[Intel-xe] [RFC 02/11] drm: move lru_lock from ttm_device to drm_device
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Thu Nov 2 12:53:02 UTC 2023
Am 02.11.23 um 05:32 schrieb Oak Zeng:
> In the coming patches, we will share the lru list b/t
> ttm bo based memory allocator and hmm/svm based memory
> allocator. Thus lru_lock (which is used mainly to protect
> the lru list) is moved from struct ttm_device to struct
> drm_device, so this lock can be shared b/t those two
> memory allocators.
>
> To minimize code change, struct ttm_device still hold
> a weak reference of lru_lock, so ttm layer can still
> reference to this lock easily.
I would rather like to see drm_device to become the base class of
ttm_device.
Similar to how drm_gem_object is the base class of ttm_buffer_object.
That is probably a bit more work, but would also eliminate some of the
duplicate house keeping we currently have (e.g. bdev pointer in
ttm_buffer_object etc...).
Moving then stuff from the ttm_device into the drm_device becomes trivial.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 40 +++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c | 18 ++++-----
> drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 42 ++++++++++----------
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 4 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 4 +-
> include/drm/drm_device.h | 5 +++
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h | 4 +-
> include/drm/ttm/ttm_device.h | 4 +-
> 13 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> index f5daadcec865..747bcad86d5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vm.c
> @@ -368,9 +368,9 @@ int amdgpu_vm_lock_pd(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, struct drm_exec *exec,
> void amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_vm *vm)
> {
> - spin_lock(&adev->mman.bdev.lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(adev->mman.bdev.lru_lock);
> ttm_lru_bulk_move_tail(&vm->lru_bulk_move);
> - spin_unlock(&adev->mman.bdev.lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(adev->mman.bdev.lru_lock);
> }
>
> /* Create scheduler entities for page table updates */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> index c7085a747b03..b83e1741905e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
> @@ -290,9 +290,9 @@ static void amdgpu_vram_mgr_do_reserve(struct ttm_resource_manager *man)
>
> vis_usage = amdgpu_vram_mgr_vis_size(adev, block);
> atomic64_add(vis_usage, &mgr->vis_usage);
> - spin_lock(&man->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(man->bdev->lru_lock);
> man->usage += rsv->size;
> - spin_unlock(&man->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(man->bdev->lru_lock);
> list_move(&rsv->blocks, &mgr->reserved_pages);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> index 3eda026ffac6..1943c38815aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c
> @@ -623,6 +623,7 @@ static int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
>
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dev->managed.resources);
> spin_lock_init(&dev->managed.lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&dev->lru_lock);
>
> /* no per-device feature limits by default */
> dev->driver_features = ~0u;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> index 9227f8146a58..c46f54f83f54 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c
> @@ -984,7 +984,7 @@ void i915_ttm_adjust_lru(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> /*
> * Put on the correct LRU list depending on the MADV status
> */
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> if (shrinkable) {
> /* Try to keep shmem_tt from being considered for shrinking. */
> bo->priority = TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY - 1;
> @@ -1013,7 +1013,7 @@ void i915_ttm_adjust_lru(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> }
>
> ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(bo);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index e58b7e249816..26e0555bad0c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_mem_space_debug(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> * @bo: The buffer object.
> *
> * Move this BO to the tail of all lru lists used to lookup and reserve an
> - * object. This function must be called with struct ttm_global::lru_lock
> + * object. This function must be called with struct drm_device::lru_lock
> * held, and is used to make a BO less likely to be considered for eviction.
> */
> void ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> @@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ void ttm_bo_set_bulk_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> if (bo->bulk_move == bulk)
> return;
>
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> if (bo->resource)
> ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
> bo->bulk_move = bulk;
> if (bo->resource)
> ttm_resource_add_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_set_bulk_move);
>
> @@ -202,9 +202,9 @@ static int ttm_bo_individualize_resv(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> * reference it any more. The only tricky case is the trylock on
> * the resv object while holding the lru_lock.
> */
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> bo->base.resv = &bo->base._resv;
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> }
>
> return r;
> @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>
> if (unlock_resv)
> dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
>
> lret = dma_resv_wait_timeout(resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP,
> interruptible,
> @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> else if (lret == 0)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> if (unlock_resv && !dma_resv_trylock(bo->base.resv)) {
> /*
> * We raced, and lost, someone else holds the reservation now,
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> * delayed destruction would succeed, so just return success
> * here.
> */
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> ret = 0;
> @@ -285,11 +285,11 @@ static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> if (ret) {
> if (unlock_resv)
> dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> return ret;
> }
>
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(bo);
>
> if (unlock_resv)
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_release(struct kref *kref)
> ttm_bo_flush_all_fences(bo);
> bo->deleted = true;
>
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
>
> /*
> * Make pinned bos immediately available to
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_release(struct kref *kref)
> }
>
> kref_init(&bo->kref);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
>
> INIT_WORK(&bo->delayed_delete, ttm_bo_delayed_delete);
> queue_work(bdev->wq, &bo->delayed_delete);
> @@ -598,7 +598,7 @@ int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> bool locked = false;
> int ret;
>
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bdev->lru_lock);
> ttm_resource_manager_for_each_res(man, &cursor, res) {
> bool busy;
>
> @@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> if (!bo) {
> if (busy_bo && !ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(busy_bo))
> busy_bo = NULL;
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
> ret = ttm_mem_evict_wait_busy(busy_bo, ctx, ticket);
> if (busy_bo)
> ttm_bo_put(busy_bo);
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ int ttm_mem_evict_first(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> return ret;
> }
>
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
>
> ret = ttm_bo_evict(bo, ctx);
> if (locked)
> @@ -658,11 +658,11 @@ void ttm_bo_pin(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv);
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!kref_read(&bo->kref));
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> if (bo->resource)
> ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
> ++bo->pin_count;
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_pin);
>
> @@ -679,11 +679,11 @@ void ttm_bo_unpin(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->pin_count))
> return;
>
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> --bo->pin_count;
> if (bo->resource)
> ttm_resource_add_bulk_move(bo->resource, bo);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_unpin);
>
> @@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> }
>
> /* TODO: Cleanup the locking */
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
>
> /*
> * Move to system cached
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
> index 12014788b595..d18eca86ebd6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_device.c
> @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ int ttm_device_swapout(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> unsigned i;
> int ret;
>
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bdev->lru_lock);
> for (i = TTM_PL_SYSTEM; i < TTM_NUM_MEM_TYPES; ++i) {
> man = ttm_manager_type(bdev, i);
> if (!man || !man->use_tt)
> @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int ttm_device_swapout(struct ttm_device *bdev, struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
> return ret;
> }
> }
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_device_swapout);
> @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ int ttm_device_init(struct ttm_device *bdev, const struct ttm_device_funcs *func
> use_dma_alloc, use_dma32);
>
> bdev->vma_manager = vma_manager;
> - spin_lock_init(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + bdev->lru_lock = &drm->lru_lock;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdev->pinned);
> bdev->dev_mapping = mapping;
> mutex_lock(&ttm_global_mutex);
> @@ -244,11 +244,11 @@ void ttm_device_fini(struct ttm_device *bdev)
> drain_workqueue(bdev->wq);
> destroy_workqueue(bdev->wq);
>
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bdev->lru_lock);
> for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i)
> if (list_empty(&man->lru[0]))
> pr_debug("Swap list %d was clean\n", i);
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
>
> ttm_pool_fini(&bdev->pool);
> ttm_global_release();
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static void ttm_device_clear_lru_dma_mappings(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> {
> struct ttm_resource *res;
>
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bdev->lru_lock);
> while ((res = list_first_entry_or_null(list, typeof(*res), lru))) {
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = res->bo;
>
> @@ -269,15 +269,15 @@ static void ttm_device_clear_lru_dma_mappings(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> continue;
>
> list_del_init(&res->lru);
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
>
> if (bo->ttm)
> ttm_tt_unpopulate(bo->bdev, bo->ttm);
>
> ttm_bo_put(bo);
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bdev->lru_lock);
> }
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
> }
>
> void ttm_device_clear_dma_mappings(struct ttm_device *bdev)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> index 46ff9c75bb12..6ada77f51fba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_lru_bulk_move_init);
> * @bulk: bulk move structure
> *
> * Bulk move BOs to the LRU tail, only valid to use when driver makes sure that
> - * resource order never changes. Should be called with &ttm_device.lru_lock held.
> + * resource order never changes. Should be called with &drm_device.lru_lock held.
> */
> void ttm_lru_bulk_move_tail(struct ttm_lru_bulk_move *bulk)
> {
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ void ttm_lru_bulk_move_tail(struct ttm_lru_bulk_move *bulk)
> if (!pos->first)
> continue;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&pos->first->bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(pos->first->bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> dma_resv_assert_held(pos->first->bo->base.resv);
> dma_resv_assert_held(pos->last->bo->base.resv);
>
> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ void ttm_resource_move_to_lru_tail(struct ttm_resource *res)
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = res->bo;
> struct ttm_device *bdev = bo->bdev;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
>
> if (bo->pin_count) {
> list_move_tail(&res->lru, &bdev->pinned);
> @@ -191,13 +191,13 @@ void ttm_resource_init(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> res->bo = bo;
>
> man = ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, place->mem_type);
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> if (bo->pin_count)
> list_add_tail(&res->lru, &bo->bdev->pinned);
> else
> list_add_tail(&res->lru, &man->lru[bo->priority]);
> man->usage += res->size;
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_init);
>
> @@ -216,10 +216,10 @@ void ttm_resource_fini(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> {
> struct ttm_device *bdev = man->bdev;
>
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bdev->lru_lock);
> list_del_init(&res->lru);
> man->usage -= res->size;
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_fini);
>
> @@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ int ttm_resource_alloc(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> ttm_resource_add_bulk_move(*res_ptr, bo);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ void ttm_resource_free(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, struct ttm_resource **res)
> if (!*res)
> return;
>
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> ttm_resource_del_bulk_move(*res, bo);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> man = ttm_manager_type(bo->bdev, (*res)->mem_type);
> man->func->free(man, *res);
> *res = NULL;
> @@ -368,9 +368,9 @@ bool ttm_resource_compat(struct ttm_resource *res,
> void ttm_resource_set_bo(struct ttm_resource *res,
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> res->bo = bo;
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -424,18 +424,18 @@ int ttm_resource_manager_evict_all(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> * Can't use standard list traversal since we're unlocking.
> */
>
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bdev->lru_lock);
> for (i = 0; i < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY; ++i) {
> while (!list_empty(&man->lru[i])) {
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
> ret = ttm_mem_evict_first(bdev, man, NULL, &ctx,
> NULL);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> - spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bdev->lru_lock);
> }
> }
> - spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bdev->lru_lock);
>
> spin_lock(&man->move_lock);
> fence = dma_fence_get(man->move);
> @@ -463,9 +463,9 @@ uint64_t ttm_resource_manager_usage(struct ttm_resource_manager *man)
> {
> uint64_t usage;
>
> - spin_lock(&man->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(man->bdev->lru_lock);
> usage = man->usage;
> - spin_unlock(&man->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(man->bdev->lru_lock);
> return usage;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_manager_usage);
> @@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ ttm_resource_manager_first(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> {
> struct ttm_resource *res;
>
> - lockdep_assert_held(&man->bdev->lru_lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(man->bdev->lru_lock);
>
> for (cursor->priority = 0; cursor->priority < TTM_MAX_BO_PRIORITY;
> ++cursor->priority)
> @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ ttm_resource_manager_next(struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
> struct ttm_resource_cursor *cursor,
> struct ttm_resource *res)
> {
> - lockdep_assert_held(&man->bdev->lru_lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(man->bdev->lru_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry_continue(res, &man->lru[cursor->priority], lru)
> return res;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> index 25fdc04627ca..827f798cccc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
> @@ -946,9 +946,9 @@ static bool xe_ttm_bo_lock_in_destructor(struct ttm_buffer_object *ttm_bo)
> * the ttm_bo refcount is zero at this point. So trylocking *should*
> * always succeed here, as long as we hold the lru lock.
> */
> - spin_lock(&ttm_bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(ttm_bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> locked = dma_resv_trylock(ttm_bo->base.resv);
> - spin_unlock(&ttm_bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(ttm_bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> XE_WARN_ON(!locked);
>
> return locked;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> index 890fadb0a93e..dafebdfb2368 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
> @@ -370,9 +370,9 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
> xe_vm_reactivate_rebind(vm);
>
> if (!err && !xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm)) {
> - spin_lock(&xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> ttm_lru_bulk_move_tail(&vm->lru_bulk_move);
> - spin_unlock(&xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> }
>
> err_repin:
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> index a6a0f17fec1d..44e038276d41 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c
> @@ -651,9 +651,9 @@ static void preempt_rebind_work_func(struct work_struct *w)
>
> #undef retry_required
>
> - spin_lock(&vm->xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(vm->xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> ttm_lru_bulk_move_tail(&vm->lru_bulk_move);
> - spin_unlock(&vm->xe->ttm.lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(vm->xe->ttm.lru_lock);
>
> /* Point of no return. */
> arm_preempt_fences(vm, &preempt_fences);
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_device.h b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> index 7cf4afae2e79..d0b5f42786be 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_device.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_device.h
> @@ -326,6 +326,11 @@ struct drm_device {
> */
> struct list_head debugfs_list;
>
> + /**
> + * @lru_lock: Protection for the per manager LRU and destroy lists.
> + */
> + spinlock_t lru_lock;
> +
> /* Everything below here is for legacy driver, never use! */
> /* private: */
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_LEGACY)
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> index 0223a41a64b2..49f32df32204 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> @@ -290,9 +290,9 @@ void ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
> static inline void
> ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail_unlocked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
> {
> - spin_lock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_lock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> ttm_bo_move_to_lru_tail(bo);
> - spin_unlock(&bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> + spin_unlock(bo->bdev->lru_lock);
> }
>
> static inline void ttm_bo_assign_mem(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_device.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_device.h
> index bab868d55383..4d29e96bd892 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_device.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_device.h
> @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ struct ttm_device {
> struct ttm_pool pool;
>
> /**
> - * @lru_lock: Protection for the per manager LRU and ddestroy lists.
> + * @lru_lock: Weak reference to drm_device::lru_lock.
> */
> - spinlock_t lru_lock;
> + spinlock_t *lru_lock;
>
> /**
> * @pinned: Buffer objects which are pinned and so not on any LRU list.
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list