[v3 1/2] drm/xe: Add a new memory directory under tile
Sundaresan, Sujaritha
sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com
Mon Dec 11 10:14:38 UTC 2023
On 12/11/2023 3:23 PM, Riana Tauro wrote:
> Hi Suja
>
> On 12/8/2023 1:58 PM, Sundaresan, Sujaritha wrote:
>>
>> On 12/8/2023 10:33 AM, Upadhyay, Tejas wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Sundaresan, Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Thursday, December 7, 2023 8:48 PM
>>>> To: intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
>>>> Cc: Upadhyay, Tejas <tejas.upadhyay at intel.com>; Tauro, Riana
>>>> <riana.tauro at intel.com>; Gupta, Anshuman <anshuman.gupta at intel.com>;
>>>> Sundaresan, Sujaritha <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
>>>> Subject: [v3 1/2] drm/xe: Add a new memory directory under tile
>>>>
>>>> Add a new memory directory under /device/tile<n> and move
>>>> physical_vram_size attribute to the new directory.
>>>>
>>>> New hierarchy:
>>>>
>>>> /device/tile<n>/memory/physical_vram_size_bytes
>>>>
>>>> v2: Fix heading typo (Riana)
>>>> Fix cleanup error on unload/reload cycle
>>>>
>>>> v3: Fix reload error with kobject_put in place
>>>> of kobject_del (Tejas)
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan at intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
>>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
>>>> index 16376607c68f..64be1f3a38a9 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_tile_sysfs.c
>>>> @@ -24,7 +24,8 @@ static ssize_t
>>>> physical_vram_size_bytes_show(struct device *kdev, struct
>>>> device_attribute
>>>> *attr,
>>>> char *buf)
>>>> {
>>>> - struct xe_tile *tile = kobj_to_tile(&kdev->kobj);
>>>> + struct kobject *kobj = &kdev->kobj;
>>>> + struct xe_tile *tile = kobj_to_tile(kobj->parent);
>>> As Christmas is approaching, you might want to adjust this in
>>> Christmas tree order.
>>>
>>>> return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n",
>>>> tile->mem.vram.actual_physical_size);
>>>> }
>>>> @@ -36,8 +37,10 @@ static const struct attribute
>>>> *physical_memsize_attr =
>>>>
>>>> static void tile_sysfs_fini(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg) {
>>>> - struct xe_tile *tile = arg;
>>>> + struct kobject *kobj = arg;
>>>> + struct xe_tile *tile = kobj_to_tile(kobj->parent);
>>> Ditto
>>>
>>>> + kobject_put(kobj);
>>>> kobject_put(tile->sysfs);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> @@ -46,6 +49,7 @@ void xe_tile_sysfs_init(struct xe_tile *tile)
>>>> struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
>>>> struct device *dev = xe->drm.dev;
>>>> struct kobj_tile *kt;
>>>> + struct kobject *kobj;
>>>> int err;
>>>>
>>>> kt = kzalloc(sizeof(*kt), GFP_KERNEL); @@ -64,12 +68,17 @@ void
>>>> xe_tile_sysfs_init(struct xe_tile *tile)
>>>>
>>>> tile->sysfs = &kt->base;
>>>>
>>>> - if (IS_DGFX(xe) && xe->info.platform != XE_DG1 &&
>>>> - sysfs_create_file(tile->sysfs, physical_memsize_attr))
>>>> + kobj = kobject_create_and_add("memory", tile->sysfs);
>>>> + if (!kobj) {
>>>> + drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s failed, err: %d\n", __func__, -
>>>> ENOMEM);
>>>> + }
>
> There will be an empty memory directory in case of igfx. Should the
> memory directory be created only if there are attributes available?
>
> Thanks
> Riana
I can have it added only if IS_DGFX if that works.
Thanks,
Suja
>>> { } is not required here.
>>>
>>> Tejas
>>
>> Will fix all of the above.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Suja
>>
>>>> +
>>>> + if (kobj && IS_DGFX(xe) && xe->info.platform != XE_DG1 &&
>>>> + sysfs_create_file(kobj, physical_memsize_attr))
>>>> drm_warn(&xe->drm,
>>>> "Sysfs creation to read addr_range per tile failed\n");
>>>>
>>>> - err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, tile_sysfs_fini, tile);
>>>> + err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, tile_sysfs_fini, kobj);
>>>> if (err) {
>>>> drm_warn(&xe->drm, "%s: drmm_add_action_or_reset
>>>> failed, err: %d\n",
>>>> __func__, err);
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list