[PATCH] Revert "drm/xe/devcoredump: Add ASCII85 dump helper function"

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Fri Dec 13 15:18:07 UTC 2024


On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 09:10:05AM -0600, Jose Souza wrote:
>On Fri, 2024-12-13 at 08:38 -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 09:12:52AM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> > We do not break userspace.
>
>There is other patch that also breaks Mesa parser:
>
>drm/xe/devcoredump: Improve section headings and add tile info

isn't that the item (b) below? At least it what I meant it to be looking
at the regression discussion in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ca2978d748368f37e0fd29fd65b059c52b1b755f.camel@intel.com/

Lucas De Marchi

>
>> >
>> > This reverts commit ec1455ce7e35a31289d2dbc1070b980538698921.
>>
>> But we have users calling this function.... the revert is not so simple.
>> I think we need to revert the functionality rather than reverting all
>> the patches, otherwise it will cause a lot of headaches.
>>
>> I propose we go with:
>>
>> a) drop the \n that broke mesa and merge that with cc stable.
>>
>> b) move back the entry to the previous section that broke mesa and cc
>>     stable.
>>
>>     José, would it be ok to merge a patch in mesa and port that
>>     to mesa stable that simply looks at 2 possible sections? Or even
>>     drop the section checks... ?
>>
>> c) settle on one of the possible solutions for \n that were presented in
>>     this discussion.  I think the sanest one is that a space in the end of a
>>     line printing ascii85 would signify a continuation marker.  But merging
>>     (a) means we have time to discuss and adjust if needed.
>>
>> After the dust settles we may think of a better way to evolve the
>> devcoredump format so it doesn't cause breakages in future updates.
>>
>> Lucas De Marchi
>


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list