[Intel-xe] [PATCH 01/26] drm/xe: Allow num_binds == 0 in VM bind IOCTL

Thomas Hellström thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Mon Nov 6 14:05:03 UTC 2023


On 11/6/23 14:16, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/26/23 06:01, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> The idea being out-syncs can signal indicating all previous operations
>> on the bind queue are complete. An example use case of this would be
>> support for implementing vkQueueWaitForIdle easily.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
>
> Do we actually create a gpu job when num_binds == 0 so that in-fences 
> and waiting for previous binds actually work as intended even when we 
> remove the async queue?

Or to rephrase since the async queue is actually already removed, 
Similar to review for patch 2 / 26 Do we ensure correct ordering even in 
the presence of in-fences here?

/Thomas



>
> /Thomas
>
>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list