[Intel-xe] [PATCH v5 5/7] drm/sched: Split free_job into own work item

[Luben Tuikov]

On 2023-10-13 22:49, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> On 2023-10-11 19:58, Matthew Brost wrote:
>> Rather than call free_job and run_job in same work item have a dedicated
>> work item for each. This aligns with the design and intended use of work
>> queues.
>>
>> v2:
>>    - Test for DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT before setting
>>      timestamp in free_job() work item (Danilo)
>> v3:
>>   - Drop forward dec of drm_sched_select_entity (Boris)
>>   - Return in drm_sched_run_job_work if entity NULL (Boris)
>> v4:
>>   - Replace dequeue with peek and invert logic (Luben)
>>   - Wrap to 100 lines (Luben)
>>   - Update comments for *_queue / *_queue_if_ready functions (Luben)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> 
> I wasn't able to apply this patch on top of drm-misc-next at a48e2cc92835fa.
> 
> Create a branch off of a *clean* drm-misc-next and rebase/reapply/cherry-pick all
> 7 patches on top of that clean drm-misc-next branch. You should also run
> scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict on all your patches, or integrate it into the precommit
> hook, see githooks(5), so you don't have to run it manually.
> 
> Set format.useAutobase to whenAble somewhere in your Git configs (global/local),
> or use --base=auto to git-format-patch when you format your patches before
> git-send-email-ing them.
> 
> Repost your patches.
> 
> The base commit will be added to the bottom of the cover letter. It should
> be an ancestor (or tip) of drm-misc-next (git branch --contains <base> --list etc.).
> If it is not, your base tree wasn't clean, and you should redo this process.

Poking around I found out that this patch set is based off of drm-misc-fixes.
Had the base been included, it would've made this easier.
-- 
Regards,
Luben