[Intel-xe] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 02/27] drm/i915/lnl: Add display definitions

[Lucas De Marchi]

On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 09:10:44AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 07, 2023 at 08:37:32AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> From: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan at intel.com>
>>
>> Add Lunar Lake platform definitions for i915 display. The support for
>> LNL will be added to the xe driver, with i915 only driving the display
>> side. Therefore define IS_LUNARLAKE to 0 to disable it when building the
>> i915 module.
>
>This final sentence no longer matches the patch.  But it might be worth
>adding a different sentence saying something like "Xe2 display is
>derived from the Xe_LPD+ IP; additional feature deltas will be
>introduced in subsequent patches."
>
>>
>> v2: Use a LPDP_FEATURES macro (Matt Roper)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c | 7 +++++++
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
>> index 089674e2f1d2..feafb0f94b06 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_device.c
>> @@ -768,6 +768,12 @@ static const struct intel_display_device_info xe_lpdp_display = {
>>  	.__runtime_defaults.fbc_mask = BIT(INTEL_FBC_A) | BIT(INTEL_FBC_B),
>>  };
>>
>> +static const struct intel_display_device_info xe2_lpd_display = {
>> +	XE_LPDP_FEATURES,
>> +
>> +	.__runtime_defaults.ip.ver = 20,
>
>There's no need to set a default value here, right?  If we've managed to

unless we have a broken check for display version before this is
initialized. I will give it a try and see what happens.

But if we remove it here, we should also remove on previous patch.  As
far as I can see, it's true for Xe-LPD+ too. If we have a wrong check
for version, I'd rather prefer it broken and a loud warning than it
matching version 14 due to using the macro above.

Lucas De Marchi

>match this IP block, we already read out the GMD ID version and matched
>it against the table below.  We'll be assigning the real value directly
>and shouldn't need this for anything.
>
>
>Matt
>
>> +};
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Separate detection for no display cases to keep the display id array simple.
>>   *
>> @@ -847,6 +853,7 @@ static const struct {
>>  	const struct intel_display_device_info *display;
>>  } gmdid_display_map[] = {
>>  	{ 14,  0, &xe_lpdp_display },
>> +	{ 20,  0, &xe2_lpd_display },
>>  };
>>
>>  static const struct intel_display_device_info *
>> --
>> 2.40.1
>>
>
>-- 
>Matt Roper
>Graphics Software Engineer
>Linux GPU Platform Enablement
>Intel Corporation