[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/xe: Add basic unit tests for rtp
Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Tue Mar 21 13:11:16 UTC 2023
Hey,
On 2023-03-16 22:03, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> Add some basic unit tests for rtp. This is intended to prove the
> functionality of the rtp itself, like coalescing entries, rejecting
> non-disjoint values, etc.
>
> Contrary to the other tests in xe, this is a unit test to test the
> sw-side only, so it can be executed on any machine - it doesn't interact
> with the real hardware. For that a mock was provided with the minimum
> initialization needed. Running it produces the following output:
>
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --raw_output \
> --kunitconfig drivers/gpu/drm/xe/.kunitconfig xe_rtp
> ...
> [13:46:14] Starting KUnit Kernel (1/1)...
> KTAP version 1
> 1..1
> KTAP version 1
> # Subtest: xe_rtp
> 1..3
> ok 1 xe_rtp_process_basic
> [drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 0001 (clear: 00000001, set: 00000001, masked: no): ret=-22
> [drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 0001 (clear: 00000003, set: 00000003, masked: no): ret=-22
> ok 2 xe_rtp_process_dup
> [drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 0001 (clear: 00000001, set: 00000001, masked: no): ret=-22
> [drm:xe_reg_sr_add] *ERROR* Discarding save-restore reg 0001 (clear: 00000003, set: 00000003, masked: no): ret=-22
> ok 3 xe_rtp_process_incompat_types
> # xe_rtp: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3
> ok 1 xe_rtp
> [13:46:14] Elapsed time: 6.800s total, 0.002s configuring, 6.682s building, 0.073s running
>
> Note that the ERRORs in the kernel log are expected since it's testing
> non-disjoint or incompatible entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi<lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.debug | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/Makefile | 7 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp.c | 201 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c | 71 +++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.h | 15 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c | 4 +
> 6 files changed, 297 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.debug b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.debug
> index 93b284cdd0a2..11bb13c73e7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ config DRM_XE_KUNIT_TEST
> depends on DRM_XE && KUNIT && DEBUG_FS
> default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
> select DRM_EXPORT_FOR_TESTS if m
> + select DRM_KUNIT_TEST_HELPERS
> help
> Choose this option to allow the driver to perform selftests under
> the kunit framework
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/Makefile
> index 47056b6459e3..c5c2f108d017 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/Makefile
> @@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> -obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_KUNIT_TEST) += xe_bo_test.o xe_dma_buf_test.o \
> - xe_migrate_test.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_XE_KUNIT_TEST) += \
> + xe_bo_test.o \
> + xe_dma_buf_test.o \
> + xe_migrate_test.o \
> + xe_rtp_test.o
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..196a7223c807
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 AND MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "tests/xe_rtp_test.h"
> +
> +#include <linux/string.h>
> +#include <linux/xarray.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +#include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
> +#include "regs/xe_reg_defs.h"
> +#include "xe_rtp.h"
> +
> +#undef _MMIO
> +#undef MCR_REG
> +#define _MMIO(x) _XE_RTP_REG(x)
> +#define MCR_REG(x) _XE_RTP_MCR_REG(x)
> +
> +#define REGULAR_REG1 _MMIO(1)
> +#define REGULAR_REG2 _MMIO(2)
> +#define REGULAR_REG3 _MMIO(3)
> +#define MCR_REG1 MCR_REG(1)
> +#define MCR_REG2 MCR_REG(2)
> +#define MCR_REG3 MCR_REG(3)
> +
> +static bool match_yes(const struct xe_gt *gt, const struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static bool match_no(const struct xe_gt *gt, const struct xe_hw_engine *hwe)
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Basic entries: same register, only one action, disjoint values */
> +static const struct xe_rtp_entry basic_entries[] = {
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("basic-yes-1"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(0)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("basic-yes-2"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(1)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("basic-no-3"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_no)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(2)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("basic-no-4"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes), FUNC(match_no)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(3)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("basic-yes-clr-1"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(CLR(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(4)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("basic-yes-clr-2"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(CLR(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(5)))
> + },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +void xe_rtp_process_basic(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = test->priv;
> + struct xe_reg_sr *reg_sr = &xe->gt[0].reg_sr;
> + const struct xe_rtp_entry *rtp_entry;
> + const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *sre, *sr_entry = NULL;
> + unsigned long idx, count = 0, set_bits = 0, clr_bits = 0;
> +
> + xe_reg_sr_init(reg_sr, "basic", xe);
> + xe_rtp_process(basic_entries, reg_sr, &xe->gt[0], NULL);
> +
> + xa_for_each(®_sr->xa, idx, sre) {
> + count++;
> + sr_entry = sre;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Same REGULAR_REG1 register being used: all the entries should
> + * coalesce into a single entry
> + */
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, count, 1);
> +
> + /* Only bits in the entries named *-yes* are set */
> + for (rtp_entry = basic_entries; rtp_entry && rtp_entry->name; rtp_entry++) {
> + if (!strstr(rtp_entry->name, "-yes"))
> + continue;
> +
> + clr_bits |= rtp_entry->actions[0].clr_bits;
> + set_bits |= rtp_entry->actions[0].set_bits;
> + }
> +
> + /* implementation detail of RTP - SET() also clears */
> + clr_bits |= set_bits;
> +
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, clr_bits, sr_entry->clr_bits);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, set_bits, sr_entry->set_bits);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xe_rtp_process_basic);
> +
> +/*
> + * Duplicate entries - same register register, only one action,
> + * with actions trying to set/clear bits already changed in previous entries
> + */
> +static const struct xe_rtp_entry dup_entries[] = {
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("dup-entries-yes-1"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(0)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("dup-entries-no-2"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + /* should be dropped as it's the same as a previous */
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(0)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("dup-entries-no-3"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + /* should be dropped as not disjoint */
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_GENMASK(1, 0)))
> + },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +void xe_rtp_process_dup(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = test->priv;
> + struct xe_reg_sr *reg_sr = &xe->gt[0].reg_sr;
> + const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *sre, *sr_entry = NULL;
> + unsigned long idx, count = 0;
> +
> + xe_reg_sr_init(reg_sr, "duplicate values", xe);
> + xe_rtp_process(dup_entries, reg_sr, &xe->gt[0], NULL);
> +
> + xa_for_each(®_sr->xa, idx, sre) {
> + count++;
> + sr_entry = sre;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Same REGULAR_REG1 register being used: all the entries should
> + * coalesce into a single entry
> + */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sr_entry->set_bits, REG_BIT(0));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xe_rtp_process_dup);
> +
> +/*
> + * Incompatible types: same register register, but entries trying to set the
> + * same register passing incompatible types (masked / mcr)
> + */
> +static const struct xe_rtp_entry incompat_types_entries[] = {
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("incompat-types-yes-1"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(0)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("incompat-types-no-2"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + /* dropped since has incompatible type with previous entry */
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(MCR_REG1, REG_BIT(1)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("incompat-types-no-3"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + /* dropped since has incompatible type with previous entry */
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(REGULAR_REG1, REG_BIT(2),
> + XE_RTP_ACTION_FLAG(MASKED_REG)))
> + },
> + { XE_RTP_NAME("incompat-types-no-3"),
> + XE_RTP_RULES(FUNC(match_yes)),
> + /* dropped since has incompatible type with previous entry */
> + XE_RTP_ACTIONS(SET(MCR_REG1, REG_BIT(3),
> + XE_RTP_ACTION_FLAG(MASKED_REG)))
> + },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +void xe_rtp_process_incompat_types(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct xe_device *xe = test->priv;
> + struct xe_reg_sr *reg_sr = &xe->gt[0].reg_sr;
> + const struct xe_reg_sr_entry *sre, *sr_entry = NULL;
> + unsigned long idx, count = 0;
> +
> + xe_reg_sr_init(reg_sr, "incompatible types", xe);
> + xe_rtp_process(dup_entries, reg_sr, &xe->gt[0], NULL);
> +
> + xa_for_each(®_sr->xa, idx, sre) {
> + count++;
> + sr_entry = sre;
> + }
> +
> + /* Just the first entry is added, the rest are incompatible */
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, count, 1);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sr_entry->set_bits, REG_BIT(0));
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(xe_rtp_process_incompat_types);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..9340ce44c7be
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "xe_rtp_test.h"
> +
> +#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_kunit_helpers.h>
> +
> +#include <kunit/test.h>
> +
> +#include "xe_device_types.h"
> +
> +static void mock_xe_device_init(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + xe->gt[0].xe = xe;
> +}
> +
> +struct xe_rtp_test_priv {
> + struct xe_device xe;
> + struct device *dev;
> +};
> +
> +static int xe_rtp_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct xe_rtp_test_priv *priv;
> + struct device *dev;
> +
> + dev = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_device(test);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, dev);
> +
> + priv = drm_kunit_helper_alloc_drm_device(test, dev,
> + struct xe_rtp_test_priv,
> + xe.drm,
> + DRIVER_GEM | DRIVER_RENDER |
> + DRIVER_SYNCOBJ | DRIVER_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE);
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, priv);
> +
> + mock_xe_device_init(&priv->xe);
> + priv->dev = dev;
> + test->priv = priv;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Would it be a good idea to put dev inside xe->drm.dev instead? I'm not sure if it
has side effects though.
Alternatively, assign test->priv to &priv->xe and put a container_of macro inside
test_exit, so this works regardless of xe_rtp_test_priv memory layout (struct randomization).
With this fixed in either way:
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst<maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> +static void xe_rtp_test_exit(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct xe_rtp_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
> +
> + drm_kunit_helper_free_device(test, priv->dev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct kunit_case xe_rtp_tests[] = {
> + KUNIT_CASE(xe_rtp_process_basic),
> + KUNIT_CASE(xe_rtp_process_dup),
> + KUNIT_CASE(xe_rtp_process_incompat_types),
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +static struct kunit_suite xe_rtp_test_suite = {
> + .name = "xe_rtp",
> + .init = xe_rtp_test_init,
> + .exit = xe_rtp_test_exit,
> + .test_cases = xe_rtp_tests,
> +};
> +
> +kunit_test_suite(xe_rtp_test_suite);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a2f1437d6299
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/tests/xe_rtp_test.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 AND MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2023 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _XE_RTP_TEST_H_
> +#define _XE_RTP_TEST_H_
> +
> +struct kunit;
> +
> +void xe_rtp_process_basic(struct kunit *test);
> +void xe_rtp_process_dup(struct kunit *test);
> +void xe_rtp_process_incompat_types(struct kunit *test);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
> index cb9dd894547d..f634558b6e50 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_rtp.c
> @@ -186,3 +186,7 @@ bool xe_rtp_match_first_gslice_fused_off(const struct xe_gt *gt,
>
> return dss >= dss_per_gslice;
> }
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_KUNIT_TEST)
> +#include "tests/xe_rtp.c"
> +#endif
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-xe/attachments/20230321/a1216405/attachment.htm>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list