[RFC 21/34] drm/xe: Convert GuC CT paths from mem_access to xe_pm_runtime

Matthew Auld matthew.auld at intel.com
Mon Feb 5 12:23:41 UTC 2024


On 26/01/2024 20:30, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> For the G2H and TLB invalidation cases, the outer bounds
> protection of the pm_runtime are not going to work. So
> we need to have the inner side protections here.
> 
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
> Suggested-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c      |  3 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c       | 79 +++++++++++++---------------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h |  2 +
>   3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> index 8abdf3c17e1d..b3669eac23c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c
> @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ static int info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>   			   xe_force_wake_ref(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT));
>   		drm_printf(&p, "gt%d engine_mask 0x%llx\n", id,
>   			   gt->info.engine_mask);
> +		drm_printf(&p, "gt%d g2h_outstanding %d g2h_pm_refs %d\n", id,
> +			   gt->uc.guc.ct.g2h_outstanding,
> +			   gt->uc.guc.ct.g2h_pm_refs);
>   	}
>   
>   	xe_pm_runtime_put(xe);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> index f3d356383ced..139cfe733661 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c
> @@ -287,16 +287,49 @@ static int guc_ct_control_toggle(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, bool enable)
>   	return ret > 0 ? -EPROTO : ret;
>   }
>   
> +static void guc_ct_g2h_outstanding_clear(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ct->g2h_pm_refs; i++)
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
> +	ct->g2h_outstanding = 0;
> +	ct->g2h_pm_refs = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void guc_ct_g2h_outstanding_dec(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
> +{
> +	if (ct->g2h_pm_refs > 0)
> +		xe_pm_runtime_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
> +	ct->g2h_pm_refs--;
> +	ct->g2h_outstanding--;
> +}
> +
> +static void guc_ct_g2h_outstanding_add(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, int num_g2h)
> +{
> +	struct xe_device *xe = ct_to_xe(ct);
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < num_g2h; i++) {
> +		if (xe_pm_runtime_get_if_in_use(xe))
> +			ct->g2h_pm_refs++;
> +		else
> +			drm_err(&xe->drm, "Failed to grab RPM ref for outstanding g2h\n");
> +	}

I guess we could maybe drop the g2h_pm_refs, and rather just track 
single rpm ref for entire ct when g2h_outstanding 0 -> 1, and likewise 
drop the rpm ref when g2h_outstanding reaches zero?

> +	ct->g2h_outstanding += num_g2h;
> +}
> +
>   static void xe_guc_ct_set_state(struct xe_guc_ct *ct,
>   				enum xe_guc_ct_state state)
>   {
>   	mutex_lock(&ct->lock);		/* Serialise dequeue_one_g2h() */
>   	spin_lock_irq(&ct->fast_lock);	/* Serialise CT fast-path */
>   
> +
>   	xe_gt_assert(ct_to_gt(ct), ct->g2h_outstanding == 0 ||
>   		     state == XE_GUC_CT_STATE_STOPPED);
>   
> -	ct->g2h_outstanding = 0;
> +	guc_ct_g2h_outstanding_clear(ct);
>   	ct->state = state;
>   
>   	spin_unlock_irq(&ct->fast_lock);
> @@ -428,7 +461,7 @@ static void __g2h_reserve_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len, u32 num_g2h)
>   		lockdep_assert_held(&ct->fast_lock);
>   
>   		ct->ctbs.g2h.info.space -= g2h_len;
> -		ct->g2h_outstanding += num_g2h;
> +		guc_ct_g2h_outstanding_add(ct, num_g2h);
>   	}
>   }
>   
> @@ -439,7 +472,7 @@ static void __g2h_release_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len)
>   		  ct->ctbs.g2h.info.size - ct->ctbs.g2h.info.resv_space);
>   
>   	ct->ctbs.g2h.info.space += g2h_len;
> -	--ct->g2h_outstanding;
> +	guc_ct_g2h_outstanding_dec(ct);
>   }
>   
>   static void g2h_release_space(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 g2h_len)
> @@ -1199,14 +1232,8 @@ static void g2h_fast_path(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, u32 *msg, u32 len)
>    */
>   void xe_guc_ct_fast_path(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
>   {
> -	struct xe_device *xe = ct_to_xe(ct);
> -	bool ongoing;
>   	int len;
>   
> -	ongoing = xe_device_mem_access_get_if_ongoing(ct_to_xe(ct));
> -	if (!ongoing && xe_pm_read_callback_task(ct_to_xe(ct)) == NULL)
> -		return;
> -
>   	spin_lock(&ct->fast_lock);
>   	do {
>   		len = g2h_read(ct, ct->fast_msg, true);
> @@ -1214,9 +1241,6 @@ void xe_guc_ct_fast_path(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
>   			g2h_fast_path(ct, ct->fast_msg, len);
>   	} while (len > 0);
>   	spin_unlock(&ct->fast_lock);
> -
> -	if (ongoing)
> -		xe_device_mem_access_put(xe);
>   }
>   
>   /* Returns less than zero on error, 0 on done, 1 on more available */
> @@ -1247,36 +1271,8 @@ static int dequeue_one_g2h(struct xe_guc_ct *ct)
>   static void g2h_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
>   {
>   	struct xe_guc_ct *ct = container_of(w, struct xe_guc_ct, g2h_worker);
> -	bool ongoing;
>   	int ret;
>   
> -	/*
> -	 * Normal users must always hold mem_access.ref around CT calls. However
> -	 * during the runtime pm callbacks we rely on CT to talk to the GuC, but
> -	 * at this stage we can't rely on mem_access.ref and even the
> -	 * callback_task will be different than current.  For such cases we just
> -	 * need to ensure we always process the responses from any blocking
> -	 * ct_send requests or where we otherwise expect some response when
> -	 * initiated from those callbacks (which will need to wait for the below
> -	 * dequeue_one_g2h()).  The dequeue_one_g2h() will gracefully fail if
> -	 * the device has suspended to the point that the CT communication has
> -	 * been disabled.
> -	 *
> -	 * If we are inside the runtime pm callback, we can be the only task
> -	 * still issuing CT requests (since that requires having the
> -	 * mem_access.ref).  It seems like it might in theory be possible to
> -	 * receive unsolicited events from the GuC just as we are
> -	 * suspending-resuming, but those will currently anyway be lost when
> -	 * eventually exiting from suspend, hence no need to wake up the device
> -	 * here. If we ever need something stronger than get_if_ongoing() then
> -	 * we need to be careful with blocking the pm callbacks from getting CT
> -	 * responses, if the worker here is blocked on those callbacks
> -	 * completing, creating a deadlock.
> -	 */
> -	ongoing = xe_device_mem_access_get_if_ongoing(ct_to_xe(ct));
> -	if (!ongoing && xe_pm_read_callback_task(ct_to_xe(ct)) == NULL)
> -		return;
> -
>   	do {
>   		mutex_lock(&ct->lock);
>   		ret = dequeue_one_g2h(ct);
> @@ -1290,9 +1286,6 @@ static void g2h_worker_func(struct work_struct *w)
>   			kick_reset(ct);
>   		}
>   	} while (ret == 1);
> -
> -	if (ongoing)
> -		xe_device_mem_access_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
>   }
>   
>   static void guc_ctb_snapshot_capture(struct xe_device *xe, struct guc_ctb *ctb,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h
> index d29144c9f20b..4220230e7be4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct_types.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ struct xe_guc_ct {
>   	} ctbs;
>   	/** @g2h_outstanding: number of outstanding G2H */
>   	u32 g2h_outstanding;
> +	/** @g2h_pm_refs: number of pm_refs for pending G2H */
> +	u32 g2h_pm_refs;
>   	/** @g2h_worker: worker to process G2H messages */
>   	struct work_struct g2h_worker;
>   	/** @state: CT state */


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list