✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm: ensure drm headers are self-contained and pass kernel-doc

[Patchwork]

== Series Details ==

Series: drm: ensure drm headers are self-contained and pass kernel-doc
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/131943/
State : warning

== Summary ==

+ KERNEL=/kernel
+ git clone https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools mt
Cloning into 'mt'...
warning: redirecting to https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/maintainer-tools.git/
+ git -C mt rev-list -n1 origin/master
10b531c2aeb176a1a539b4a77216232f97719cec
+ cd /kernel
+ git config --global --add safe.directory /kernel
+ git log -n1
commit c3164ef7ea8a75e6ab7a9d1b9c25452dba386663
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
Date:   Tue Apr 2 17:01:36 2024 +0300

    drm: ensure drm headers are self-contained and pass kernel-doc
    
    Ensure drm headers build, are self-contained, have header guards, and
    have no kernel-doc warnings, when CONFIG_DRM_HEADER_TEST=y.
    
    The mechanism follows similar patters used in i915, xe, and usr/include.
    
    To cover include/drm, we need to recurse there using the top level
    Kbuild and the new include/Kbuild files.
    
    v2: make DRM_HEADER_TEST depend on DRM
    
    Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
    Cc: David Airlie <airlied at gmail.com>
    Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
    Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
    Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard at kernel.org>
    Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
    Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy at kernel.org>
    Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
    Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
+ /mt/dim checkpatch 5100fcc57dc5d45b246a0aeb068f4f8062d29b09 drm-intel
c3164ef7ea8a drm: ensure drm headers are self-contained and pass kernel-doc
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "scripts/spdxcheck.py", line 6, in <module>
    from ply import lex, yacc
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'ply'
-:82: WARNING:FILE_PATH_CHANGES: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#82: 
new file mode 100644

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 58 lines checked