[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: make compound literal initialization const
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Mar 9 22:18:56 UTC 2023
On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 02:17:46PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Be careful about having const in the compound literal initialization to
> keep the initializers in rodata. Here, the impact is 1.8k of mutable
> data moved to rodata.
is there any static tool/script that we could run along with checkpatch
to prevent these?
>
> add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 0/0 up/down: 0/-1804 (-1804)
> Data old new delta
> __compound_literal 1804 - -1804
> Total: Before=42425, After=40621, chg -4.25%
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 1/0 up/down: 1804/0 (1804)
> RO Data old new delta
> __compound_literal 7696 9500 +1804
> Total: Before=138535, After=140339, chg +1.30
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.h
> index bd44fd8bbe05..8fc393ef7358 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.h
> @@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ struct xe_reg_sr;
> */
> #define XE_RTP_RULES(r1, ...) \
> .n_rules = COUNT_ARGS(r1, ##__VA_ARGS__), \
> - .rules = (struct xe_rtp_rule[]) { \
> + .rules = (const struct xe_rtp_rule[]) { \
> CALL_FOR_EACH(__ADD_XE_RTP_RULE_PREFIX, r1, ##__VA_ARGS__) \
> }
>
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ struct xe_reg_sr;
> */
> #define XE_RTP_ACTIONS(a1, ...) \
> .n_actions = COUNT_ARGS(a1, ##__VA_ARGS__), \
> - .actions = (struct xe_rtp_action[]) { \
> + .actions = (const struct xe_rtp_action[]) { \
> CALL_FOR_EACH(__ADD_XE_RTP_ACTION_PREFIX, a1, ##__VA_ARGS__) \
> }
>
> --
> 2.39.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list