[PATCH v7 5/8] drm/ttm: Provide a generic LRU walker helper
Thomas Hellström
thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com
Fri Jul 5 15:32:03 UTC 2024
Provide a generic LRU walker in TTM, in the spirit of drm_gem_lru_scan()
but building on the restartable TTM LRU functionality.
The LRU walker optionally supports locking objects as part of
a ww mutex locking transaction, to mimic to some extent the
current functionality in ttm. However any -EDEADLK return
is converted to -ENOSPC and then to -ENOMEM before reaching
the driver, so that the driver will need to backoff and possibly retry
without being able to keep the ticket.
v3:
- Move the helper to core ttm.
- Remove the drm_exec usage from it for now, it will be
reintroduced later in the series.
v4:
- Handle the -EALREADY case if ticketlocking.
v6:
- Some cleanup and added code comments (Matthew Brost)
- Clarified the ticketlock in the commit message (Matthew Brost)
v7:
- Use s64 rather than long for the target and progress
(Christian König)
- Update documentation to not encourage using pages as a
progress measure. (Christian König)
- Remove cond_resched(). (Christian König)
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
Cc: Somalapuram Amaranath <Amaranath.Somalapuram at amd.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
Cc: <dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom at linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com> #v6
---
drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h | 35 +++++++
2 files changed, 186 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
index 0b3f4267130c..c2759add58f5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
@@ -768,3 +768,154 @@ int ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
ttm_tt_destroy(bo->bdev, ttm);
return ret;
}
+
+static bool ttm_lru_walk_trylock(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk,
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
+ bool *needs_unlock)
+{
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx = walk->ctx;
+
+ *needs_unlock = false;
+
+ if (dma_resv_trylock(bo->base.resv)) {
+ *needs_unlock = true;
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ if (bo->base.resv == ctx->resv && ctx->allow_res_evict) {
+ dma_resv_assert_held(bo->base.resv);
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ return false;
+}
+
+static int ttm_lru_walk_ticketlock(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk,
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
+ bool *needs_unlock)
+{
+ struct dma_resv *resv = bo->base.resv;
+ int ret;
+
+ if (walk->ctx->interruptible)
+ ret = dma_resv_lock_interruptible(resv, walk->ticket);
+ else
+ ret = dma_resv_lock(resv, walk->ticket);
+
+ if (!ret) {
+ *needs_unlock = true;
+ /*
+ * Only a single ticketlock per loop. Ticketlocks are prone
+ * to return -EDEADLK causing the eviction to fail, so
+ * after waiting for the ticketlock, revert back to
+ * trylocking for this walk.
+ */
+ walk->ticket = NULL;
+ } else if (ret == -EDEADLK) {
+ /* Caller needs to exit the ww transaction. */
+ ret = -ENOSPC;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static void ttm_lru_walk_unlock(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool locked)
+{
+ if (locked)
+ dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
+}
+
+/**
+ * ttm_lru_walk_for_evict() - Perform a LRU list walk, with actions taken on
+ * valid items.
+ * @walk: describe the walks and actions taken
+ * @bdev: The TTM device.
+ * @man: The struct ttm_resource manager whose LRU lists we're walking.
+ * @target: The end condition for the walk.
+ *
+ * The LRU lists of @man are walk, and for each struct ttm_resource encountered,
+ * the corresponding ttm_buffer_object is locked and taken a reference on, and
+ * the LRU lock is dropped. the LRU lock may be dropped before locking and, in
+ * that case, it's verified that the item actually remains on the LRU list after
+ * the lock, and that the buffer object didn't switch resource in between.
+ *
+ * With a locked object, the actions indicated by @walk->process_bo are
+ * performed, and after that, the bo is unlocked, the refcount dropped and the
+ * next struct ttm_resource is processed. Here, the walker relies on
+ * TTM's restartable LRU list implementation.
+ *
+ * Typically @walk->process_bo() would return the number of pages evicted,
+ * swapped or shrunken, so that when the total exceeds @target, or when the
+ * LRU list has been walked in full, iteration is terminated. It's also terminated
+ * on error. Note that the definition of @target is done by the caller, it
+ * could have a different meaning than the number of pages.
+ *
+ * Note that the way dma_resv individualization is done, locking needs to be done
+ * either with the LRU lock held (trylocking only) or with a reference on the
+ * object.
+ *
+ * Return: The progress made towards target or negative error code on error.
+ */
+s64 ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_device *bdev,
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man, s64 target)
+{
+ struct ttm_resource_cursor cursor;
+ struct ttm_resource *res;
+ s64 progress = 0;
+ s64 lret;
+
+ spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+ ttm_resource_manager_for_each_res(man, &cursor, res) {
+ struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = res->bo;
+ bool bo_needs_unlock = false;
+ bool bo_locked = false;
+ int mem_type;
+
+ /*
+ * Attempt a trylock before taking a reference on the bo,
+ * since if we do it the other way around, and the trylock fails,
+ * we need to drop the lru lock to put the bo.
+ */
+ if (ttm_lru_walk_trylock(walk, bo, &bo_needs_unlock))
+ bo_locked = true;
+ else if (!walk->ticket || walk->ctx->no_wait_gpu ||
+ walk->trylock_only)
+ continue;
+
+ if (!ttm_bo_get_unless_zero(bo)) {
+ ttm_lru_walk_unlock(bo, bo_needs_unlock);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ mem_type = res->mem_type;
+ spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+
+ lret = 0;
+ if (!bo_locked)
+ lret = ttm_lru_walk_ticketlock(walk, bo, &bo_needs_unlock);
+
+ /*
+ * Note that in between the release of the lru lock and the
+ * ticketlock, the bo may have switched resource,
+ * and also memory type, since the resource may have been
+ * freed and allocated again with a different memory type.
+ * In that case, just skip it.
+ */
+ if (!lret && bo->resource && bo->resource->mem_type == mem_type)
+ lret = walk->ops->process_bo(walk, bo);
+
+ ttm_lru_walk_unlock(bo, bo_needs_unlock);
+ ttm_bo_put(bo);
+ if (lret == -EBUSY || lret == -EALREADY)
+ lret = 0;
+ progress = (lret < 0) ? lret : progress + lret;
+
+ spin_lock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+ if (progress < 0 || progress >= target)
+ break;
+ }
+ ttm_resource_cursor_fini_locked(&cursor);
+ spin_unlock(&bdev->lru_lock);
+
+ return progress;
+}
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
index ef0f52f56ebc..21fa9d5964ec 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
@@ -194,6 +194,41 @@ struct ttm_operation_ctx {
uint64_t bytes_moved;
};
+struct ttm_lru_walk;
+
+/** struct ttm_lru_walk_ops - Operations for a LRU walk. */
+struct ttm_lru_walk_ops {
+ /**
+ * process_bo - Process this bo.
+ * @walk: struct ttm_lru_walk describing the walk.
+ * @bo: A locked and referenced buffer object.
+ *
+ * Return: Negative error code on error, User-defined positive value
+ * (typically, but not always, size of the processed bo) on success.
+ * On success, the returned values are summed by the walk and the
+ * walk exits when its target is met.
+ * 0 also indicates success, -EBUSY means this bo was skipped.
+ */
+ s64 (*process_bo)(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
+};
+
+/**
+ * struct ttm_lru_walk - Structure describing a LRU walk.
+ */
+struct ttm_lru_walk {
+ /** @ops: Pointer to the ops structure. */
+ const struct ttm_lru_walk_ops *ops;
+ /** @ctx: Pointer to the struct ttm_operation_ctx. */
+ struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx;
+ /** @ticket: The struct ww_acquire_ctx if any. */
+ struct ww_acquire_ctx *ticket;
+ /** @tryock_only: Only use trylock for locking. */
+ bool trylock_only;
+};
+
+s64 ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct ttm_device *bdev,
+ struct ttm_resource_manager *man, s64 target);
+
/**
* ttm_bo_get - reference a struct ttm_buffer_object
*
--
2.44.0
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list