[Intel-xe] [PATCH v4 2/7] drm/xe/ct: hold fast_lock when reserving space for g2h
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Thu Jul 6 03:43:39 UTC 2023
On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 05:06:05PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Reserving and checking for space on the g2h side relies on the
> fast_lock, and not the CT lock since we need to release space from the
> fast CT path. Make sure we hold it when checking for space and reserving
> it. The main concern is calling __g2h_release_space() as we are reserving
> something and since the info.space and info.g2h_outstanding operations
> are not atomic we can get some nonsense values back.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index b7aecc480098..f8c1a2ca89f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -346,7 +346,10 @@ static bool h2g_has_room(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 cmd_len)
>
> static bool g2h_has_room(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len)
> {
> - lockdep_assert_held(&ct->lock);
> + if (!g2h_len)
> + return true;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ct->fast_lock);
>
> return ct->ctbs.g2h.info.space > g2h_len;
> }
> @@ -367,15 +370,15 @@ static void h2g_reserve_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 cmd_len)
> ct->ctbs.h2g.info.space -= cmd_len;
> }
>
> -static void g2h_reserve_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len, u32 num_g2h)
> +static void __g2h_reserve_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len, u32 num_g2h)
> {
> XE_BUG_ON(g2h_len > ct->ctbs.g2h.info.space);
>
> if (g2h_len) {
> - spin_lock_irq(&ct->fast_lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&ct->fast_lock);
> +
> ct->ctbs.g2h.info.space -= g2h_len;
> ct->g2h_outstanding += num_g2h;
> - spin_unlock_irq(&ct->fast_lock);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -499,21 +502,26 @@ static int __guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action,
> }
> }
>
> + if (g2h_len)
> + spin_lock_irq(&ct->fast_lock);
> retry:
> ret = has_room(ct, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN, g2h_len);
> if (unlikely(ret))
> - goto out;
> + goto out_unlock;
>
> ret = h2g_write(ct, action, len, g2h_fence ? g2h_fence->seqno : 0,
> !!g2h_fence);
> if (unlikely(ret)) {
> if (ret == -EAGAIN)
> goto retry;
> - goto out;
> + goto out_unlock;
> }
>
> - g2h_reserve_space(ct, g2h_len, num_g2h);
> + __g2h_reserve_space(ct, g2h_len, num_g2h);
> xe_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct));
> +out_unlock:
> + if (g2h_len)
> + spin_unlock_irq(&ct->fast_lock);
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.41.0
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list