[Intel-xe] [PATCH v9 6/8] drm/xe/ct: drop mem_access_get from g2h_worker_func()
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at kernel.org
Tue May 23 13:04:08 UTC 2023
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 10:47:25AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> In the next patch we track the current task executing the runtime_pm
> callbacks, if any, in order to prevent the runtime_pm code waiting for
> itself and deadlocking when called from the callbacks. However with
> g2h_worker_func() we are processing g2h packets from a workqueue when
> receiving an interrupt. The runtime callbacks needs to talk to the GuC
> and so rely on this, however since these are processed from a workqueue
> the current task will be different and when calling something like
> mem_access_get() we deadlock. Callers should
> in theory
should we at least add an assert?
> already be
> holding an access.ref when talking to the GuC (CT communication looks to
> be disabled when suspending the GT).
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index 7a8c9d6a03f3..6e0d2d06b7f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -1081,7 +1081,6 @@ static void g2h_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
> struct xe_guc_ct *ct = container_of(w, struct xe_guc_ct, g2h_worker);
> int ret;
>
> - xe_device_mem_access_get(ct_to_xe(ct));
> do {
> mutex_lock(&ct->lock);
> ret = dequeue_one_g2h(ct);
> @@ -1095,7 +1094,6 @@ static void g2h_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
> kick_reset(ct);
> }
> } while (ret == 1);
> - xe_device_mem_access_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
> }
>
> static void guc_ctb_snapshot_capture(struct xe_device *xe, struct guc_ctb *ctb,
> --
> 2.40.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list