[PATCH 1/6] drm/tests/drm_buddy: fix 32b build
Matthew Auld
matthew.auld at intel.com
Mon Feb 19 10:28:08 UTC 2024
On 19/02/2024 09:53, Christian König wrote:
> Am 19.02.24 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:
>> On 15/02/2024 17:44, Matthew Auld wrote:
>>> Doesn't seem to compile on 32b, presumably due to u64 mod/division.
>>> Simplest is to just switch over to u32 here. Also make print modifiers
>>> consistent with that.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a64056bb5a32 ("drm/tests/drm_buddy: add alloc_contiguous test")
>>> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert at linux-m68k.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com>
>>> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard at redhat.com>
>>
>> Any chance someone can push just this single patch here, since it
>> fixes 32b build? It already has an r-b from Arun.
>
> Already working on this. Just give me a few more minutes.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
>>> index fee6bec757d1..edacc1adb28f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_buddy_test.c
>>> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ static inline u64 get_size(int order, u64 chunk_size)
>>> static void drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
>>> {
>>> - u64 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
>>> + u32 mm_size, ps = SZ_4K, i, n_pages, total;
>>> struct drm_buddy_block *block;
>>> struct drm_buddy mm;
>>> LIST_HEAD(left);
>>> @@ -56,30 +56,30 @@ static void
>>> drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
>>> KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test,
>>> drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0, mm_size,
>>> ps, ps, list, 0),
>>> - "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n",
>>> + "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n",
>>> ps);
>>> } while (++i < n_pages);
>>> KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0,
>>> mm_size,
>>> 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
>>> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
>>> - "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
>>> + "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
>>> drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &middle);
>>> KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0,
>>> mm_size,
>>> 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
>>> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
>>> - "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
>>> + "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
>>> KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0,
>>> mm_size,
>>> 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
>>> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
>>> - "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 2 * ps);
>>> + "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
>>> drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &right);
>>> KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0,
>>> mm_size,
>>> 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
>>> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
>>> - "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%llu\n", 3 * ps);
>>> + "buddy_alloc didn't error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
>>> /*
>>> * At this point we should have enough contiguous space for 2
>>> blocks,
>>> * however they are never buddies (since we freed middle and
>>> right) so
>>> @@ -88,13 +88,13 @@ static void
>>> drm_test_buddy_alloc_contiguous(struct kunit *test)
>>> KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0,
>>> mm_size,
>>> 2 * ps, ps, &allocated,
>>> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
>>> - "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 2 * ps);
>>> + "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 2 * ps);
>>> drm_buddy_free_list(&mm, &left);
>>> KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, drm_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, 0,
>>> mm_size,
>>> 3 * ps, ps, &allocated,
>>> DRM_BUDDY_CONTIGUOUS_ALLOCATION),
>>> - "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%d\n", 3 * ps);
>>> + "buddy_alloc hit an error size=%u\n", 3 * ps);
>>> total = 0;
>>> list_for_each_entry(block, &allocated, link)
>
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list