[PATCH v5 1/1] drm/xe: Expose number of dss per group and helpers

Dong, Zhanjun zhanjun.dong at intel.com
Wed Jan 31 15:47:32 UTC 2024



On 2024-01-30 7:09 p.m., Matt Roper wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:22:08PM -0800, Zhanjun Dong wrote:
>> Expose helper for dss per group. This is a precursor patch to allow
>> for easier iteration through MCR registers and other per-DSS uses.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhanjun Dong <zhanjun.dong at intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c      | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h      | 17 ++++++++++++
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c |  3 ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h    |  2 ++
>>   4 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
>> index 77925b35cf8d..ad2e42dc2218 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.c
>> @@ -291,11 +291,16 @@ static void init_steering_mslice(struct xe_gt *gt)
>>   	gt->steering[LNCF].instance_target = 0;		/* unused */
>>   }
>>   
>> +int xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_per_group(struct xe_gt *gt)
>> +{
>> +	return gt_to_xe(gt)->info.platform == XE_PVC ? 8 : 4;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static void init_steering_dss(struct xe_gt *gt)
>>   {
>>   	unsigned int dss = min(xe_dss_mask_group_ffs(gt->fuse_topo.g_dss_mask, 0, 0),
>>   			       xe_dss_mask_group_ffs(gt->fuse_topo.c_dss_mask, 0, 0));
>> -	unsigned int dss_per_grp = gt_to_xe(gt)->info.platform == XE_PVC ? 8 : 4;
>> +	unsigned int dss_per_grp = xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_per_group(gt);
>>   
>>   	gt->steering[DSS].group_target = dss / dss_per_grp;
>>   	gt->steering[DSS].instance_target = dss % dss_per_grp;
> 
> To avoid duplicating the logic, we could just replace these lines with a
> call to your new xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_steering() function as well.  Then we
> don't even need the dss_per_grp local variable.

There are pointer type mismatch issue, both 
gt->steering[DSS].group_target and gt->steering[DSS].instance_target are 
u16, while xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_steering take uint*, which called by the 
macro and get the pointer from macro. I would prefer leave int type as 
macro argument type as it is easy and safe way to avoid write 4/8 bytes 
to 2 bytes data.
Let's leave the part as is to avoid u16* vs uint* type issue.

> 
>> @@ -683,3 +688,36 @@ void xe_gt_mcr_steering_dump(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p)
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>   }
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_steering - returns the group/instance steering for a DSS
>> + * @gt: GT structure
>> + * @dss: DSS ID to obtain steering for
>> + * @group: pointer to storage for steering group ID
>> + * @instance: pointer to storage for steering instance ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns the steering IDs (via the @group and @instance parameters) that
>> + * correspond to a specific DSS ID.
>> + */
>> +void xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_steering(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int dss, unsigned int *group,
>> +				unsigned int *instance)
>> +{
>> +	int dss_per_grp = xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_per_group(gt);
>> +
>> +	*group = dss / dss_per_grp;
>> +	*instance = dss % dss_per_grp;
>> +}
>> +
>> +bool xe_gt_mcr_dss_has_subslice(struct xe_gt *gt, int slice, int subslice)
> 
> "dss" and "subslice" are basically two terms for the same thing so this
> name is a bit redundant.  Something like "xe_gt_mcr_has_dss" would
> probably be fine?
> 
> Although this should probably be in xe_gt_topology rather than xe_gt_mcr
> since it deals more with the hardware topology than with steering.  So
> moving it over to that file, the name would become
> "xe_gt_topology_has_dss."
Moved to xe_gt_topology is fine, because the function need dss per group 
to do calculation, then it requires xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_per_group exposed.

> 
>> +{
>> +	int dss_per_grp = xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_per_group(gt);
>> +	int index = slice * dss_per_grp + subslice;
>> +
>> +	if (index >= XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS) {
>> +		xe_gt_dbg(gt, "DSS id out of range: slice:%d subslice:%d\n", slice, subslice);
>> +		return false;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return test_bit(index, gt->fuse_topo.g_dss_mask) ||
>> +	       test_bit(index, gt->fuse_topo.c_dss_mask);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h
>> index 27ca1bc880a0..356f21978eb8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_mcr.h
>> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>>   #define _XE_GT_MCR_H_
>>   
>>   #include "regs/xe_reg_defs.h"
>> +#include "xe_gt_types.h"
>>   
>>   struct drm_printer;
>>   struct xe_gt;
>> @@ -25,5 +26,21 @@ void xe_gt_mcr_multicast_write(struct xe_gt *gt, struct xe_reg_mcr mcr_reg,
>>   			       u32 value);
>>   
>>   void xe_gt_mcr_steering_dump(struct xe_gt *gt, struct drm_printer *p);
>> +int xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_per_group(struct xe_gt *gt);
> 
> It doesn't look like you actually use this outside of xe_gt_mcr.c
> anymore so we probably don't need to export it.  It can remain a static
> function for now.
Same to above, move xe_gt_mcr_has_dss to xe_gt_topology.c conflicts with 
this static prototype definition.

> 
>> +void xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_steering(struct xe_gt *gt, unsigned int dss, unsigned int *group,
>> +				unsigned int *instance);
>> +bool xe_gt_mcr_dss_has_subslice(struct xe_gt *gt, int slice, int subslice);
>> +
>> +#define _HAS_DSS(gt__, group__, instance__) xe_gt_mcr_dss_has_subslice(gt__, group__, instance__)
> 
> I don't think we need this macro which is just a pure alias for the real
> function.
Sure, will take it off.

> 
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Loop over each subslice/DSS and determine the group and instance IDs that
>> + * should be used to steer MCR accesses toward this DSS.
>> + */
>> +#define for_each_dss_steering(dss_, gt_, group_, instance_) \
>> +	for (dss_ = 0, xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_steering(gt_, 0, &(group_), &(instance_)); \
>> +	     dss_ < XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS; \
>> +	     dss_++, xe_gt_mcr_get_dss_steering(gt_, dss_, &(group_), &(instance_))) \
>> +		for_each_if(_HAS_DSS(gt_, (group_), (instance_)))
> 
> We could also probably implement this more efficiently if we had a
> topology helper like this (untested):
> 
>      int xe_gt_topology_get_next_dss(struct xe_gt *gt, int from) {
>              xe_dss_mask_t all_dss;
>              unsigned long next;
>      
>              bitmap_or(all_dss,
>                        gt->fuse_topo.g_dss_mask,
>                        gt->fuse_topo.c_dss_mask,
>                        XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS);
> 
>              next = find_next_bit(all_dss, XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS, from);
>              if (next == XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS)
>                      return -1;
>      
>              return next;
>      }
> 
> Then you could write these loops as something like:
> 
>     #define for_each_dss_steering(dss_, gt_, group_, instance_) \
>             for (dss_ = xe_gt_topology_get_next_dss(gt, 0); \
>                  dss_ >= 0; \
>                  dss_ = xe_gt_topology_get_next_dss(gt, dss_ + 1)) \
> 
The macro above actually not set group_ and instance_, while the macro 
for_each_dss_steering designed is to iterate all dss id, call a code 
block, with group_ and instance_ already set. In my review comments to 
Jose's patch, I have similar optimization, but revert back because of 
the same group_ and instance_ not set reason.

> That also avoids leaking the XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS internal detail
> outside the topology files.
> 
>>   
>>   #endif /* _XE_GT_MCR_H_ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
>> index a8d7f272c30a..e973eeaac7f1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_topology.c
>> @@ -11,9 +11,6 @@
>>   #include "xe_gt.h"
>>   #include "xe_mmio.h"
>>   
>> -#define XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS (32 * XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_REGS)
>> -#define XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_BITS (32 * XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_REGS)
>> -
>>   static void
>>   load_dss_mask(struct xe_gt *gt, xe_dss_mask_t mask, int numregs, ...)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
>> index 70c615dd1498..b926606edb38 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h
>> @@ -25,7 +25,9 @@ enum xe_gt_type {
>>   };
>>   
>>   #define XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_REGS	3
>> +#define XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_BITS	(32 * XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_REGS)
> 
> Based on the suggestions above, I don't think moving these will actually
> be necessary.
This bind with for_each_dss_steering macro define.
> 
> 
> Matt
> 
>>   #define XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_REGS	1
>> +#define XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_BITS	(32 * XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_REGS)
>>   
>>   typedef unsigned long xe_dss_mask_t[BITS_TO_LONGS(32 * XE_MAX_DSS_FUSE_REGS)];
>>   typedef unsigned long xe_eu_mask_t[BITS_TO_LONGS(32 * XE_MAX_EU_FUSE_REGS)];
>> -- 
>> 2.34.1
>>
> 


More information about the Intel-xe mailing list