[PATCH 10/10] drm/xe/vf: Add VF specific interrupt handler

Michal Wajdeczko michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Thu Dec 14 00:20:48 UTC 2023



On 13.12.2023 01:57, Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:00:54PM +0100, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
>> There are small differences in handling of the register based
>> interrupts on the VF driver as some registers are not accessible
>> to the VF driver. Additionally VFs must support Memory Based
>> Interrupts. Add VF specific interrupt handler for this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
>> index d1f5ba4bb745..907c8ff0fa21 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
>> @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
>>  #include "xe_gt.h"
>>  #include "xe_guc.h"
>>  #include "xe_hw_engine.h"
>> +#include "xe_memirq.h"
>>  #include "xe_mmio.h"
>> +#include "xe_sriov.h"
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Interrupt registers for a unit are always consecutive and ordered
>> @@ -498,6 +500,9 @@ static void xelp_irq_reset(struct xe_tile *tile)
>>  
>>  	gt_irq_reset(tile);
>>  
>> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(tile_to_xe(tile)))
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	mask_and_disable(tile, PCU_IRQ_OFFSET);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -508,6 +513,9 @@ static void dg1_irq_reset(struct xe_tile *tile)
>>  
>>  	gt_irq_reset(tile);
>>  
>> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(tile_to_xe(tile)))
>> +		return;
>> +
>>  	mask_and_disable(tile, PCU_IRQ_OFFSET);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -518,11 +526,34 @@ static void dg1_irq_reset_mstr(struct xe_tile *tile)
>>  	xe_mmio_write32(mmio, GFX_MSTR_IRQ, ~0);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void vf_irq_reset(struct xe_device *xe)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_tile *tile;
>> +	unsigned int id;
>> +
>> +	xe_assert(xe, IS_SRIOV_VF(xe));
>> +
>> +	if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) < 1210)
>> +		xelp_intr_disable(xe);
>> +	else
>> +		xe_assert(xe, xe_device_has_memirq(xe));
> 
> Isn't this going to fail on DG1 (version 12.10)?  I don't believe it has
> memirq does it?

there is no SRIOV on DG1, so we won't be using this function there

> 
> Of course I don't know how much effort we want to put into these older
> platforms that are just temporary development vehicles and will never be
> "officially" supported by the Xe driver.  If we never enable SRIOV on
> those, then it doesn't really matter.
> 
> 
> Matt
> 
>> +
>> +	for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>> +		if (xe_device_has_memirq(xe))
>> +			xe_memirq_reset(&tile->sriov.vf.memirq);
>> +		else
>> +			gt_irq_reset(tile);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void xe_irq_reset(struct xe_device *xe)
>>  {
>>  	struct xe_tile *tile;
>>  	u8 id;
>>  
>> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
>> +		return vf_irq_reset(xe);
>> +
>>  	for_each_tile(tile, xe, id) {
>>  		if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210)
>>  			dg1_irq_reset(tile);
>> @@ -545,8 +576,26 @@ static void xe_irq_reset(struct xe_device *xe)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void vf_irq_postinstall(struct xe_device *xe)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_tile *tile;
>> +	unsigned int id;
>> +
>> +	for_each_tile(tile, xe, id)
>> +		if (xe_device_has_memirq(xe))
>> +			xe_memirq_postinstall(&tile->sriov.vf.memirq);
>> +
>> +	if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) < 1210)
>> +		xelp_intr_enable(xe, true);
>> +	else
>> +		xe_assert(xe, xe_device_has_memirq(xe));
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void xe_irq_postinstall(struct xe_device *xe)
>>  {
>> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe))
>> +		return vf_irq_postinstall(xe);
>> +
>>  	xe_display_irq_postinstall(xe, xe_root_mmio_gt(xe));
>>  
>>  	/*
>> @@ -563,8 +612,30 @@ static void xe_irq_postinstall(struct xe_device *xe)
>>  		xelp_intr_enable(xe, true);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static irqreturn_t vf_mem_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>> +{
>> +	struct xe_device *xe = arg;
>> +	struct xe_tile *tile;
>> +	unsigned int id;
>> +
>> +	spin_lock(&xe->irq.lock);
>> +	if (!xe->irq.enabled) {
>> +		spin_unlock(&xe->irq.lock);
>> +		return IRQ_NONE;
>> +	}
>> +	spin_unlock(&xe->irq.lock);
>> +
>> +	for_each_tile(tile, xe, id)
>> +		xe_memirq_handler(&tile->sriov.vf.memirq);
>> +
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static irq_handler_t xe_irq_handler(struct xe_device *xe)
>>  {
>> +	if (IS_SRIOV_VF(xe) && xe_device_has_memirq(xe))
>> +		return vf_mem_irq_handler;
>> +
>>  	if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210)
>>  		return dg1_irq_handler;
>>  	else
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1
>>
> 


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list