[PATCH v2 00/11] Proper GT TLB invalidation layering and new coalescing feature.
Matthew Brost
matthew.brost at intel.com
Tue Jul 9 16:35:58 UTC 2024
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 06:08:54PM +0200, Nirmoy Das wrote:
>
> On 7/9/2024 11:57 AM, Matthew Auld wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 08/07/2024 05:03, Matthew Brost wrote:
> > > While debuging [1] an issue was identified in which if too many GT TLB
> > > invalidations are issued to the GuC, the GuC can get overwhelmed to the
> > > point scheduling of jobs starts to stall. To avoid this, hold and
> > > coalesce GT TLB invalidations in the KMD if a watermark of pending
> > > invalidations is past. Add gitlab for this issue has also been opened
> > > [2].
> > >
> > > Layering issues with GT TLB invalidations are known [3] which needed to
> > > be fixed first before adding this new feature.
> > >
> > > - Patches 1-8 fix the layering.
> > > - Patches 9-11 add coalescing feature.
> > >
> > > We could merge these two as seperate series if needed.
> > >
> > > CCing various stakeholders (Farah, Michal, Nirmoy) which have raised GT
> > > TLB invalidation issues in the past.
> >
> > Maybe worth mentioning for [1], we try to process TLB invalidations
> > directly from the irq, however we also only process the g2h queue
> > in-order, so if there is something other than TLB invalidation or fault
> > earlier in the queue then we do nothing useful from the irq and just
> > return, that is until the wq can eventually process those earlier items
> > that couldn't be processed directly from the irq. In the past
>
> Seen this recently :
>
> <3> [3763.731822] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* GT0: g2h outstanding: 611
> <snip>
> <6> [3727.857273] [IGT] xe_evict: executing
> <3> [3730.165480] xe 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* TILE0 [GTT] GT0: TLB
> invalidation time'd out, seqno=26858, recv=2685
Missing the last digit of '2685'?
>
> Which I think fits your description. This series should help but not sure
> how much.
>
>From arch level if this is a continued problem, perhaps we should ask
for a dedicated G2H queue for TLB invalidation done responses. It seems
like a fairly reasonable ask to me as TLB invalidations really shouldn't
get stuck behind other G2H processing...
Matt
>
> Regards,
>
> Nirmoy
>
> > I have seen TLB timeouts where the TLB invalidation is clearly in the
> > g2h queue (and has been for a while), but is stuck behind something
> > earlier in the queue that needs the wq, but system is under such a heavy
> > load that the wq can't be scheduled in a timely manner.
> >
> > >
> > > v2:
> > > - Fix CI issues
> > > - Clean up some of the series / patch structure
> > >
> > > Matt
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/799#note_2449497
> > > [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/xe/kernel/-/issues/2162
> > > [3] https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/133001/
> > >
> > > Matthew Brost (11):
> > > drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_fence_init helper
> > > drm/xe: Drop xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_wait
> > > drm/xe: s/tlb_invalidation.lock/tlb_invalidation.fence_lock
> > > drm/xe: Add tlb_invalidation.seqno_lock
> > > drm/xe: Add xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_done_handler
> > > drm/xe: Add send tlb invalidation helpers
> > > drm/xe: Add xe_guc_tlb_invalidation layer
> > > drm/xe: Add multi-client support for GT TLB invalidations
> > > drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation coalescing
> > > drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation coalesce tracepoints
> > > drm/xe: Add GT TLB invalidation watermark debugfs
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_debugfs.c | 38 ++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device.c | 3 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_device_types.h | 5 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt.c | 21 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_ggtt_types.h | 5 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.c | 641 ++++++++++++------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h | 26 +-
> > > .../gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_tlb_invalidation_types.h | 41 ++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_gt_types.h | 43 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_ct.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_invalidation.c | 145 ++++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_invalidation.h | 18 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_pt.c | 33 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_trace.h | 10 +
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm.c | 45 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_vm_types.h | 3 +
> > > 17 files changed, 801 insertions(+), 279 deletions(-)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_invalidation.c
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_tlb_invalidation.h
> > >
More information about the Intel-xe
mailing list