[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe: use variable instead of multiple function calls

Dani Liberman dliberman at habana.ai
Mon Oct 30 19:38:50 UTC 2023


Also changed to positive logic which is more readable.

Signed-off-by: Dani Liberman <dliberman at habana.ai>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
index 28e84a0bbeb0..2de6c2c05078 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_exec.c
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 	struct xe_sched_job *job;
 	struct dma_fence *rebind_fence;
 	struct xe_vm *vm;
-	bool write_locked;
+	bool write_locked, vm_with_dma_fences;
 	ktime_t end = 0;
 	int err = 0;
 
@@ -196,8 +196,9 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 		}
 	}
 
+	vm_with_dma_fences = !xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm);
 retry:
-	if (!xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm) && xe_vm_userptr_check_repin(vm)) {
+	if (vm_with_dma_fences && xe_vm_userptr_check_repin(vm)) {
 		err = down_write_killable(&vm->lock);
 		write_locked = true;
 	} else {
@@ -279,7 +280,7 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 	}
 
 	/* Wait behind munmap style rebinds */
-	if (!xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm)) {
+	if (vm_with_dma_fences) {
 		err = drm_sched_job_add_resv_dependencies(&job->drm,
 							  &vm->resv,
 							  DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL);
@@ -292,7 +293,7 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 	if (err)
 		goto err_put_job;
 
-	if (!xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm)) {
+	if (vm_with_dma_fences) {
 		err = down_read_interruptible(&vm->userptr.notifier_lock);
 		if (err)
 			goto err_put_job;
@@ -307,7 +308,7 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 	 * the job and let the DRM scheduler / backend clean up the job.
 	 */
 	xe_sched_job_arm(job);
-	if (!xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm)) {
+	if (vm_with_dma_fences) {
 		/* Block userptr invalidations / BO eviction */
 		dma_resv_add_fence(&vm->resv,
 				   &job->drm.s_fence->finished,
@@ -330,14 +331,14 @@ int xe_exec_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, struct drm_file *file)
 	xe_sched_job_push(job);
 	xe_vm_reactivate_rebind(vm);
 
-	if (!err && !xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm)) {
+	if (!err && vm_with_dma_fences) {
 		spin_lock(&xe->ttm.lru_lock);
 		ttm_lru_bulk_move_tail(&vm->lru_bulk_move);
 		spin_unlock(&xe->ttm.lru_lock);
 	}
 
 err_repin:
-	if (!xe_vm_no_dma_fences(vm))
+	if (vm_with_dma_fences)
 		up_read(&vm->userptr.notifier_lock);
 err_put_job:
 	if (err)
-- 
2.34.1



More information about the Intel-xe mailing list