[PATCH v3 06/11] drm/xe/xe2hpg: Determine flat ccs offset for vram

Balasubramani Vivekanandan balasubramani.vivekanandan at intel.com
Mon Apr 8 17:05:40 UTC 2024


From: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>

on Xe2 dgfx platform determine the offset using Flat CCS size
bitfield of XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_[UPPER/LOWER] mcr registers.

Bspec: 68023

v2: function argument tile_size changed from pass by reference to pass
by value

Signed-off-by: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Akshata Jahagirdar <akshata.jahagirdar at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h |  5 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c         | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
index 6617c86a096b..d404f211bc36 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/regs/xe_gt_regs.h
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
 
 #define XEHP_TILE_ADDR_RANGE(_idx)		XE_REG_MCR(0x4900 + (_idx) * 4)
 #define XEHP_FLAT_CCS_BASE_ADDR			XE_REG_MCR(0x4910)
+#define XEHP_FLAT_CCS_PTR			REG_GENMASK(31, 8)
 
 #define WM_CHICKEN3				XE_REG_MCR(0x5588, XE_REG_OPTION_MASKED)
 #define   HIZ_PLANE_COMPRESSION_DIS		REG_BIT(10)
@@ -142,6 +143,10 @@
 
 #define XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_LOWER		XE_REG_MCR(0x8800)
 #define   XE2_FLAT_CCS_ENABLE			REG_BIT(0)
+#define XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_LOWER_ADDR_MASK	REG_GENMASK(31, 6)
+
+#define XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_UPPER		XE_REG_MCR(0x8804)
+#define XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_UPPER_ADDR_MASK	REG_GENMASK(7, 0)
 
 #define GSCPSMI_BASE				XE_REG(0x880c)
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
index 5d13fc7cb9d2..d66da1a9f165 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_mmio.c
@@ -163,6 +163,42 @@ static int xe_determine_lmem_bar_size(struct xe_device *xe)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static inline u64 get_flat_ccs_offset(struct xe_gt *gt, u64 tile_size)
+{
+	struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
+	u64 offset;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	if (GRAPHICS_VER(xe) >= 20) {
+		u64 ccs_size = tile_size / 512;
+		u64 offset_hi, offset_lo;
+		u32 nodes, num_enabled;
+
+		reg = xe_mmio_read32(gt, MIRROR_FUSE3);
+		nodes = REG_FIELD_GET(XE2_NODE_ENABLE_MASK, reg);
+		num_enabled = hweight32(nodes); /* Number of enabled l3 nodes */
+
+		reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_LOWER);
+		offset_lo = REG_FIELD_GET(XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_LOWER_ADDR_MASK, reg);
+
+		reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_RANGE_UPPER);
+		offset_hi = REG_FIELD_GET(XE2_FLAT_CCS_BASE_UPPER_ADDR_MASK, reg);
+
+		offset = offset_hi << 32; /* HW view bits 39:32 */
+		offset |= offset_lo << 6; /* HW view bits 31:6 */
+		offset *= num_enabled; /* convert to SW view */
+
+		/* We don't expect any holes */
+		xe_assert_msg(xe, offset == (xe_mmio_read64_2x32(gt, GSMBASE) - ccs_size),
+			      "Hole between CCS and GSM.\n");
+	} else {
+		reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XEHP_FLAT_CCS_BASE_ADDR);
+		offset = (u64)REG_FIELD_GET(XEHP_FLAT_CCS_PTR, reg) * SZ_64K;
+	}
+
+	return offset;
+}
+
 /**
  * xe_mmio_tile_vram_size() - Collect vram size and offset information
  * @tile: tile to get info for
@@ -207,8 +243,7 @@ static int xe_mmio_tile_vram_size(struct xe_tile *tile, u64 *vram_size,
 
 	/* minus device usage */
 	if (xe->info.has_flat_ccs) {
-		reg = xe_gt_mcr_unicast_read_any(gt, XEHP_FLAT_CCS_BASE_ADDR);
-		offset = (u64)REG_FIELD_GET(GENMASK(31, 8), reg) * SZ_64K;
+		offset = get_flat_ccs_offset(gt, *tile_size);
 	} else {
 		offset = xe_mmio_read64_2x32(gt, GSMBASE);
 	}
-- 
2.25.1



More information about the Intel-xe mailing list