[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: Use atomic instead of mutex for xe_device_mem_access_ongoing

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Wed Mar 1 16:36:29 UTC 2023


On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 11:17:30AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>xe_guc_ct_fast_path() is called from an irq context, and cannot lock
>the mutex used by xe_device_mem_access_ongoing().
>
>Fortunately it is easy to fix, and the atomic guarantees are good enough
>to ensure xe->mem_access.hold_rpm is set before last ref is dropped.
>
>As far as I can tell, the runtime ref in device access should be
>killable, but don't dare to do it yet.

I don't follow this last paragraph. Could you point it in the code?

>
>Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c       | 17 ++++++++---------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h       | 14 ++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h |  4 +---
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>index 4eb6786b11f0..ab179b1e24c1 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
>@@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ struct xe_device *xe_device_create(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> 	if (err)
> 		goto err;
>
>-	mutex_init(&xe->mem_access.lock);
> 	return xe;
>
> err_put:
>@@ -424,25 +423,25 @@ u32 xe_device_ccs_bytes(struct xe_device *xe, u64 size)
> void xe_device_mem_access_get(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> 	bool resumed = xe_pm_runtime_resume_if_suspended(xe);
>+	int ref = atomic_inc_return(&xe->mem_access.ref);


+Matt Brost

Any reason for not using kref?

Lucas De Marchi

>
>-	mutex_lock(&xe->mem_access.lock);
>-	if (xe->mem_access.ref++ == 0)
>+	if (ref == 1)
> 		xe->mem_access.hold_rpm = xe_pm_runtime_get_if_active(xe);
>-	mutex_unlock(&xe->mem_access.lock);
>
> 	/* The usage counter increased if device was immediately resumed */
> 	if (resumed)
> 		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>
>-	XE_WARN_ON(xe->mem_access.ref == S32_MAX);
>+	XE_WARN_ON(ref == S32_MAX);
> }
>
> void xe_device_mem_access_put(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
>-	mutex_lock(&xe->mem_access.lock);
>-	if (--xe->mem_access.ref == 0 && xe->mem_access.hold_rpm)
>+	bool hold = xe->mem_access.hold_rpm;
>+	int ref = atomic_dec_return(&xe->mem_access.ref);
>+
>+	if (!ref && hold)
> 		xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
>-	mutex_unlock(&xe->mem_access.lock);
>
>-	XE_WARN_ON(xe->mem_access.ref < 0);
>+	XE_WARN_ON(ref < 0);
> }
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>index 263620953c3b..96b4f3d7969e 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.h
>@@ -90,20 +90,14 @@ static inline struct xe_force_wake * gt_to_fw(struct xe_gt *gt)
> void xe_device_mem_access_get(struct xe_device *xe);
> void xe_device_mem_access_put(struct xe_device *xe);
>
>-static inline void xe_device_assert_mem_access(struct xe_device *xe)
>+static inline bool xe_device_mem_access_ongoing(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
>-	XE_WARN_ON(!xe->mem_access.ref);
>+	return atomic_read(&xe->mem_access.ref);
> }
>
>-static inline bool xe_device_mem_access_ongoing(struct xe_device *xe)
>+static inline void xe_device_assert_mem_access(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
>-	bool ret;
>-
>-	mutex_lock(&xe->mem_access.lock);
>-	ret = xe->mem_access.ref;
>-	mutex_unlock(&xe->mem_access.lock);
>-
>-	return ret;
>+	XE_WARN_ON(!xe_device_mem_access_ongoing(xe));
> }
>
> static inline bool xe_device_in_fault_mode(struct xe_device *xe)
>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>index 9743987fc883..0b8c4ee0ad48 100644
>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h
>@@ -230,10 +230,8 @@ struct xe_device {
> 	 * triggering additional actions when they occur.
> 	 */
> 	struct {
>-		/** @lock: protect the ref count */
>-		struct mutex lock;
> 		/** @ref: ref count of memory accesses */
>-		s32 ref;
>+		atomic_t ref;
> 		/** @hold_rpm: need to put rpm ref back at the end */
> 		bool hold_rpm;
> 	} mem_access;
>-- 
>2.34.1
>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list