[Intel-xe] [RFC v2 2/6] drm/xe/xe2: Determine bios enablement for flat ccs on igfx.
Matthew Auld
matthew.william.auld at gmail.com
Thu Nov 23 16:37:38 UTC 2023
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 10:01, Himal Prasad Ghimiray
<himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com> wrote:
>
> If bios disables flat ccs on igfx make has_flat_ccs as 0 and notify
> via drm_info.
>
> Bspec:59255
>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
Huh, I wonder if that explains why on some particular LNL DUTs
compression just didn't seem to "work" for me.
So should this information be passed along to userspace via some query
uAPI? Maybe there is some tradeoff between enabling compression and
other features (like coherency), and so knowing this might be useful?
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h | 3 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> index cc27fe8fc363..b642301947f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
> @@ -142,6 +142,9 @@
> #define XEHP_SLICE_COMMON_ECO_CHICKEN1 XE_REG_MCR(0x731c, XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED)
> #define MSC_MSAA_REODER_BUF_BYPASS_DISABLE REG_BIT(14)
>
> +#define XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_LOWER XE_REG_MCR(0x8800)
> +#define XE2_FLAT_CCS_ENABLE REG_BIT(0)
> +
> #define VF_PREEMPTION XE_REG(0x83a4, XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED)
> #define PREEMPTION_VERTEX_COUNT REG_GENMASK(15, 0)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> index 8be765adf702..07a3e4cf48d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <drm/xe_drm.h>
>
> #include "regs/xe_regs.h"
> +#include "regs/xe_gt_regs.h"
> #include "xe_bo.h"
> #include "xe_debugfs.h"
> #include "xe_display.h"
> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@
> #include "xe_exec_queue.h"
> #include "xe_exec.h"
> #include "xe_gt.h"
> +#include "xe_gt_mcr.h"
> #include "xe_irq.h"
> #include "xe_mmio.h"
> #include "xe_module.h"
> @@ -342,6 +344,29 @@ static void xe_device_sanitize(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg)
> xe_gt_sanitize(gt);
> }
>
> +static int xe_device_set_has_flat_ccs(struct xe_device *xe)
> +{
> + u32 reg;
> + int err;
> +
> + if (IS_DGFX(xe) || GRAPHICS_VER(xe) < 20 || !xe->info.has_flat_ccs)
> + return 0;
> +
> + struct xe_gt *gt = xe_root_mmio_gt(xe);
> +
> + err = xe_force_wake_get(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> + reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_LOWER);
> + xe->info.has_flat_ccs = (reg & XE2_FLAT_CCS_ENABLE);
> +
> + if (!xe->info.has_flat_ccs)
> + drm_info(&xe->drm,
> + "Flat CCS has been disabled in bios, May lead to performance impact");
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> {
> struct xe_tile *tile;
> @@ -352,6 +377,7 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> xe_pat_init_early(xe);
>
> xe->info.mem_region_mask = 1;
> +
> err = xe_display_init_nommio(xe);
> if (err)
> return err;
> @@ -390,6 +416,10 @@ int xe_device_probe(struct xe_device *xe)
> goto err_irq_shutdown;
> }
>
> + err = xe_device_set_has_flat_ccs(xe);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> +
> err = xe_mmio_probe_vram(xe);
> if (err)
> goto err_irq_shutdown;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list