[Intel-xe] [PATCH v2 28/31] drm/xe: Allow dma-fences as in-syncs for compute / faulting VM

Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Mon May 8 21:29:40 UTC 2023


On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 01:19:48AM +0000, Matthew Brost wrote:
> On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 03:43:15PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 05:17:24PM -0700, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > This is allowed per the dma-fencing rules.
> > 
> > it would be good a word saying 'why' we are doing this.
> > only because we can it doesn't mean we should...
> > 
> 
> This is allowed and encouraged the dma-fencing rule. This along with
> allowing compute VMs to export dma-fences on binds will result in a
> simpler compute UMD.
> 
> Sound ok?

makes sense. with that

Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>


> 
> Matt
>   
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> > > index 99f1ed87196d..1e4e4acb2c4a 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_sync.c
> > > @@ -105,6 +105,7 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> > >  {
> > >  	struct drm_xe_sync sync_in;
> > >  	int err;
> > > +	bool signal;
> > >  
> > >  	if (copy_from_user(&sync_in, sync_user, sizeof(*sync_user)))
> > >  		return -EFAULT;
> > > @@ -113,9 +114,10 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> > >  			 ~(SYNC_FLAGS_TYPE_MASK | DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL)))
> > >  		return -EINVAL;
> > >  
> > > +	signal = sync_in.flags & DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL;
> > >  	switch (sync_in.flags & SYNC_FLAGS_TYPE_MASK) {
> > >  	case DRM_XE_SYNC_SYNCOBJ:
> > > -		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, no_dma_fences))
> > > +		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, no_dma_fences && signal))
> > >  			return -ENOTSUPP;
> > >  
> > >  		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, upper_32_bits(sync_in.addr)))
> > > @@ -125,7 +127,7 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> > >  		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, !sync->syncobj))
> > >  			return -ENOENT;
> > >  
> > > -		if (!(sync_in.flags & DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL)) {
> > > +		if (!signal) {
> > >  			sync->fence = drm_syncobj_fence_get(sync->syncobj);
> > >  			if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, !sync->fence))
> > >  				return -EINVAL;
> > > @@ -133,7 +135,7 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> > >  		break;
> > >  
> > >  	case DRM_XE_SYNC_TIMELINE_SYNCOBJ:
> > > -		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, no_dma_fences))
> > > +		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, no_dma_fences && signal))
> > >  			return -ENOTSUPP;
> > >  
> > >  		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, upper_32_bits(sync_in.addr)))
> > > @@ -146,7 +148,7 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> > >  		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, !sync->syncobj))
> > >  			return -ENOENT;
> > >  
> > > -		if (sync_in.flags & DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL) {
> > > +		if (signal) {
> > >  			sync->chain_fence = dma_fence_chain_alloc();
> > >  			if (!sync->chain_fence)
> > >  				return -ENOMEM;
> > > @@ -168,7 +170,7 @@ int xe_sync_entry_parse(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_file *xef,
> > >  		break;
> > >  
> > >  	case DRM_XE_SYNC_USER_FENCE:
> > > -		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, !(sync_in.flags & DRM_XE_SYNC_SIGNAL)))
> > > +		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, !signal))
> > >  			return -ENOTSUPP;
> > >  
> > >  		if (XE_IOCTL_ERR(xe, sync_in.addr & 0x7))
> > > -- 
> > > 2.34.1
> > > 


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list