[PATCH] Revert "drm/xe: Force write completion of MI_STORE_DATA_IMM"
Dixit, Ashutosh
ashutosh.dixit at intel.com
Fri Dec 27 17:26:47 UTC 2024
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 06:24:22 -0800, Souza, Jose wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2024-12-26 at 19:31 -0800, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Dec 2024 08:23:10 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
> > >
> > > This reverts commit 1460bb1fef9ccf7390af0d74a15252442fd6effd.
> > >
> > > In all places the MI_STORE_DATA_IMM are not followed by a read of
> > > the same memory address in the same batch buffer and the posted writes
> > > are flushed with PIPE_CONTROL or MI_FLUSH_DW in xe_ring_ops.c functions
> > > so there is no need to set this register.
> >
> > As I was saying this commit message should just be:
> >
> > In all places where MI_STORE_DATA_IMM is used, posted writes are flushed
> > with PIPE_CONTROL or MI_FLUSH_DW in xe_ring_ops.c functions, so there is no
> > need to set this register.
> >
> > So according to me the "are not followed by a read of the same memory
> > address in the same batch buffer" is incorrect, it will work even without
> > setting the flag.
>
> Not on Xe2+, with CS_PRIORITY_MEM_READ set there is a priority path to
> memory for reads and other for writes.
OK, in that case please go ahead and merge.
>
> >
> > Anyway apart from that nit, this is:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> >
> > >
> > > Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit at intel.com>
> > > Fixes: 1460bb1fef9c ("drm/xe: Force write completion of MI_STORE_DATA_IMM")
> > > Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_mi_commands.h | 13 ++++++-------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 11 +++--------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c | 6 ++----
> > > 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_mi_commands.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_mi_commands.h
> > > index f4ee910f09432..10ec2920d31b3 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_mi_commands.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/instructions/xe_mi_commands.h
> > > @@ -33,13 +33,12 @@
> > > #define MI_TOPOLOGY_FILTER __MI_INSTR(0xD)
> > > #define MI_FORCE_WAKEUP __MI_INSTR(0x1D)
> > >
> > > -#define MI_STORE_DATA_IMM __MI_INSTR(0x20)
> > > -#define MI_SDI_GGTT REG_BIT(22)
> > > -#define MI_FORCE_WRITE_COMPLETION_CHECK REG_BIT(10)
> > > -#define MI_SDI_LEN_DW GENMASK(9, 0)
> > > -#define MI_SDI_NUM_DW(x) REG_FIELD_PREP(MI_SDI_LEN_DW, (x) + 3 - 2)
> > > -#define MI_SDI_NUM_QW(x) (REG_FIELD_PREP(MI_SDI_LEN_DW, 2 * (x) + 3 - 2) | \
> > > - REG_BIT(21))
> > > +#define MI_STORE_DATA_IMM __MI_INSTR(0x20)
> > > +#define MI_SDI_GGTT REG_BIT(22)
> > > +#define MI_SDI_LEN_DW GENMASK(9, 0)
> > > +#define MI_SDI_NUM_DW(x) REG_FIELD_PREP(MI_SDI_LEN_DW, (x) + 3 - 2)
> > > +#define MI_SDI_NUM_QW(x) (REG_FIELD_PREP(MI_SDI_LEN_DW, 2 * (x) + 3 - 2) | \
> > > + REG_BIT(21))
> > >
> > > #define MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM __MI_INSTR(0x22)
> > > #define MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO REG_BIT(19)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > > index 8b32fad678782..1b97d90aaddaf 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> > > @@ -581,9 +581,7 @@ static void emit_pte(struct xe_migrate *m,
> > > while (ptes) {
> > > u32 chunk = min(MAX_PTE_PER_SDI, ptes);
> > >
> > > - bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM |
> > > - MI_FORCE_WRITE_COMPLETION_CHECK |
> > > - MI_SDI_NUM_QW(chunk);
> > > + bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM | MI_SDI_NUM_QW(chunk);
> > > bb->cs[bb->len++] = ofs;
> > > bb->cs[bb->len++] = 0;
> > >
> > > @@ -1225,9 +1223,7 @@ static void write_pgtable(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_bb *bb, u64 ppgtt_ofs,
> > > if (!(bb->len & 1))
> > > bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_NOOP;
> > >
> > > - bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM |
> > > - MI_FORCE_WRITE_COMPLETION_CHECK |
> > > - MI_SDI_NUM_QW(chunk);
> > > + bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM | MI_SDI_NUM_QW(chunk);
> > > bb->cs[bb->len++] = lower_32_bits(addr);
> > > bb->cs[bb->len++] = upper_32_bits(addr);
> > > if (pt_op->bind)
> > > @@ -1392,8 +1388,7 @@ __xe_migrate_update_pgtables(struct xe_migrate *m,
> > > u32 idx = 0;
> > >
> > > bb->cs[bb->len++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM |
> > > - MI_FORCE_WRITE_COMPLETION_CHECK |
> > > - MI_SDI_NUM_QW(chunk);
> > > + MI_SDI_NUM_QW(chunk);
> > > bb->cs[bb->len++] = ofs;
> > > bb->cs[bb->len++] = 0; /* upper_32_bits */
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> > > index c8ab37fa0d198..9f327f27c0726 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ring_ops.c
> > > @@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ static int emit_user_interrupt(u32 *dw, int i)
> > >
> > > static int emit_store_imm_ggtt(u32 addr, u32 value, u32 *dw, int i)
> > > {
> > > - dw[i++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM | MI_SDI_GGTT |
> > > - MI_FORCE_WRITE_COMPLETION_CHECK | MI_SDI_NUM_DW(1);
> > > + dw[i++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM | MI_SDI_GGTT | MI_SDI_NUM_DW(1);
> > > dw[i++] = addr;
> > > dw[i++] = 0;
> > > dw[i++] = value;
> > > @@ -163,8 +162,7 @@ static int emit_pipe_invalidate(u32 mask_flags, bool invalidate_tlb, u32 *dw,
> > > static int emit_store_imm_ppgtt_posted(u64 addr, u64 value,
> > > u32 *dw, int i)
> > > {
> > > - dw[i++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM | MI_FORCE_WRITE_COMPLETION_CHECK |
> > > - MI_SDI_NUM_QW(1);
> > > + dw[i++] = MI_STORE_DATA_IMM | MI_SDI_NUM_QW(1);
> > > dw[i++] = lower_32_bits(addr);
> > > dw[i++] = upper_32_bits(addr);
> > > dw[i++] = lower_32_bits(value);
> > > --
> > > 2.47.1
> > >
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list