[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/pat: Use 0 instead of space on error

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Wed Sep 6 20:53:43 UTC 2023


On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 04:59:39PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2023-09-06 16:30:09-03:00)
>>Use 0 in format string instead of space so it shows as
>>
>>        [drm] *ERROR* Missing PAT table for platform with graphics version 20.04!
>>
>>instead of
>>
>>        [drm] *ERROR* Missing PAT table for platform with graphics version 20. 4!
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>>---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>index b56a65779d26..71e0e047fff3 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pat.c
>>@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ void xe_pat_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>>                  * raise an error rather than trying to silently inherit the
>>                  * most recent platform's behavior.
>>                  */
>>-                drm_err(&xe->drm, "Missing PAT table for platform with graphics version %d.%2d!\n",
>>+                drm_err(&xe->drm, "Missing PAT table for platform with graphics version %d.%02d!\n",
>>                         GRAPHICS_VER(xe), GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) % 100);
>
>Maybe we should have a standard way of putting versions in formatted strings?
>
>Thinking about something like:
>
>    drm_err(&xe->drm, "Missing PAT table for platform with graphics version " XE_IP_VER_FMT "!\n",
>            XE_IP_VER_FMT_ARGS(GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe)));

I think it's too much of an abstraction that nobody will remember when
moving code around.

>
>The macro names are kinda long though...
>
>Anyways,
>
>Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>

thanks
Lucas De Marchi

>
>>         }
>> }
>>--
>>2.40.1
>>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list