[PATCH 7/7] drm/xe/oa: Allow only certain property changes from config
Cavitt, Jonathan
jonathan.cavitt at intel.com
Tue Aug 20 14:15:51 UTC 2024
-----Original Message-----
From: Dixit, Ashutosh <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2024 5:58 PM
To: intel-xe at lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Brost, Matthew <matthew.brost at intel.com>; Souza, Jose <jose.souza at intel.com>; Landwerlin, Lionel G <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>; Nerlige Ramappa, Umesh <umesh.nerlige.ramappa at intel.com>; Cavitt, Jonathan <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] drm/xe/oa: Allow only certain property changes from config
>
> Whereas all properties can be specified during OA stream open, when the OA
> stream is reconfigured only the config_id and syncs can be specified.
>
> v2: Use separate function table for reconfig case (Jonathan)
> Change bool function args to enum (Matt B)
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
Minor nits below, but otherwise LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> index f43767e0a75ec..96420c3ea10fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_oa.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,11 @@ enum xe_oa_submit_deps {
> XE_OA_SUBMIT_ADD_DEPS,
> };
>
> +enum xe_oa_user_extn_from {
> + XE_OA_USER_EXTN_FROM_OPEN,
> + XE_OA_USER_EXTN_FROM_CONFIG,
> +};
> +
> struct xe_oa_reg {
> struct xe_reg addr;
> u32 value;
> @@ -1246,6 +1251,12 @@ static int xe_oa_set_prop_syncs_user(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 value,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 value,
> + struct xe_oa_open_param *param)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> typedef int (*xe_oa_set_property_fn)(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 value,
> struct xe_oa_open_param *param);
> static const xe_oa_set_property_fn xe_oa_set_property_funcs[] = {
Perhaps we should consider renaming this to match the later funcs array.
"xe_oa_set_property_funcs_open" for example?
Just a suggestion, not blocking.
> @@ -1262,8 +1273,22 @@ static const xe_oa_set_property_fn xe_oa_set_property_funcs[] = {
> [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_SYNCS] = xe_oa_set_prop_syncs_user,
> };
>
> -static int xe_oa_user_ext_set_property(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 extension,
> - struct xe_oa_open_param *param)
> +static const xe_oa_set_property_fn xe_oa_set_property_funcs_config[] = {
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_UNIT_ID] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_SAMPLE_OA] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_METRIC_SET] = xe_oa_set_prop_metric_set,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_FORMAT] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_PERIOD_EXPONENT] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_DISABLED] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_EXEC_QUEUE_ID] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_OA_ENGINE_INSTANCE] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_NO_PREEMPT] = xe_oa_set_prop_ret_inval,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_NUM_SYNCS] = xe_oa_set_prop_num_syncs,
> + [DRM_XE_OA_PROPERTY_SYNCS] = xe_oa_set_prop_syncs_user,
> +};
> +
> +static int xe_oa_user_ext_set_property(struct xe_oa *oa, enum xe_oa_user_extn_from from,
> + u64 extension, struct xe_oa_open_param *param)
> {
> u64 __user *address = u64_to_user_ptr(extension);
> struct drm_xe_ext_set_property ext;
> @@ -1279,18 +1304,22 @@ static int xe_oa_user_ext_set_property(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 extension,
> return -EINVAL;
>
> idx = array_index_nospec(ext.property, ARRAY_SIZE(xe_oa_set_property_funcs));
> - return xe_oa_set_property_funcs[idx](oa, ext.value, param);
> +
> + if (from == XE_OA_USER_EXTN_FROM_CONFIG)
> + return xe_oa_set_property_funcs_config[idx](oa, ext.value, param);
> + else
> + return xe_oa_set_property_funcs[idx](oa, ext.value, param);
If we want to extend this in the future, we might want a map between the
xe_oa_user_extn_from enum and the xe_oa_set_property_funcs_config.
Something like:
"""
static const xe_oa_set_property_fn xe_oa_set_property_funcs_list[][] {
[XE_OA_USER_EXTN_FROM_OPEN] = xe_oa_set_property_funcs,
[XE_OA_USER_EXTN_FROM_CONFIG] = xe_oa_set_property_funcs_config,
};
"""
Then, here, we'd just need to do something like:
"""
return xe_oa_set_property_funcs_list[from][idx](oa, ext.value, param);
"""
I don't think this is strictly necessary, though.
-Jonathan Cavitt
> }
>
> -typedef int (*xe_oa_user_extension_fn)(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 extension,
> - struct xe_oa_open_param *param);
> +typedef int (*xe_oa_user_extension_fn)(struct xe_oa *oa, enum xe_oa_user_extn_from from,
> + u64 extension, struct xe_oa_open_param *param);
> static const xe_oa_user_extension_fn xe_oa_user_extension_funcs[] = {
> [DRM_XE_OA_EXTENSION_SET_PROPERTY] = xe_oa_user_ext_set_property,
> };
>
> #define MAX_USER_EXTENSIONS 16
> -static int xe_oa_user_extensions(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 extension, int ext_number,
> - struct xe_oa_open_param *param)
> +static int xe_oa_user_extensions(struct xe_oa *oa, enum xe_oa_user_extn_from from, u64 extension,
> + int ext_number, struct xe_oa_open_param *param)
> {
> u64 __user *address = u64_to_user_ptr(extension);
> struct drm_xe_user_extension ext;
> @@ -1309,12 +1338,12 @@ static int xe_oa_user_extensions(struct xe_oa *oa, u64 extension, int ext_number
> return -EINVAL;
>
> idx = array_index_nospec(ext.name, ARRAY_SIZE(xe_oa_user_extension_funcs));
> - err = xe_oa_user_extension_funcs[idx](oa, extension, param);
> + err = xe_oa_user_extension_funcs[idx](oa, from, extension, param);
> if (XE_IOCTL_DBG(oa->xe, err))
> return err;
>
> if (ext.next_extension)
> - return xe_oa_user_extensions(oa, ext.next_extension, ++ext_number, param);
> + return xe_oa_user_extensions(oa, from, ext.next_extension, ++ext_number, param);
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1460,7 +1489,7 @@ static long xe_oa_config_locked(struct xe_oa_stream *stream, u64 arg)
> struct xe_oa_config *config;
> int err;
>
> - err = xe_oa_user_extensions(stream->oa, arg, 0, ¶m);
> + err = xe_oa_user_extensions(stream->oa, XE_OA_USER_EXTN_FROM_CONFIG, arg, 0, ¶m);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> @@ -2011,7 +2040,7 @@ int xe_oa_stream_open_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, u64 data, struct drm_file *f
> }
>
> param.xef = xef;
> - ret = xe_oa_user_extensions(oa, data, 0, ¶m);
> + ret = xe_oa_user_extensions(oa, XE_OA_USER_EXTN_FROM_OPEN, data, 0, ¶m);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list