[PATCH] drm/xe: Map both mem.kernel_bb_pool and usm.bb_pool

Welty, Brian brian.welty at intel.com
Fri Feb 2 19:05:27 UTC 2024


On 2/1/2024 7:34 PM, Matthew Brost wrote:
> For integrated devices we need to map both mem.kernel_bb_pool and
> usm.bb_pool to be able to run batches from both pools.
> 
> Fixes: a682b6a42d4d ("drm/xe: Support device page faults on integrated platforms")
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>

Thanks Matt.
I applied the fix Stuart pointed out and verified this resolves issue on 
LNL with xe_exec_threads.

Reviewed-and-tested-by: Brian Welty <brian.welty at intel.com>


> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c      |  5 ++++-
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
>   2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> index 675a2927a19e..295cba1c688f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt.c
> @@ -456,7 +456,10 @@ static int all_fw_domain_init(struct xe_gt *gt)
>   		 * USM has its only SA pool to non-block behind user operations
>   		 */
>   		if (gt_to_xe(gt)->info.has_usm) {
> -			gt->usm.bb_pool = xe_sa_bo_manager_init(gt_to_tile(gt), SZ_1M, 16);
> +			struct xe_device *xe = gt_to_xe(gt);
> +
> +			gt->usm.bb_pool = xe_sa_bo_manager_init(gt_to_tile(gt),
> +								IS_DGFX(xe) ? SZ_1M : SZ_512, 16);
>   			if (IS_ERR(gt->usm.bb_pool)) {
>   				err = PTR_ERR(gt->usm.bb_pool);
>   				goto err_force_wake;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> index 9ab004871f9a..7465f8d14028 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_migrate.c
> @@ -180,11 +180,6 @@ static int xe_migrate_prepare_vm(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_migrate *m,
>   	if (!IS_DGFX(xe)) {
>   		/* Write out batch too */
>   		m->batch_base_ofs = NUM_PT_SLOTS * XE_PAGE_SIZE;
> -		if (xe->info.has_usm) {
> -			batch = tile->primary_gt->usm.bb_pool->bo;
> -			m->usm_batch_base_ofs = m->batch_base_ofs;
> -		}
> -
>   		for (i = 0; i < batch->size;
>   		     i += vm->flags & XE_VM_FLAG_64K ? XE_64K_PAGE_SIZE :
>   		     XE_PAGE_SIZE) {
> @@ -195,6 +190,24 @@ static int xe_migrate_prepare_vm(struct xe_tile *tile, struct xe_migrate *m,
>   				  entry);
>   			level++;
>   		}
> +		if (xe->info.has_usm) {
> +			xe_tile_assert(tile, batch->size == SZ_1M);
> +
> +			batch = tile->primary_gt->usm.bb_pool->bo;
> +			m->usm_batch_base_ofs = m->batch_base_ofs + SZ_1M;
> +			xe_tile_assert(tile, batch->size == SZ_512);
> +
> +			for (i = 0; i < batch->size;
> +			     i += vm->flags & XE_VM_FLAG_64K ? XE_64K_PAGE_SIZE :
> +			     XE_PAGE_SIZE) {
> +				entry = vm->pt_ops->pte_encode_bo(batch, i,
> +								  pat_index, 0);
> +
> +				xe_map_wr(xe, &bo->vmap, map_ofs + level * 8, u64,
> +					  entry);
> +				level++;
> +			}
> +		}
>   	} else {
>   		u64 batch_addr = xe_bo_addr(batch, 0, XE_PAGE_SIZE);
>   


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list