[PATCH] drm/xe: Map both mem.kernel_bb_pool and usm.bb_pool
Welty, Brian
brian.welty at intel.com
Fri Feb 2 19:05:27 UTC 2024
On 2/1/2024 7:34 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> For integrated devices we need to map both mem.kernel_bb_pool and
> usm.bb_pool to be able to run batches from both pools.
>
> Fixes: a682b6a42d4d ("drm/xe: Support device page faults on integrated platforms")
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
Thanks Matt.
I applied the fix Stuart pointed out and verified this resolves issue on
LNL with xe_exec_threads.
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Brian Welty <brian.welty at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c | 5 ++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 675a2927a19e..295cba1c688f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -456,7 +456,10 @@ static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
> * USM has its only SA pool to non-block behind user operations
> */
> if (gt_to_xe(gt)->info.has_usm) {
> - gt->usm.bb_pool = xe_sa_bo_manager_init(gt_to_tile(gt), SZ_1M, 16);
> + struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> +
> + gt->usm.bb_pool = xe_sa_bo_manager_init(gt_to_tile(gt),
> + IS_DGFX(xe) ? SZ_1M : SZ_512, 16);
> if (IS_ERR(gt->usm.bb_pool)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(gt->usm.bb_pool);
> goto err_force_wake;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> index 9ab004871f9a..7465f8d14028 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> @@ -180,11 +180,6 @@ static int xe_migrate_prepare_vm(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_migrate *m,
> if (!IS_DGFX(xe)) {
> /* Write out batch too */
> m->batch_base_ofs = NUM_PT_SLOTS * XE_PAGE_SIZE;
> - if (xe->info.has_usm) {
> - batch = tile->primary_gt->usm.bb_pool->bo;
> - m->usm_batch_base_ofs = m->batch_base_ofs;
> - }
> -
> for (i = 0; i < batch->size;
> i += vm->flags & XE_VM_FLAG_64K ? XE_64K_PAGE_SIZE :
> XE_PAGE_SIZE) {
> @@ -195,6 +190,24 @@ static int xe_migrate_prepare_vm(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_migrate *m,
> entry);
> level++;
> }
> + if (xe->info.has_usm) {
> + xe_tile_assert(tile, batch->size == SZ_1M);
> +
> + batch = tile->primary_gt->usm.bb_pool->bo;
> + m->usm_batch_base_ofs = m->batch_base_ofs + SZ_1M;
> + xe_tile_assert(tile, batch->size == SZ_512);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < batch->size;
> + i += vm->flags & XE_VM_FLAG_64K ? XE_64K_PAGE_SIZE :
> + XE_PAGE_SIZE) {
> + entry = vm->pt_ops->pte_encode_bo(batch, i,
> + pat_index, 0);
> +
> + xe_map_wr(xe, &bo->vmap, map_ofs + level * 8, u64,
> + entry);
> + level++;
> + }
> + }
> } else {
> u64 batch_addr = xe_bo_addr(batch, 0, XE_PAGE_SIZE);
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list