[PATCH] drm/xe: Fix a build error
Oak Zeng
oak.zeng at intel.com
Sat Jan 27 15:53:27 UTC 2024
This fixes a build failure on drm-tip. This issue was introduced during
merge of "drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6". For some
reason, the xe_bo.c part of above change is not merged. Manually merge
the missing part to drm_tip
Signed-off-by: Oak Zeng <oak.zeng at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c | 33 +++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
index 686d716c5581..d6a193060cc0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c
@@ -38,22 +38,26 @@ static const struct ttm_place sys_placement_flags = {
static struct ttm_placement sys_placement = {
.num_placement = 1,
.placement = &sys_placement_flags,
- .num_busy_placement = 1,
- .busy_placement = &sys_placement_flags,
};
-static const struct ttm_place tt_placement_flags = {
- .fpfn = 0,
- .lpfn = 0,
- .mem_type = XE_PL_TT,
- .flags = 0,
+static const struct ttm_place tt_placement_flags[] = {
+ {
+ .fpfn = 0,
+ .lpfn = 0,
+ .mem_type = XE_PL_TT,
+ .flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_DESIRED,
+ },
+ {
+ .fpfn = 0,
+ .lpfn = 0,
+ .mem_type = XE_PL_SYSTEM,
+ .flags = TTM_PL_FLAG_FALLBACK,
+ }
};
static struct ttm_placement tt_placement = {
- .num_placement = 1,
- .placement = &tt_placement_flags,
- .num_busy_placement = 1,
- .busy_placement = &sys_placement_flags,
+ .num_placement = 2,
+ .placement = tt_placement_flags,
};
bool mem_type_is_vram(u32 mem_type)
@@ -230,8 +234,6 @@ static int __xe_bo_placement_for_flags(struct xe_device *xe, struct xe_bo *bo,
bo->placement = (struct ttm_placement) {
.num_placement = c,
.placement = bo->placements,
- .num_busy_placement = c,
- .busy_placement = bo->placements,
};
return 0;
@@ -251,7 +253,6 @@ static void xe_evict_flags(struct ttm_buffer_object *tbo,
/* Don't handle scatter gather BOs */
if (tbo->type == ttm_bo_type_sg) {
placement->num_placement = 0;
- placement->num_busy_placement = 0;
return;
}
@@ -1391,8 +1392,6 @@ static int __xe_bo_fixed_placement(struct xe_device *xe,
bo->placement = (struct ttm_placement) {
.num_placement = 1,
.placement = place,
- .num_busy_placement = 1,
- .busy_placement = place,
};
return 0;
@@ -2150,9 +2149,7 @@ int xe_bo_migrate(struct xe_bo *bo, u32 mem_type)
xe_place_from_ttm_type(mem_type, &requested);
placement.num_placement = 1;
- placement.num_busy_placement = 1;
placement.placement = &requested;
- placement.busy_placement = &requested;
/*
* Stolen needs to be handled like below VRAM handling if we ever need
--
2.26.3
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list