[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/i915: Abstract display info away during probe
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Mon Oct 2 19:46:09 UTC 2023
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 07:58:30PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2023, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:41:14AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Fri, 29 Sep 2023, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com> wrote:
> >> > The goal is to have this function ready for Xe to use
> >> > directly. So, let's use the available macro.
> >>
> >> Seesm wrong to use DISPLAY_INFO() as an lvalue
> >
> > to be really honestly I don't like that either.
> > I barely like macros, specially used like this.
> >
> >> and I'm not sure why
> >> this wouldn't work as-is.
> >
> > I should probably had collected some logs and added to the
> > commit message. But the thing was that without this assignment,
> > (xe)->info.display was NULL and the memcpy below was exploding
> > with NULL dereference.
>
> Aww crap. That's because both DISPLAY_INFO() and DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO()
> in xe are completely bogus.
>
> They should be
>
> #define DISPLAY_INFO(i915) ((i915)->display.info.__device_info)
> #define DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915) (&(i915)->display.info.__runtime_info)
>
> instead of
>
> #define DISPLAY_INFO(xe) ((xe)->info.display)
> #define DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(xe) (&(xe)->info.display_runtime)
>
> and these should be removed from struct xe_device info member:
>
> const struct intel_display_device_info *display;
> struct intel_display_runtime_info display_runtime;
but in this case we would need the macros in Xe to resolve the access
to these items anyway right?!
or how should we handle cases like 'if (xe->info.display_runtime.pipe_mask)' ?
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> >
> >>
> >> But *shrug*.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> >
> > thanks, pushed as is.
> >
> >>
> >> for merging to i915. (xe should come as a backport with cherry-pick -x.)
> >
> > and sent the proper backported cherry-pick to intel-xe ml.
> >
> >>
> >> BR,
> >> Jani
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 2 +-
> >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> >> > index a6a18eae7ae8..ce55b968e658 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
> >> > @@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ void intel_display_device_probe(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> >> > else
> >> > info = probe_display(i915);
> >> >
> >> > - i915->display.info.__device_info = info;
> >> > + DISPLAY_INFO(i915) = info;
> >> >
> >> > memcpy(DISPLAY_RUNTIME_INFO(i915),
> >> > &DISPLAY_INFO(i915)->__runtime_defaults,
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jani Nikula, Intel
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list