[Intel-xe] [PATCH] drm/xe/irq: Clear GFX_MSTR_IRQ as part of IRQ reset

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Wed Sep 20 04:08:04 UTC 2023


On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 02:35:51PM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>Quoting Lucas De Marchi (2023-09-19 14:31:24-03:00)
>>On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:41:10AM -0300, Gustavo Sousa wrote:
>>>Starting with Xe_LP+, GFX_MSTR_IRQ contains status bits that have W1C
>>>behavior. If we do not properly reset them, we would miss delivery of
>>>interrupts if a pending bit is set when enabling IRQs.
>>>
>>>As an example, the display part of our probe routine contains paths
>>>where we wait for vblank interrupts. If a display interrupt was already
>>>pending when enabling IRQs, we would time out waiting for the vblank.
>>>
>>>That in fact happened recently when modprobing Xe on a Lunar Lake with a
>>>specific configuration; and that's how we found out we were missing this
>>>step in the IRQ enabling logic.
>>>
>>>Fix the issue by clearing GFX_MSTR_IRQ as part of the IRQ reset.
>>>
>>>BSpec: 50875, 54028, 62357
>>>Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa at intel.com>
>>>---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
>>>index ccb934f8fa34..3746e9204e48 100644
>>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
>>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_irq.c
>>>@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ static irqreturn_t dg1_irq_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>>>
>>> static void gt_irq_reset(struct xe_tile *tile)
>>> {
>>>+        struct xe_device *xe = tile_to_xe(tile);
>>>         struct xe_gt *mmio = tile->primary_gt;
>>>
>>>         u32 ccs_mask = xe_hw_engine_mask_per_class(tile->primary_gt,
>>>@@ -463,6 +464,9 @@ static void gt_irq_reset(struct xe_tile *tile)
>>>         u32 bcs_mask = xe_hw_engine_mask_per_class(tile->primary_gt,
>>>                                                    XE_ENGINE_CLASS_COPY);
>>>
>>>+        if (GRAPHICS_VERx100(xe) >= 1210)
>>>+                xe_mmio_write32(mmio, GFX_MSTR_IRQ, ~0);
>>
>>shouldn´t you exclude bit 31 (MSTR_INT) since it'ss not a status bit
>>and would rather enable the interrupts... ?
>
>I thought about that, but looking closer at the BSpec for that register, that
>bit seems not to exist for the targeted graphics IPs.

true, I missed that... but then this would be a weird place to reset
it. We already forked the irq setup in xe_irq_reset(). Also, this
is going to be called for each gt, which doesn't seem right.
Better to move it to dg1_irq_reset().

Lucas De Marchi

>
>Gustavo Sousa
>
>>
>>Lucas De Marchi
>>
>>>+
>>>         /* Disable RCS, BCS, VCS and VECS class engines. */
>>>         xe_mmio_write32(mmio, RENDER_COPY_INTR_ENABLE, 0);
>>>         xe_mmio_write32(mmio, VCS_VECS_INTR_ENABLE, 0);
>>>--
>>>2.42.0
>>>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list