[PATCH v4 3/8] drm/xe/uapi: Add configs for Engine busyness
Riana Tauro
riana.tauro at intel.com
Wed Jan 3 07:08:57 UTC 2024
On 1/3/2024 12:36 PM, Riana Tauro wrote:
>
>
> On 1/3/2024 12:32 PM, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
>>
>> On 1/3/24 12:10, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Aravind
>>>
>>> On 1/3/2024 10:56 AM, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 12/22/23 13:15, Riana Tauro wrote:
>>>>> GuC provides engine busyness ticks as a 64 bit counter which count
>>>>> as clock ticks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Add configs to the uapi to expose Engine busyness via PMU.
>>>>>
>>>>> v2: add "__" prefix for internal helpers
>>>>> add a simple helper for application usage (Aravind)
>>>>>
>>>>> v3: rebase
>>>>> change internal uapi pmu config helpers (Umesh)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cc: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty at linux.intel.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro at intel.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h | 41
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>>>>> index 9fa3ae324731..f8456cda5cda 100644
>>>>> --- a/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>>>>> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/xe_drm.h
>>>>> @@ -1340,6 +1340,47 @@ struct drm_xe_wait_user_fence {
>>>>> __u64 reserved[2];
>>>>> };
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * DOC: XE PMU event config IDs
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + * Check 'man perf_event_open' to use the ID's DRM_XE_PMU_XXXX
>>>>> listed in xe_drm.h
>>>>> + * in 'struct perf_event_attr' as part of perf_event_open syscall
>>>>> to read a
>>>>> + * particular event.
>>>>> + *
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/**
>>>>> + * enum drm_xe_pmu_engine_sample - Supported PMU engine samples
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +enum drm_xe_pmu_engine_sample {
>>>>> + /** @DRM_XE_PMU_SAMPLE_BUSY_TICKS: Engine busy ticks */
>>>>> + DRM_XE_PMU_SAMPLE_BUSY_TICKS = 0,
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> +/*
>>>>> + * Top bits of every counter are GT id.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> +#define __DRM_XE_PMU_GT_SHIFT (56)
>>>>> +#define __DRM_XE_PMU_SAMPLE_BITS (4)
>>>>> +#define __DRM_XE_PMU_SAMPLE_INSTANCE_BITS (8)
>>>>> +#define __DRM_XE_PMU_CLASS_SHIFT \
>>>>> + (__DRM_XE_PMU_SAMPLE_BITS + __DRM_XE_PMU_SAMPLE_INSTANCE_BITS)
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define __DRM_XE_PMU_GT_EVENT(gt, x) \
>>>>> + (((__u64)(x)) | ((__u64)(gt) << __DRM_XE_PMU_GT_SHIFT))
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define __DRM_XE_PMU_ENGINE(class, instance, sample) \
>>>>> + (((class) << __DRM_XE_PMU_CLASS_SHIFT | \
>>>>> + (instance) << __DRM_XE_PMU_SAMPLE_BITS | \
>>>>> + (sample)))
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define __DRM_XE_PMU_OTHER(gt, x) \
>>>>> + (__DRM_XE_PMU_GT_EVENT(gt, 0xfffff) + 1 + (x))
>>>> Use __DRM_XE_PMU_ENGINE(0xff, 0xff, 0xf) instead of 0xfffff so that
>>>> it will be clear
>>>> that it is starting after the engine event.
>>> Previous comments from Umesh suggested to use 0xfffff so changed it
>>> from rev3.
>> looking back at the comment, Umesh corrected it to be 0xfffff, so
>> using as suggested by me above
>> looks to be more apt.
> Initially Group busyness took the first few configs, so i had added a
> different offset.
>
> Anyway ___DRM_XE_PMU_GT_EVENT(gt, 0xfffff) is same as
> __DRM_XE_PMU_ENGINE_EVENT(0xff, 0xff, 0xf). So will change it as you
> suggested.
>
0xfffff is same as __DRM_XE_PMU_ENGINE_EVENT(0xff, 0xff, 0xf).
So will add it as
___DRM_XE_PMU_GT_EVENT(gt, __DRM_XE_PMU_ENGINE_EVENT(0xff, 0xff, 0xf))
>>>>
>>>> But __DRM_XE_PMU_OTHER is not used any where so why to introduce in
>>>> this patch.
>>> I added it here so that it can be used in the next patch to check if
>>> its engine event.
>>>
>>> Will move total active ticks config also to the same patch so that
>>> all configs are in one patch.
>>
>> then you should define __DRM_XE_PMU_OTHER where active ticks is being
>> introduced not viceversa.Okay will move it to the total active ticks
>> patch.
>
> Thanks
> Riana
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Aravind.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Riana
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Aravind.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +#define DRM_XE_PMU_ENGINE_BUSY_TICKS(gt, class, instance) \
>>>>> + __DRM_XE_PMU_GT_EVENT(gt, __DRM_XE_PMU_ENGINE(class, instance, \
>>>>> + DRM_XE_PMU_SAMPLE_BUSY_TICKS))
>>>>> +
>>>>> #if defined(__cplusplus)
>>>>> }
>>>>> #endif
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list