Re: ✗ CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/guc: Use drm_device-managed version of mutex_init()

[Michal Wajdeczko]

On 06.04.2024 17:29, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/xe/guc: Use drm_device-managed version of mutex_init()
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/132118/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> CI Bug Log - changes from xe-1050-1bace689230323abe9cd3dfc6dd011fa5f9e6a05_BAT -> xe-pw-132118v1_BAT
> ====================================================
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
>   **FAILURE**
> 
>   Serious unknown changes coming with xe-pw-132118v1_BAT absolutely need to be
>   verified manually.
>   
>   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
>   introduced in xe-pw-132118v1_BAT, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra at lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
>   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
> 
>   
> 
> Participating hosts (5 -> 5)
> ------------------------------
> 
>   No changes in participating hosts
> 
> Possible new issues
> -------------------
> 
>   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in xe-pw-132118v1_BAT:
> 
> ### IGT changes ###
> 
> #### Possible regressions ####

CI.FULL (no e-mail, dunno why) also reports some regression, but
reported GPF call stack points to xe_devcoredump_free() so it's unrelated

> 
>   * igt at xe_exec_compute_mode@twice-bindexecqueue-userptr-rebind:
>     - bat-pvc-2:          [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>    [1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-1050-1bace689230323abe9cd3dfc6dd011fa5f9e6a05/bat-pvc-2/igt@xe_exec_compute_mode@twice-bindexecqueue-userptr-rebind.html
>    [2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-132118v1/bat-pvc-2/igt@xe_exec_compute_mode@twice-bindexecqueue-userptr-rebind.html

also seems unrelated as series is touching cleanup phase that is common
to all platforms, not just PVC

> 
>   
> #### Suppressed ####
> 
>   The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
>   They do not affect the overall result.
> 
>   * igt at kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank at c-edp1:
>     - {bat-lnl-1}:        [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] +1 other test fail
>    [3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-1050-1bace689230323abe9cd3dfc6dd011fa5f9e6a05/bat-lnl-1/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank@c-edp1.html
>    [4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-132118v1/bat-lnl-1/igt@kms_flip@basic-flip-vs-wf_vblank@c-edp1.html
> 
>   
>   {name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
>           the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
> 
> 
> 
> Build changes
> -------------
> 
>   * Linux: xe-1050-1bace689230323abe9cd3dfc6dd011fa5f9e6a05 -> xe-pw-132118v1
> 
>   IGT_7801: 7801
>   xe-1050-1bace689230323abe9cd3dfc6dd011fa5f9e6a05: 1bace689230323abe9cd3dfc6dd011fa5f9e6a05
>   xe-pw-132118v1: 132118v1
> 
> == Logs ==
> 
> For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/xe-pw-132118v1/index.html
>