[PATCH] drm/xe: Fix UBSAN splat in add_preempt_fences()
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Fri Dec 15 21:30:01 UTC 2023
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 01:12:45PM -0800, Matthew Brost wrote:
> add_preempt_fences() calls dma_resv_reserve_fences() with num_fences ==
> 0 resulting in the below UBSAN splat. Short circuit add_preempt_fences()
> if num_fences == 0.
>
> [ 58.652241] ================================================================================
> [ 58.660736] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ./include/linux/log2.h:57:13
> [ 58.667281] shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
> [ 58.674539] CPU: 2 PID: 1170 Comm: xe_gpgpu_fill Not tainted 6.6.0-rc3-guc+ #630
> [ 58.674545] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Tiger Lake Client Platform/TigerLake U DDR4 SODIMM RVP, BIOS TGLSFWI1.R00.3243.A01.2006102133 06/10/2020
> [ 58.674547] Call Trace:
> [ 58.674548] <TASK>
> [ 58.674550] dump_stack_lvl+0x92/0xb0
> [ 58.674555] __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x15a/0x300
> [ 58.674559] ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0x60
> [ 58.674564] ? software_resume+0x141/0x210
> [ 58.674575] ? new_vma+0x44b/0x600 [xe]
> [ 58.674606] dma_resv_reserve_fences.cold+0x40/0x66
> [ 58.674612] new_vma+0x4b3/0x600 [xe]
> [ 58.674638] xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0xffd/0x1e00 [xe]
> [ 58.674663] ? __pfx_xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe]
> [ 58.674680] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc1/0x170
> [ 58.674686] ? __pfx_xe_vm_bind_ioctl+0x10/0x10 [xe]
> [ 58.674703] drm_ioctl+0x247/0x4c0
> [ 58.674709] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
> [ 58.674716] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8c/0xb0
> [ 58.674720] do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90
> [ 58.674723] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
> [ 58.674727] RIP: 0033:0x7fce4bd1aaff
> [ 58.674730] Code: 00 48 89 44 24 18 31 c0 48 8d 44 24 60 c7 04 24 10 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 08 48 8d 44 24 20 48 89 44 24 10 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <41> 89 c0 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 1f 48 8b 44 24 18 64 48 2b 04 25 28 00
> [ 58.674731] RSP: 002b:00007ffc57434050 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
> [ 58.674734] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc574340e0 RCX: 00007fce4bd1aaff
> [ 58.674736] RDX: 00007ffc574340e0 RSI: 0000000040886445 RDI: 0000000000000003
> [ 58.674737] RBP: 0000000040886445 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 00007ffc574341b0
> [ 58.674739] R10: 000055de43eb3780 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007ffc574340e0
> [ 58.674740] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 00007ffc574341b0 R15: 0000000000000001
> [ 58.674747] </TASK>
> [ 58.674748] ================================================================================
Can we pin-point which commit introduced this?
we need to start using more the 'Fixes:' tags.
(Although while we are really not in tree we still have a chance of rebasing and having to adjust
the tags once again)
>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index 322c1eccecca..6406370b2625 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -283,6 +283,9 @@ static int add_preempt_fences(struct xe_vm *vm, struct xe_bo *bo)
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + if (!vm->preempt.num_exec_queues)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> err = dma_resv_reserve_fences(bo->ttm.base.resv, vm->preempt.num_exec_queues);
> if (err)
> goto out_unlock;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list