[Intel-xe] [PATCH 5/6] drm/xe: Build soc files directly
Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Fri Mar 31 12:01:29 UTC 2023
On 2023-03-31 13:49, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Instead of making a copy that is hard to keep up to date, build the
>> source directly.
>>
>> Add a rule for soc_* files, and use those to build i915.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c | 30 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 8 +-
>> .../gpu/drm/xe/compat-i915-headers/i915_drv.h | 2 +-
>> .../soc}/intel_dram.h | 1 -
>> .../soc}/intel_pch.h | 0
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/intel_dram.c | 495 ------------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/intel_pch.c | 157 ------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_display.c | 2 +-
>> 9 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 669 deletions(-)
>> rename drivers/gpu/drm/xe/{display/ext => compat-i915-headers/soc}/intel_dram.h (80%)
>> rename drivers/gpu/drm/xe/{display/ext => compat-i915-headers/soc}/intel_pch.h (100%)
>> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/intel_dram.c
>> delete mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/display/ext/intel_pch.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> index 9649051ed8ed..13fe18a9372f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/soc/intel_dram.c
>> @@ -9,8 +9,12 @@
>> #include "i915_reg.h"
>> #include "intel_dram.h"
>> #include "intel_mchbar_regs.h"
>> -#include "intel_pcode.h"
>> +#ifdef I915
>> #include "vlv_sideband.h"
>> +#include "display/intel_de.h"
>> +#else
>> +#include "xe_de.h"
>> +#endif
>>
>> struct dram_dimm_info {
>> u16 size;
>> @@ -43,6 +47,8 @@ static const char *intel_dram_type_str(enum intel_dram_type type)
>>
>> #undef DRAM_TYPE_STR
>>
>> +#ifdef I915
>> +
>> static void pnv_detect_mem_freq(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> {
>> u32 tmp;
>> @@ -191,6 +197,9 @@ static void detect_mem_freq(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> if (i915->mem_freq)
>> drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "DDR speed: %d MHz\n", i915->mem_freq);
>> }
>> +#else
>> +#define detect_mem_freq(i915) do { } while (0)
>> +#endif
>>
>> static int intel_dimm_num_devices(const struct dram_dimm_info *dimm)
>> {
>> @@ -339,14 +348,12 @@ skl_dram_get_channels_info(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> u32 val;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - val = intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore,
>> - SKL_MAD_DIMM_CH0_0_0_0_MCHBAR_MCMAIN);
>> + val = intel_de_read(i915, SKL_MAD_DIMM_CH0_0_0_0_MCHBAR_MCMAIN);
> This isn't great, because those aren't DE registers. So this won't fly
> upstream.
Could we do this for xe instead?
#define intel_uncore_read(ignore, reg) xe_mmio_read32(i915, reg) ?
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list