parent);
>> + struct xe_gt *gt = tile->primary_gt;
>> + u32 val, mbox;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + mbox = REG_FIELD_PREP(PCODE_MB_COMMAND,
>> XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG)
>> + | REG_FIELD_PREP(PCODE_MB_PARAM1,
>> PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_P0)
>> + | REG_FIELD_PREP(PCODE_MB_PARAM2, PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_HBM);
>> +
>> + err = xe_pcode_read(gt, mbox, &val, NULL);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + /* data_out - Fused P0 for domain ID in units of 50 MHz */
>> + val *= GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>> +
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", val);
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rp0_freq);
>> +
>> +static ssize_t rpn_freq_show(struct device *kdev, struct
>> device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
> alignment to the start of bracket
>
> Thanks
> Riana Tauro
Yeah I had already responded about this on one of the reviews from Anshuman.
Will fix.
Thanks,
Suja
>> +{
>> + struct kobject *kobj = &kdev->kobj;
>> + struct xe_tile *tile = kobj_to_tile(kobj->parent);
>> + struct xe_gt *gt = tile->primary_gt;
>> + u32 val, mbox;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + mbox = REG_FIELD_PREP(PCODE_MB_COMMAND,
>> XEHP_PCODE_FREQUENCY_CONFIG)
>> + | REG_FIELD_PREP(PCODE_MB_PARAM1,
>> PCODE_MBOX_FC_SC_READ_FUSED_PN)
>> + | REG_FIELD_PREP(PCODE_MB_PARAM2, PCODE_MBOX_DOMAIN_HBM);
>> +
>> + err = xe_pcode_read(gt, mbox, &val, NULL);
>> + if (err)
>> + return err;
>> +
>> + /* data_out - Fused Pn for domain ID in units of 50 MHz */
>> + val *= GT_FREQUENCY_MULTIPLIER;
>> +
>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", val);
>> +}
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(rpn_freq);
>> +
>> +static struct attribute *freq_attrs[] = {
>> + &dev_attr_rp0_freq.attr,
>> + &dev_attr_rpn_freq.attr,
>> + NULL
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct attribute_group freq_group_attrs = {
>> + .name = "freq",
>> + .attrs = freq_attrs,
>> +};
>> +
>> static void tile_sysfs_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
>> {
>> struct xe_tile *tile = arg;
>> @@ -78,6 +142,14 @@ void xe_tile_sysfs_init(struct xe_tile *tile)
>> drm_warn(&xe->drm,
>> "Sysfs creation to read addr_range per tile failed\n");
>> + if (xe->info.platform == XE_PVC) {
>> + err = sysfs_create_group(kobj, &freq_group_attrs);
>> + if (err) {
>> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "failed to register vram freq sysfs,
>> err: %d\n", err);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, tile_sysfs_fini, tile);
>> if (err) {
>> drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s: drmm_add_action_or_reset failed,
>> err: %d\n",
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list