[Intel-xe] [PATCH 2/3] drm/vblank: Warn when silently cancelling vblank works
Lyude Paul
lyude at redhat.com
Wed Sep 20 19:55:28 UTC 2023
Good point!
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
On Wed, 2023-09-20 at 17:03 +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>
> Silently cancelling vblank works is a bit rude, especially
> if said works do any resource management (eg. free memory).
> WARN if we ever hit this.
>
> TODO: Maybe drm_crtc_vblank_off() should wait for any
> pending work to reach its target vblank before actually
> doing anything drastic?
>
> Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude at redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c
> index bd481fdd6b87..43cd5c0f4f6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank_work.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ void drm_vblank_cancel_pending_works(struct drm_vblank_crtc *vblank)
>
> assert_spin_locked(&vblank->dev->event_lock);
>
> + drm_WARN_ONCE(vblank->dev, !list_empty(&vblank->pending_work),
> + "Cancelling pending vblank works!\n");
> +
> list_for_each_entry_safe(work, next, &vblank->pending_work, node) {
> list_del_init(&work->node);
> drm_vblank_put(vblank->dev, vblank->pipe);
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list